this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2025
34 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

39516 readers
372 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dinckelman@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

A fine isnt enough. This platform needs to be permanently shutdown.

This place is breeding grounds for morons, bigots, predators, and other social rejects, and it lets all of them continue thriving. By no comprehensible measure should that be normal, but somehow it is.

[–] digdilem@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Never heard of it, but isn't it the case that if it is shut down, that group of people will just move elsewhere as they have before?

[–] dinckelman@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Correct. And the only choice from then is to continue deplatforming them even further. Bigots and abusers don't deserve to have a voice

[–] Ferk@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

But I don't understand why don't they go after the abusers, instead of imposing a fine to the platform. This looks like a criminal case, it's not just a matter that should be left in the hands of the platform to begin with.. so why focus on blaming the platform?

Someone got bullied so hard they died, and the response is to simply ban them and then punish the platform? It sounds like an approach designed by lawyers who just want to make money, instead of actually an attempt to fix/correct the problem.

It's like blaming the email provider for allowing the exchange of messages and video files in a mailing group that was organizing crime.. instead of actually investigating the people who committed the crime and enacting laws / setting precedent that could act as deterrent, independently of which channel was used while committing the crime. Then punish the platform if they are not collaborating or if they are found to be complicit (while investigating the criminals).

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Every time you deplatform a group, it generally shrinks by about 10%. Keep doing it enough and eventually you have a group that's JUST the diehards, and that group is generally so small that they'll burn themselves out.