this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2024
461 points (96.0% liked)

Linux

48323 readers
644 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

If your IP (and possible your browser) looks "suspicious" or has been used by other users before, you need to add additional information for registration on gitlab.com, which includes your mobile phone number and possibly credit card information. Since it is not possible to contribute or even report issues on open source projects without doing so, I do not think any open source project should use this service until they change that.

Screenshot: https://i.ibb.co/XsfcfHf/gitlab.png

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ipacialsection@startrek.website 167 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I remember when gitlab.com was the most accessible alternative to GitHub out there, but it seems they're only interested in internal enterprise usage now. Their main page was already completely unreadable to someone not versed in enterprise tech marketing lingo, and now this.

Thankfully Gitea and Forgejo have gotten better in the meantime, with Codeberg as a flagship instance of the latter.

[–] AdmiralShat@programming.dev 68 points 9 months ago (7 children)

On a tangent, why are all of these companies pushing AI programming? This shit isn't nearly as functional as they make it seem and all the beginners who try it are constantly asking questions about why their generated code doesn't work

[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.world 64 points 9 months ago (1 children)

We are in the hype cycle so everyone is going bananas and there's money to be made prior to the trough of disillusionment.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 42 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

It's their wet dream. Making software without programmers.

Execs have never cared about the technology or the engineering side of it. If you could make software by banging on a pot while dancing naked around the fire, they'd have been ok with that.

And now that AI has come along that's basically what it looks like to them.

[–] DrJenkem@lemmy.blugatch.tube 27 points 9 months ago

VC's and companies like OpenAI have done a really good job of propagandizing AI (LLMs). People think it's magical and the future, so there's money in saying you have it.

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 25 points 9 months ago

Because it brings in mad VC funding

[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.social 17 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

the beginners who try it are constantly asking questions about why their generated code doesn’t work

Because it ain't here to generate all their code for them. It's a glorified autocomplete and suggestion engine. When are people gonna get this? (not you, just in general)

I use CoPilot myself, but if you have absolutely no idea what you're doing yourself, you and CoPilot will both quickly hit a dead end together. It doesn't actually understand what you want the code to do. Only what is similar to what you have already written or prompted for, which may be some garbage picked up from a noob on the web somewhere. Books and research using your meatbrain are still very much needed.

[–] devfuuu@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

It's not in the interest of all the techbros to sell the new age AIshit as something less that can only do such small thing. They need to hype the shit out of it to get all the crazy investors money that understand nothing about it but only see AI buzzwords everywhere and need to go for it now because of FOMO.

It's only gonna get much worse before it is toned down to appropriate usage.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Badabinski@kbin.social 13 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Because greedy investors are gullible and want to make money from the jobs they think AI will displace. They don't know that this shit doesn't work like they've been promised. The C-levels at Gitlab want their money (gotta love publicly traded companies), and nobody is listening to the devs who are shouting that AI is great at writing security vulnerabilities or just like, totally nonfunctioning code.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Anarch157a@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

For my private repos, hosted on my home server, I moved from Gitlab to Forgejo (Git, artifacts and containers images) and Woodpecker for CI builds. Woodpecker is not as powerful and feature complete as Gitlab, but for simpler needs it gets the job done.

[–] CalcProgrammer1@lemmy.ml 67 points 9 months ago (2 children)

GitLab used to be awesome when it was the place to go after MS bought out GitHub. They had premium access for all public projects under a FOSS license and top-tier CI. Then as time went on, they began pulling support for various functions in a very Microsoftian EEE sort of way. First requiring credit cards fir new users to access the CI, then taking away the CI almost entirely except for a practically useless monthly allotment, then taking away the premium access for public FOSS licensed projects. If I were migrating today I would not have chosen GitLab, but it is where I settled after leaving GitHub and my projects have grown to depend on GitLab CI even if I'm now forced to run my own runners due to the extreme nerfs they've done to the hosted CI. I mirrored OpenRGB to Codeberg, but since the CI pipelines depend on GitLab I don't see Codeberg becoming the main hub anytime soon unless they can execute GL CI configs. Sad to see how far GitLab has fallen though, it is unrecognizable from what it used to be as far as support for FOSS prohects goes, especially given how GitLab itself started as a FOSS project.

[–] danielquinn@lemmy.ca 16 points 9 months ago

Enshittification, also known as platform decay, is the pattern of decreasing quality of online platforms that act as two-sided markets. - Wikipedia

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 10 points 9 months ago

Maybe it's time to start listing the enshittification phase of a project on Wikipedia or something.

[–] TxzK@lemmy.zip 53 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Fuck GitLab. I used to use it until recently moved all my projects to codeberg. Way better. GitLab is becoming more and more like GitHub.

[–] BOFH666@lemmy.world 28 points 9 months ago

Forgejo ftw!

Self hosting here, also with runners to create a complete ci/cd line.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago (3 children)

GitLab is becoming more and more like GitHub.

Well, duh. That's the sales pitch: "Like GitHub, but cheaper."

[–] Max_P@lemmy.max-p.me 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Except it's way more expensive than GitHub. They jacked up the prices pretty hard. Now it's like $15/contributor for private orgs, and it's like $5 on GitHub for the same and more features.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ad_on_is@lemmy.world 52 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Maybe it's just me, but I never liked GitLab in the first place. The UI is just awful to me. Searching through issues, before posting a new one, is just a pita.

Pita = Pain in the ass

[–] jimbolauski@lemm.ee 12 points 9 months ago (4 children)

The best part of the Gitlab UI is when it gets upgraded and you have to relearn how to find everything.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] casual_turtle_stew_enjoyer@sh.itjust.works 34 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I created a GitLab account long before they implemented this, but never used it. Went to post an issue related to self-hosted GitLab on their issue tracker, and it told me my account was banned. I wrote an email to support and they essentially said "an automated system identified your account as a bot and banned you during an account clean up some years ago to cut back on malicious users". I informed them that this was not at all reasonable, as I've never even posted anything on any GitLab account, and that I would be advising my organization to never pay for any GitLab product or service unless legal writes up the contract terms, because I have no faith in them as a vendor.

Seriously, fuck GitLab. And if anyone from that org wants to discuss this with me, they can pipe their email to /dev/null

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jetster735180@lemmy.ca 34 points 9 months ago (1 children)

They been doing this for years. Here is a GitLab forum post about it.

As a gitlab user myself, I prefer gitlab over anything else because of their CI/CD. The free compute units run instantly now, no more queues orwaiting. A couple years ago, my pipelines would timeout after 3 hours.

[–] vivi@lemmy.ml 15 points 9 months ago

That post is only in regards to the CI feature. But today, even basic registration requires personal identification. You cannot even report bugs on open source projects without

[–] Pantherina@feddit.de 32 points 9 months ago (5 children)

Discourse, Git* and more really need federated search.

It is already hard getting Contributors for projects, even more if you are on some random selfhosted server that nobody finds and everyone needs to create a new account for.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] danielquinn@lemmy.ca 30 points 9 months ago

Can anyone else confirm this? As a long time user and champion of Gitlab, this is a deal-breaker for me.

[–] liliumstar@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 9 months ago

Like others, I had an account before this was implemented. I have a couple projects on there, also mirrored to self hosted gitea. Have had people refuse/unable to contribute to the gitlab project due to the kyc requirement, so I'm thinking I will migrate to codeberg soon.

[–] vivi@lemmy.ml 25 points 9 months ago

To add a few more details: After trying several times with different IPs and different browsers, I was able to register by providing only a mobile phone number once. Since that still requires personal information, this is still a very questionable process. (not to mention it took me a day to not be asked for a cred card)

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 23 points 9 months ago (13 children)
[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 47 points 9 months ago (5 children)
[–] thejevans@lemmy.ml 12 points 9 months ago (5 children)

I would LOVE to switch to codeberg for work, but my work requires that all data be hosted in the US, so I recently pitched GitLab as an alternative to GitHub, even though it's not perfect.

For work gitlab is fine, I'm sure your company can get the accounts verified for example. At least it's not microsoft

[–] ReakDuck@lemmy.ml 9 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Wait. Wtf does it need to be US specifically? So the goverment has full access to the data or what?

[–] Andrenikous@lemm.ee 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Probably so other governments don’t have full access.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 26 points 9 months ago (7 children)

If you want people to contribute to your project, Github is by far the best. If you're off Github, it reduces your visibility by a lot.

[–] bizdelnick@lemmy.ml 23 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You can host your project anywhere you want, setup mirroring to github and drop a link in its description. So you'll have github visibility and won't depend on github. Addiitional repo backup is a bonus.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] mvirts@lemmy.world 22 points 9 months ago (3 children)

No worries, gitlab is a trash Ruby on rails app anyway 😹

JK I do love gitlab, sad to see the corporate takeover. What features dont you get with the foss version? Can't figure it out amongst the marketing cruft. Seems like it would be relatively easy to build another hosted gitlab provider.

So why does gulab need to kyc anyway? And if it's a legal requirement, won't GitHub do the same?

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Is KYC a thing outside finance?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 19 points 9 months ago

Tried to register with gitlab three times some months back to file a bug against qemu. It rejected my registration silently every time (as in, it appeared to take it but never sent a confirmation email, not even one that got mistaken for spam). I gave up on filing the bug.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Screenshot: https://removed/XsfcfHf/gitlab.png

For LW users after scumbags used image hosters to spread childprn:

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] uis@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago
[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 14 points 9 months ago (5 children)

Policies like that are almost entirely about minimizing fraud and harassment. It really sucks for people who don't have mobile phones that support authentication texts or whatever (since, even as you pointed out, the requirement is mostly a phone number) but it also drastically cuts down on fake/harassment accounts.

[–] FrostyPolicy@suppo.fi 27 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's about data harvesting and selling not safety or any other mentioned.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 17 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Gitlab was getting attacked with thousands of spam accounts. Trying to fix the damage almost killed the company

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] vivi@lemmy.ml 13 points 9 months ago (8 children)

Even Github does not require any personal information, so there are certainly other ways.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

It's disgusting.

It should be illegal to require any personal information unless you can prove that it's literally impossible to provide your service without it, and always illegal to share that information with anyone (but a payment provider exclusively for verification purposes) for any reason.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BlanK0@lemmy.ml 9 points 9 months ago

This is wild 💀

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I stopped since they put a broken cloudflare config in front of it that puts me in an infinite loop so I can't ever log in

load more comments
view more: next ›