this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2025
574 points (96.0% liked)

Science Memes

16527 readers
2155 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 5 points 3 weeks ago

Piping hot rat.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

Apply directly to the cake

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

I'm not going to yuck Remmy's yum.

It ain't easy being tapered.

[–] enbiousenvy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 3 weeks ago
[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 weeks ago

Does anyone remember bonsai-kitty?

[–] funkajunk@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)
[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago

Eventually yes

I am going to hypothesize here: depends on how long rat's in the tube.

I'm imagining a scenario where a vet has to X-ray a pet rat. Rat goes in the tube for 5 minutes while images are taken and then Rat can come back out of the tube. Rat's probably going to be okay. A treat may be in order.

If he had to stay in there for a month, I don't think he'll ever be a normal rat again.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Kuori@hexbear.net 2 points 3 weeks ago

kinda wish this came with a cw for animal abuse

[–] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Fuck all animal testing and every scientist participating in it.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 1 points 3 weeks ago

What's wrong with thalidomide? We can just put the shelves lower!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] stray@pawb.social 0 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

Can images of animal abuse please be labeled as such and get a NSFW blur please?

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz -1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Putting your head in the sand is not a good way to engage with the world.

This is what your beef comes from, for example. (from wikipidia fyi)

Ether accept that like nature itself we are often monstrous, or do something about it (and be laughed at most likely).

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Dawg we're vegan we fucking know, we just don't want to see this shit uncensored on our feed.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh, I am not vegan. I just hate when people try and sanitize their view of the world.

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Idk how u can look at that shit and not be vegan but alright

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Do you think the people working with livestock are vegan?

I worked with cows (a dairy operation) as a young worker. I like cows, but I also know that they don't really exist in the wild as we know them.

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't think that, no, but I still can't comprehend what it must be like to live inside a brain that can be so desensitised to this cruelty.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

? Its life, its often both wonderful and cruel.

I have a hard time understanding what the inside of a mind that can not engage with reality as it is is like.

I am a big proponent of everyone at some point butchering their own food at least once.

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

To describe someone who has seen the cruelty and decided they won't stand for it as "not engaging with reality as it is" is deranged lmao

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 1 points 2 weeks ago

“not engaging with reality as it is” as in asking for photos to be censored.

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Pls put the image in a spoiler tag to stop the barrage of reports. 🙏

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That is my very point. It is not censored in wikipedia (and it should not be), why would it need that here?

If you want to ban me over it please do, but I don't think science (memes or otherwise) and censorship are compatible.

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Nah, fam. I let people have opinions, but I have to remove it. I asked nicely. It's about common courtesy, not ideology.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Fair enough, I think my point stands well with the removal. Mind if I link to the wiki article on slaughterhouses (since there will be no image)?

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That's fine. I don't mind that, I'll restore your comment if you agree to switch.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 1 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Sounds like a plan. I will change the image to a hyperlink.

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 2 points 2 weeks ago

Thanks dude. I appreciate it.

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 1 points 2 weeks ago

(You can link the original btw, just give folks a little warning first! You never know who is behind the screen.) :))

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 1 points 2 weeks ago
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›