this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2025
29 points (96.8% liked)

United States | News & Politics

8370 readers
414 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Following Donald Trump’s meeting with Vladimir Putin on Friday, Ukrainian officials are voicing concern over the US president’s apparent shift in tone after Putin demanded full control of Donetsk and Luhansk as a condition for ending the war.

On Truth Social, Trump said he wanted to “go directly to a peace agreement, which would end the war and not a mere ceasefire agreement, which often times do not hold up”.

Speaking to the Financial Times about Putin’s demands, a senior Ukrainian official said: “This is a stab in the back.”

Another senior Ukrainian official said: “He just wants a quick deal.”

Meanwhile, Oleksandr Merezhko, the chair of the Ukrainian parliament’s foreign affairs committee, told the outlet that the outcome of the summit was “awful”.

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 week ago

a senior Ukrainian official said: “This is a stab in the back.”

I'm sure this "stabbed-in-the-back" theory won't have any lasting effects.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I just found the difference in international headlines interesting when contrasted with US-based outlets.

  • International Headline: "These were the motherfucker's demands."
  • US Headline: "President Trump and Putin did not come to an agreement."
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

He basically wants Ukraine to surrender. Nothing less.

[–] marcie@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

So what everyone already knew. It would also be stupid of Russia not to demand areas up to Crimea so that Ukraine can't try to shut water off to Crimea again.

[–] lorty@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 week ago

Russia is winning. Anyone that expected anything different is just delusional.

[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

He just wants conflict resolution by any means necessary so he can get his peace prize regardless of consequences.

[–] lorty@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago

No, they can't be bogged down in Ukraine if they want to defeat China. This has always been about salvaging the disaster that this war has been.

[–] PanArab@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

Yet no peace in Southwest Asia

[–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh, so Putin will give up Crimea?

[–] PanArab@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

He should, it rightfully belongs to the Tatars. Just because it was conquered by the Russian Empire doesn't mean that any of its descendant states have any right to claim it. This was a wrong that the USSR should have righted when it created SSRs for other nations conquered by the Russian Empire but somehow for reasons that I don't know didn't do the same for the Crimean Tatars.

[–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I was making a joke about how Putin is anchoring the discussion to not even include Crimea.

[–] PanArab@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

Yeah, there’s no way that Crimea is on the table. Russia is keeping it and all the Russian majority regions in Ukraine.