this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2025
386 points (93.7% liked)

MeanwhileOnGrad

1983 readers
53 users here now

"Oh, this is calamity! Calamity! Oh no, he's on the floor!"

Welcome to MoG!


Meanwhile On Grad


Documenting hate speech, conspiracy theories, apologia/revisionism, and general tankie behaviour across the fediverse. Memes are welcome!


What is a Tankie?


Alternatively, a detailed blog post about Tankies.

(caution of biased source)


Basic Rules:

Sh.itjust.works Instance rules apply! If you are from other instances, please be mindful of the rules. — Basically, don't be a dick.

Hate-Speech — You should be familiar with this one already; practically all instances have the same rules on hate speech.

Apologia(Using the Modern terminology for Apologia) No Defending, Denying, Justifying, Bolstering, or Differentiating authoritarian acts or endeavours, whether be a Pro-CCP viewpoint, Stalinism, Islamic Terrorism or any variation of Tankie Ideology.

Revisionism — No downplaying or denying atrocities past and present. Calling Tankies shills, foreign/federal agents, or bots also falls under this rule. Extremists exist. They are real. Do not call them shills or fake users as it handwaves their extremism.

Tankies can explain their views but may be criticised or attacked for them. Any slight infraction on the rules above will immediately earn a warning and possibly a ban.

Off-topic Discussion — Do not discuss unrelated topics to the point of derailing the thread. Stay focused on the direct content of the post, rather than engaging in argument.

Brigading — If you're here because this community was linked in another thread, please refrain from voting, commenting or manipulating the post in any way. All votes are public, and if you are found to be brigading, you will be permanently banned.

You'll be warned if you're violating the instance and community rules. Continuing poor behaviour after being warned will result in a ban or removal of your comments. Bans typically only last 24 hours, but each subsequent infraction will double the amount. Depending on the content, the ban time may be increased. You may request an unban at any time.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Excuse me while I go donate even more money to PieFed

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LoveOutside@slrpnk.net -1 points 5 days ago
[–] rimu@piefed.social 224 points 1 week ago (19 children)

PieFed dev here.

The screenshotted post is very misleading. As you'd expect from a hexbearian. It is not a baked-in ban.

Hexbear is mentioned in the PieFed source code, as an initial default value for the defederation list. That list is quite long and includes various instances that have been a source of trolls, CSAM and spam in the past (mostly Mastodon instances). As part of the normal setup process it is assumed that instance admins will review that list and alter it as they see fit. They can change it any time by going to instance.tld/admin/federation.

Do not take anything a hexbearian says at face value.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 57 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

That's exactly what this is, an initial defed list. Even the way they present this is disingenous as fuck, calling it a "one way federation, silencing our voices" or some other weird phrasing, making it sound like some underhanded/hidden hardcoded piece just for them, when it's just a boring-ass defederation with one instance among many others. How difficult is it to say "piefed software defederates hexbear by default"? Everyone knows what that fucking means!

I honestly don't understand why everything has to be taken so goddamn uncharitably by the regulars on that instance. It blows my mind how they manage to always act in bad faith. Always.

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 27 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I honestly don't understand why everything has to be taken so goddamn uncharitably by the regulars on that instance. It blows my mind how they manage to always act in bad faith. Always.

It's pretty straightforward, imo, they built a feedback loop into their instance culture that encouraged social dopamine junkies to participate in toxic behaviors, valuing things like "dunking", othering, and dehumanizing the out group (non-hexies) over things like factuality, good faith, and not being dicks.

[–] Blaze@lemmy.zip 28 points 1 week ago

Thank you for jumping in.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Correct me if I'm wrong, but this also wouldn't mean "one way federation" right? There would just be no synching at all.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] ozymandias@lemmy.dbzer0.com 46 points 1 week ago (1 children)

we need a fediverse-wide boycott of hexbear

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 40 points 1 week ago (5 children)
[–] ozymandias@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

less so but yeah they’re pretty toxic

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Idk, just got done reading yet another monologue from Cowbee about how the PRC really is better than the U.S. in every single way — I'd personally weigh .ml as being much more toxic.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 42 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (25 children)

Not sure I dig baking it into the code, that starts walking into the broken by design space. Feasibly the tankies developing Lemmy could do the same to any instance not painted the right shade of red.

I might propose instead a step in setup, or on demand, to select major instances to allow/deny federation from with a description of them. Impossible to keep a list of every new instance up to date, but catching the major hubs shouldn't be impossible.

Edit: For all those who replied along the lines of it being optional not a hard coded block, point noted. I should expect no less misleading a post from a pool of people prone to leaving out vital facts.

My understanding as it being an opt-out default defederation is still a bit grating since I tend to think of software as a neutral tool rather than promoting specific ideals, but it's far better than a fixed in state and does serve some purpose to shield new users from some of the most egregiously bad actors.

[–] floo@retrolemmy.com 11 points 1 week ago

I don’t know if this is the answer, but it sure sounds like a step in the right direction.

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 week ago

It's just a default ban that can be turned off if desired.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago

Sane defaults make self-hosting approachable.

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Fediverse wide

Do they think they have influence beyond the ML instances?

[–] PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk 23 points 1 week ago

think

There is the error in the logic.

It's exhausting wasting effort on those that put none in.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There's a lot of .ml users who make accounts on sjw and fail at radicalizing those users.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheFrirish@jlai.lu 35 points 1 week ago

It's just a default block on grad and hex when creating a new instance which can be toggled off. Keep coming crying with your ALTs Tankies no one wants to deal with your incessant propaganda.

[–] socsa@piefed.social 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Based.

The only thing better than this was Nutomic whining that he needs more donations to feed his family (he literally said this) but absolutely refusing to just ask Dessalines to chill the fuck out with the tankie censorship shit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why bother with the 1 way federation, though?

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So your users can go on their instance, I guess? That's not a great reason. Cut them off or don't.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Agreed, there is no good reason for a one way federation with a trash instance.

Even if the idea is that they have communities that aren't horrible, the taint is strong enough that the same communities should just be promoted on non/less shitty instances.

[–] Carnelian@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think it’s the other way around, actually. It sounds like hex users are actually receiving posts from outside but it’s their own content that is being blocked

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

IMO, it's not great regardless of which direction it's going. Fuck ML'ers, but it isn't really necessary to create one-way engagement with them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Gork@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 week ago

What gets me is that their users are so smug. It's really off-putting.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I mean I think that is a bad and unhealthy idea. If piefed.social, world or a particular instance wants to set it up that way then go ahead, sure, but I do think it should be up to the admin using the software to decide which servers this should or shouldn't apply to rather than what sounds like an opt-out scheme. I mean sure go ahead, code how you like, who am I to judge, but I'm only saying it in consideration of best practices.

If HB runs into the silly issue again that almost lost them their domain (and temporarily switched to chapo.chat), this code will be a maintenance burden just because of the developer's specific grudge.

I'm saying this as a user happy about the fact that my instance defederated hexbear and lemmygrad, there are cool communities there, but they are an insufferable bunch.

[–] BananaIsABerry@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I believe they further clarified that there are specific default filter sets that can be loaded when a new piefed instance is created, not that they are literally removed in code.

Here's the comments discussing it:

[–] HackerJoe@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 week ago (4 children)

centrist extremists

can't make that shit up...

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Good luck with that they/them in Russia.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

I'd say don't block anything at the top and let users filter their own feed as they see fit, except blocking communities is not very effective, in my experience.

More robust filtering and sorting for the user would be welcome. For instance, Reddit Enhancement Suite lets me hover over a name that has an "ignore" button for users, and a "filter" button for subs. That's very user-friendly and effective there. The same here would be a good addition.

I understand that the structure of Fediverse makes this more challenging.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›