this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2025
285 points (96.7% liked)

Showerthoughts

36426 readers
810 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It showed up out of nowhere, made the most bank in history (for a movie), refused to explain and disappeared for like 15 years, then came back out of nowhere with a sequel movie, a AAA game, and like 3 more movies in the works.

Edit: I think it now has like a Lego line too?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world 30 points 6 days ago (4 children)

it is unapologetically in favor of preserving nature, anticapitalist, and anti military. the boys from chapo trap house like it and point out that its one of the few movies with a mainstream theatrical release in which the audience is made to cheer on the blue furry hippie throwing a bunch of US marines out of a helicopter to their death.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 10 points 5 days ago

Well it had James Cameron as a director which automatically meant was going to make money. Also it was technically very impressive for the time which was kind of the point. Cameron made a huge deal of how this was a story that he'd wanted to tell for ages but hadn't been able to until the technology got to the point where he could use it.

After the movie came out there wasn't really any obvious path forward. It wasn't supposed to be a franchise it was just a movie that stood on its own. So nothing happened for years.

Then things like the volume came along and it started getting used even in TV productions, and suddenly a whole new level of capability arose and so they decided that they would make another movie only this time why stop at just one?

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 6 days ago

Man, it's just so friggin boring. I gave up on the second movie halfway through and I struggled through the first one. I don't understand why it became a global blockbuster.

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 days ago

Its a franchise built solely on spectacle, by a man who knows spectacle.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

In “How To With John Wilson” he finds an actual Avatar fan group who like to dress up as blue aliens, but it still felt super niche for a multi billion dollar film series. It’s like everyone simply forgets about it when there’s not one on in cinemas.

[–] DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz 2 points 6 days ago

I absolutely love that show but I can't recall that episode at all. Guess it's time for a rewatch!

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

The first one used some crazy tech that is now regularly part of making video games. The movie itself is rather mid, IMO (I mean, it's just Fern Gully but sci-fi instead of fantasy 🤷‍♂️), but the stuff that went into making it is fascinating as hell.

[–] Mike_Hunt@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 days ago

Semi related: i once lost an internet friend because he mentioned avatar and my dumb arse thought he was talking about the movies when he was talking about the anime

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 days ago

And a huge park section at Disneyworld

[–] Quazatron@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago (6 children)

Am I the only one here that has never seen it or understands what the hype is about?

[–] emmy67@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

It was another white saviour movie. It was very strange and not something I ever understood

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 8 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I'm going off of deteriorated memory but... space pocahontas where the natives of the planet that the humans are invading are tall blue vaguely mammalian-fish looking humanoids with a weird multipurpose tail for controlling animals and apparently also for sex according to supposed axed scene. paraplegic human uses weird technology to control the body of one or something to complete the white man saves the day even though white man cause the problem in the first place trope. I dunno about the sequel maybe he permanently stays in the alien body or something and has alien kids, who knows.

[–] Widdershins@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I watched about 5 minutes of it in an electronics store before getting bored. If I'm not mistaken it is Dances with Wolves in space. There's also a big blue guy who hangs dong.

[–] OopsOverbombing@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Dances with wolves, Ferngully, pocahontas, take your pick lol

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It's not about the story, it's about the sfx.

Watch James Cameron's movies like the abyss, Terminator2 and Titanic. (There's others as well if you want to put in more effort)

He's a visionary director and I just mean his own vision, Avatar was an idea he wanted to see on screen but was unhappy with the technology until he felt it was ready to tell the idea he had.

Like some other things, by today's standards everyone else who saw what he did have been able to refine and expand on what he did so it may seem in unremarkable, but he finally decided to do the biggie when he felt the tech had come far enough for him to do his vision and it made Bank. So. Much. Bank

Again not because it's an amazing original story, comparisons to fern gully were immediate even when it was new, but it was something that sits in a divide of how sfx can be used to tell a story in a way that people hadn't otherwise shown. Even with a really unremarkable plot

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

It was a very pretty movie

[–] vonbaronhans@midwest.social 2 points 6 days ago

There are dozens of us

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It's shit except the visuals

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 32 points 6 days ago (2 children)

It's not "shit." That's just an over correction to its relative success for its mediocrity. Excluding the visuals, it's fine. It's not stellar, not terrible, just... fine. Simple. There are plenty of worse movie plots, dialogue and acting out there. It's nowhere near unwatchable.

It's a vehicle for the visuals and technology showcasing on a basic film frame, yes. But, it's allowed to be really good at one thing and appreciated for that.

Like a plain chip in some bomb-ass dip. You could've scooped it on a dirty shoe and someone would have licked it clean. But, you gave me a plain chip instead, which is better... even if boring. So, thanks.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dil@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 days ago

They pushed ocean sims to the max in the last one, I enjoy watching cgi/vfx idrc about the plot, also the naavi are hot, tall alien baddies when

load more comments
view more: next ›