this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2025
175 points (98.3% liked)

Not The Onion

17727 readers
2414 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 80 points 4 days ago

I think Ryan Air is correct. You should book with a different carrier.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 57 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

If your readers don’t accept this policy, then they should please feel free to fly with other airlines, who may operate a more lax minors travel policy.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ryanair

The company has at times been criticised for its...tendency to intentionally generate controversy in order to gain publicity.[31][32][33]

"Let's be honest," the RyanAir spokesman continued. "If your readers aren't willing to even fly with their children, can it really be said that they even love them?"

[–] BigDiction@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

The last part of service section regarding the Afrikaans language test is wild. The sales flow is sacred and I cannot believe such a huge stupid blocker would get green lit into product.

[–] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

There's no such thing as bad publicity. We're seeing this daily.

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 14 points 4 days ago (1 children)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Breaks_Guitars

It was widely reported that within four weeks of the video being posted online, United Airlines' stock price fell 10%, costing stockholders about $180 million in value

What a silly thing to say.

[–] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

And where is their stock now?

I suppose it would be better to ask how long that lasted.

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

On 6 July, 2009, United Airlines opened at $3.31 and dipped to an intra-day low $3.07 (-7.25%) on 10 July, but that very day closed at $3.26 and traded as high as $6.00 (+81.27%) four weeks later on August 6.[20]

There it is, nearly instant profit

[–] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 days ago

That's exactly what the phrase means. I can guarantee you that smart traders made a good chunk off the dip.

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Once everyone forgot about it, I'm sure it went back to normal.

But it certainly did them no favours. The David Dao incident is another example of there definitely being bad publicity.

[–] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I mean, that's the point. It was a temporary thing and then business as normal.

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 days ago

Just because it blew over eventually doesn't mean it wasn't bad publicity.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 4 days ago

Sounds like they felt defensive being called out on incomptetence (software that lets you make bookings the company doesn't allow), which the response completely evaded in favor of insults.

[–] PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk 16 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Ryanair is like the single rider queue for rides.

They're handy if you need to go somewhere fast and cheap, but asking any more of them is just going to lead to frustrating and lots of extra fees.

At this point, their reputation is so well-publicised (and even celebrated) that nobody really has any real right to moan once they've actively selected them as a carrier.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Apropos of nothing, flew with them from Köln to Liverpool for €0.99! The taxes/fees were 4x that, sure, but the total airfare was < €10.

I didn't say that I willingly flew with them again since, but it happened. 😅🤪

[–] PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk 9 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Yeah, I went to a short notice concert in Laaaahndan last year when hotel prices were ludicrous. A same day domestic flight cost fifty notes .

I boarded with no luggage - just my watch, phone, wallet, and a phone charger - expected the bare minimum and wasn't disappointed. Like Ronseal, it did exactly what it said on the tin.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 4 days ago

I mean, the fact that they didn't return me in a pine box for that price was kinda surprising, but I was grateful and decided not to tempt The Fates further.

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Laaaahndan

There is absolutely no way that is a real place. Map, nuh-uh. You'd have to physically take me there, and then I will still be incredibly suspicious that I'm not just trapped in some weird dream.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 days ago

I think they mean Lunnun, innit?

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 days ago

When I search for flights, I always exclude RyanAir from the results. They're the only airline that not only has consistently shitty service, but also seems proud to abuse their customers. I hate to imagine how they cut corners in maintaining their aircraft.

[–] hellfire103@lemmy.ca 10 points 4 days ago

Damn, this one's oniony!

[–] waggz@programming.dev 3 points 4 days ago

https://youtu.be/uVASZ2lCY5Y

Fascinating Aida Cheap Flights

[–] FerretyFever0@fedia.io 2 points 4 days ago

Damn, no patience, that's wild.