this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2025
220 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

74664 readers
2364 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 44 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I am confident that this will go poorly for them and will be keeping a supply of popcorn handy.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 35 points 1 month ago

Just a few days ago there was the post about a vibe coder where the AI deleted the production database. Let's hope this will be just as entertaining.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, it'll likely go worse for the developers. From my connections, I've heard most AI adoptions go something like this:

  • Company fires large amount of developers to "save cost" and encourrage the current developers to use the AI.
  • The remaining developers are somewhat enthusiastic about using the AI, they spend extra time to try to learn it.
  • The promise of AI slowly falls apart. Great at regenerating a copyright-washed GPL code, which would have created problems with licensing, otherwise is a barely usable garbage that has issues with following instructions. Usage starts to fall.
  • The developers that stop using it receive some form of disciplinary action for not using up their token quota management thought would be a target use. Even less developers are working on the thing.
  • The remaining skeleton crew writes python scripts to consume the LLM tokens once the novelty of Medieval English documentation wears off, also people now working overtime and multiple jobs (e.g. graphic design) to make up for the lost manpower, many delete their social media apps as the product they make is so garbage now they have to deal with constant death threats.
  • The company loses revenue, tries to blame millenial trends in internal communications. Sometimes they realize the crap they did, then make a dev team in India or similar country with cheap intellectual labor.
[–] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 5 points 1 month ago

Fuck em. Hopefully the devs they fire go off to make their own genuinely good gamea at a reasonable price and they get rich doing it!

[–] lorty@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

Considering how much revenue King brings, the crash will be glorious.

[–] moobythegoldensock@infosec.pub 43 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"Most of level design has been wiped, which is crazy since they've spent months building tools to craft levels quicker," said one employee. "Now those AI tools are basically replacing the teams. Similarly, the copywriting team is completely removing people since we now have AI tools that those individuals have been creating."

Is that surprising? All along these developers have been training their replacement.

[–] DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago (2 children)

These games should be illegal anyways. They’re basically creating an algorithm that inhibits you to influence you to pay anyways. Not a game with gameplay but an actual business and this is just the business model layered like a game.

[–] moobythegoldensock@infosec.pub 6 points 1 month ago

Yep. I assume since Candy Crush hasn’t been culturally relevant for like 10 years that it’s on its last leg anyway and this is a desperate attempt to prop up a dying company. Though I’m afraid to check though because I don’t want to see that it’s still posting record profits year after year.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I was looking for some games to pass time in waiting rooms etc and was disappointed to see even Bejeweled has 'contains ads' & 'in-app purchases' warnings on play store. Why can't I outright buy it like I already have on Steam?

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

i used to play that on my pc like 10 years ago.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 34 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Good. It’s soul crushing to think that actual humans deliberately made the crap in that app.

[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Normally I'm not a fan of AI slop, but it feels like a perfect fit here

[–] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 35 points 1 month ago

Good point. This is a pilot program for Microsoft. All negative press gets associated with King. Even the Wikipedia shows “Activision” as the parent company as if to buffer negative news from Microsoft.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 month ago

Heh; I remember when Candy Crush was just one guy and an Apple Developer account.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I thought those were generated automatically/procedurally already lol

[–] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 4 points 1 month ago

Same. As much as it sucks, how are 200 people involved in candy crush?

[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Hopefully the company also creates "A. I. " to play its games as well.

[–] Cocopanda@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Already happening.

[–] rhvg@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There are still human there?!

[–] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago

Only in a biological sense. Their sold their souls a long time ago.

[–] Quazatron@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Best of luck. Cheers.

why play candy crush when you can play antimine

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

I don't see any way this can go wrong. And even if it does, it's dead easy to rehire talent. /s

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

That tracks, it's already slopware.

[–] FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

They're getting candy CRUSHED

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

While most companies replacing employees with AI usually ends in failure for the company, I believe AI will be able to make games like this just as effectively, if not more.

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Cozy Match3 is much much awesomer

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

“If we can just get rid of all the humans, I’ll have a machine that prints me free money!”

This is all that the AI push is about. It really is that stupid. Nobody is going to ever pay for AI if they aren’t employed anymore.