this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2025
638 points (95.8% liked)

Technology

73758 readers
3954 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BigTrout75@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

That's what I'm thinking. There goes the Internet.

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 19 points 2 days ago (3 children)

What sucks is that once these laws are in place repealing them will probably never happen. There are far too many people who will benefit financially from this to allow that to happen.

[–] haloduder@thelemmy.club 4 points 2 days ago

They're making it so that vigilante justice is the only form of justice the ruling class can receive.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 14 points 2 days ago

Age Verification Is Coming for the Whole Corporate Internet

There, FTFY

[–] jaykrown@lemmy.world 32 points 3 days ago (4 children)

No it's not, maybe for some mainstream websites. Saying the "whole internet" is clickbait hyperbole.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

For some people "the whole internet" is like half a dozen websites.

I worked in tech support. For some people Facebook is the internet

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

They mean most of the internet for most people
Only the vast socially relevant parts of the internet

[–] laserjet@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

elite nerds who use lemmy will be able to circumvent

if the snobs are fine, why care?

those people kvetching about how the endless September ruined everything will have their wish

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 days ago

Well if they enslave everyone else, we are going to feel it too, no matter what cracks of the system we hide in

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] oozy7@lemmy.world 54 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Remember guys, they cared about the kids and their online safety as soon as Israel started a genocide in Gaza and they lost control of the narrative. But they didn't care at all for the past 20 years when Epstein and his buddies were running rampant.

edit: clarity

[–] melroy@kbin.melroy.org 287 points 4 days ago (11 children)

Hell no. Just use decentralized apps, fediverse etc. It's not about "protecting" children. It's about full control and power. So don't give up.

[–] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 69 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (10 children)

It’s about the information vacuum. Now every service will get your ID or photo, giving them both age and a whole sort of other metrics to build a profile on you. And yes, Lemmy.ca doesn’t know that about me.

[–] TheMonk@lemmings.world 40 points 4 days ago (4 children)

I gotta be honest I thought I’d never be able to quit Reddit. But it was a lot easier when I just did it. If this shit becomes the norm, I’ll back out of a site first time they try that shit and block the site. Maybe I’ll just have to stop using the internet. Wouldn’t that be a net positive on my life. You made me do this, capitalism.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 47 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (20 children)

decentralized apps, fediverse

Those apps and / or the fediverse itself would get sued into the ground and shut down one app or server at a time. There's nothing stopping any Governments authorities from going after servers inside their borders and there's nothing stopping them from "harmonizing" identity verification restrictions among other countries. They've already done it once with Intellectual Property law.

This push to de-anonymize the Internet isn't new either. Microsoft started this back in the oughts with their Passport / Digital-ID program. Google and Meta, along with others, long ago launched their own versions and it's why you can sign into so many websites with a Google or Facebook account.

It's generally referred to as IdP and now that the Internet has been fully corporatized, with minor holdouts, you can bet your bippy that the days of anonymous access are ending.

load more comments (20 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 40 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The real goal is to eliminate anonymity from the internet.

[–] renrenPDX@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago

It’s about control. They can grant you access or revoke it based on your id.

The powers at be hate that they can’t control the narrative as well as they used to so this is their solution.

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 41 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

It's fucking ironic that this article is asking me to register just to read it.

Can was please fucking stop needing accounts to exist online? So fucking dumb

[–] Teknikal@eviltoast.org 26 points 3 days ago (23 children)

I think we need to organise a massive campaign for people to cancel their entire Isp for at least a month, I'm betting all this would get reversed almost overnight.

Anything but that I fear they win and we all end up on the darknet.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Hahaha

Good luck doing that.

People can't even delay their non-essential shinies to make a statement against price gouging/raising bullshit.. You think they're gonna willingly sacrifice something like internet? for a month?

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 days ago

Gotta show me the relevant RFC for BGP first.

[–] PieMePlenty@lemmy.world 69 points 4 days ago (7 children)

If it comes to Lemmy, I quit. I'll go touch grass all day, I don't mind.

[–] sexy_peach@feddit.org 28 points 4 days ago (5 children)

I will move to freenet, i2p and tor

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 157 points 4 days ago (10 children)

Fuck that. The future fucken sucks.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Asidonhopo@lemmy.world 74 points 4 days ago

If this happens they should check ID at church too seeing as how children are much more likely to be abused or groomed by someone there.

[–] MITM0@lemmy.world 43 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

This is why the Dark-web exists.

  • Tor
  • I2P
  • Yggdrasil
  • LokiNet
  • FreeNet
  • ZeroNet
  • GNUnet (In the distant future)

Did I miss anything ?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TommySoda@lemmy.world 139 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (23 children)

And as soon as that happens, I'm out. I'd rather just opt out of the modern internet. I already have to deal with my information getting leaked from various different services at least once every couple years it seems. I can change a credit card or a password, I can't change my ID.

[–] Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.social 54 points 4 days ago (11 children)

We'll build our own Internet. With black jack and...

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)
[–] ard@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago (1 children)

this is backwards. why can't publishers mark pages as child-friendly and then browsers and operating systems can have a child-friendly mode that parents (or whoever the authoritarians are) can use. Laws can target people misusing the child-friendly mode.

[–] Coil@lemmy.world 45 points 3 days ago (3 children)

It's not about actually protecting children. It's about data.

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 16 points 3 days ago

They're using children as human shields while they attack our human rights.

[–] nickiwest@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago

This is the correct answer. Notice that they have no compunction about punishing parents who secure gender-affirming care for their trans kids, but there has been zero discussion of holding parents responsible for their kids' internet usage.

Far-right groups in the US have been crying "Big Brother" about everything for years because their whole plan has been to create a surveillance state where to gather information about dissenters. Every accusation is a confession with these people.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 25 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Get your coat, we’re leaving.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] commander@lemmy.world 88 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (4 children)

We're heading back to the dreams of the 90s with people running websites on non-standard ports and DNS (new rinky dink decentralized DNS?). Take a performance and usability hit for the return of a more decentralized Internet. Probably still more usable than the early internet with all the lessons learned and tools available to modern developers. We can also bring back the term: web master

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] zer0bitz@lemmy.world 78 points 4 days ago (9 children)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] ashenone@lemmy.ml 63 points 4 days ago

Good bye corporate internet. I won't miss you

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 28 points 4 days ago (5 children)

the simulatenous legislaiton from all countries seems very suspicious of a certain foreign adversary backing such motives. this isnt the first things like this happened. just a hunch.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›