this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2025
105 points (97.3% liked)

Global News

4761 readers
451 users here now

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.
Country prefixCountry prefix can be added to the title with a separator (|, :, etc.) where title is not clear enough from which country the news is coming from.


Rules

This community is moderated in accordance with the principles outlined in Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which emphasizes the right to freedom of opinion and expression. In addition to this foundational principle, we have some additional rules to ensure a respectful and constructive environment for all users.

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media postsAvoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon generated via LLM model | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A debate is erupting around Islamic face coverings in Finland's educational institutions.

Archived version: https://archive.is/20250813123725/https://yle.fi/a/74-20177195


Disclaimer: The article linked is from a single source with a single perspective. Make sure to cross-check information against multiple sources to get a comprehensive view on the situation.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 33 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Good. Fuck religious indoctrination among the kids.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (3 children)

It gets even worse, once the 'gods chosen people' and 'dirty heathens' discussions start. Kids have no filter. I'm speaking of all abrahamic religions and a a good chunk of everything else.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DeviantOvary@reddthat.com 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Agreed, and this goes for any religion that does it. But what really grinds my gears about (other) leftists defending this kind of religious expression is, this isn't something women choose. They're forced to and groomed from young age to cover themselves. Meanwhile, their brothers, fathers, sons all walk around free to wear shorts, t-shirts, etc. If men had to cover themselves the same way, then sure, at least there would be some level of equality. This is just plain old misogyny that has no place in modern societies.

However, with that said, there's a real possibility banning head coverings would ultimately hurt girls, instead of helping them. Good education and financial independence and stability in adulthood would give these girls a better and safer way to escape. Like with any other societal problem, it's complex and can't be simply "magiced" away.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But what really grinds my gears about (other) leftists defending this kind of religious expression is, this isn't something women choose.

How do you know that?

They're forced to and groomed from young age to cover themselves.

That's... kind of how all parenting works? You could legit say "they're forced to and groomed from young age to X" and replace X with anything you want and it'll work so you're not really saying much.

This is just plain old misogyny that has no place in modern societies.

Yeah here's the thing: Freedom of conscience means freedom of conscience, even when you don't like that conscience. If misogyny is reason enough for you to take a sledgehammer to this core pillar of democratic society then go ahead, but know that fascists can use that same sledgehammer against whatever beliefs you have that they don't like.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

And you'll solve that by telling them they can't dress the way they want? How does that work, exactly?

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 week ago (12 children)

You think the kids are the ones insisting they want to be covered up? It's the parents who are doing it. Take that ability away from the parents and the kids DGAF

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

In the previous comment I was replying to you in this post, you were just asking someone how would you know what they want to wear?

Try wearing a burka for a day and report back how you like it.

But they are allowed to wear whatever they want — within reason. You have to cover your genitals at least, that's usually a minimum. And you're not allowed to cover your entire face. Between those two rules, I'm sure you can come up with something you'll like.

Hijabs are still completely fine, btw.

Those are the ones that a cultural argument can be made for and I definitely see how one can also definitely want to wear them. But burka or niqab? C'mon who are you lying to?

[–] unknownuserunknownlocation@kbin.earth 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I always love the irony when people worry that others are being dictated on how to dress so they then themselves dictate to people how they can dress.

[–] Noblebuttcheeky@piefed.social 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I always love the irony when people making such comments are unable to understand that setting SOME dressing rules in schools and working places is absolutely NOT the same as the dictation of wearing distinct clothing anytime and anywhere. The latter has far bigger restrictive impact on your freedom of expression.

[–] Carl@hexbear.net 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

On the one hand I agree that some dressing rules in schools and working places are fine - but on the other you have to be willfully ignorant if you can't see the blatant Islamophobia at play with targeting religious head coverings like this. Note how they always go after niqabs, but never dastars. Dressing rules at school should be about teaching kids what's expected in polite society, and polite society should make room for cultural expression.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Unpigged@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This puts a lot of pressure on Muslim girls and places them in a further disadvantaged position compared to not only Christians, but even to Muslim boys.

Also, while Finnish schools are expected maintain confessional neutrality, display of a cross somehow doesn't count.

Fuck religion. Embrace personal experience over dogmatic teachings.

[–] WideningGyro@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Ah yes, religion. Famously not part of anyone's personal experience.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Freedom of religion until we don't like it.

[–] DampSquid@feddit.uk 7 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Why should there be freedom of religion any more? What does religion do?

[–] mathemachristian@hexbear.net 14 points 1 week ago (4 children)

It's a part of culture. You can't dictate to a people how their culture should be. And in case of a minority group like muslims in Norway it's a form of oppression. Because you know who will be targeted first if freedom of religion falls.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 week ago

Why should a state be allowed to dictate what people believe?

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 11 points 1 week ago

Because freedom of religion is pretty much just a special case of freedom of thought and conscience? Unless you want the state to use its monopoly on violence to punish people for wrongthink, freedom of religion is here to stay.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Why should there be freedom of religion any more?

This is an argument that will lead to you being forced into being a christian.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dastanktal@hexbear.net 7 points 1 week ago (14 children)

This is stupid but also dumb. The article said that it would make it illegal to wear face coverings. So does that include, like, medical masks?

This law is just straight up Anti-Islam.

Can you imagine the outcry if a similar law was passed to prevent people from wearing yamakas on the idea of "freedom"?

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Kenny2999@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Every finn should get an emotional support burka.

[–] belated_frog_pants@beehaw.org 4 points 1 week ago

This is pure and simple Islamophobia and racism. Their head dressings do not detract from anyone's learning including their own. This is like banning hair dye because it might "disturb and distract" other students. Bullshit.

[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
load more comments
view more: next ›