this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2025
604 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

72868 readers
3020 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] paulbg@programming.dev 11 points 1 day ago

finally i'll be able to self-host one piece streaming

[–] Turret3857@infosec.pub 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Can't wait to see this bad boy on serverpartdeals in a couple years if I'm still alive

[–] Konstant@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

if I'm still alive

That goes without saying, unless you anticipate something. Do you?

my qbittorrent is gonna love that

[–] frenchfryenjoyer@lemmings.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Finally, a hard drive which can store more than a dozen AAA games

[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 day ago

Great, can't wait to afford it in 60 years.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm amazed it's only $800. I figured that shit was gonna be like 8-10 thousand.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well, it's a Seagate, so it still comes out to about a hundred bucks a month.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mrvictory1@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Me who stores important data on seagate external HDD with no backup reading the comments roasting seagate:

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zapzap@lemmings.world 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This hard drive is so big that when it sits around the house, it sits around the house.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This hard drive is so big when it moves, the Richter scale picks it up.

[–] dellish@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (4 children)

This hard drive is so big when it backs up it makes a beeping sound.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] needanke@feddit.org 9 points 1 day ago (17 children)

What is the usecase for drives that large?

I 'only' have 12Tb drives and yet my zfs-pool already needs ~two weeks to scrub it all. With something like this it would literally not be done before the next scheduled scrub.

[–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 2 points 23 hours ago

It's like the petronas towers, everytime they're finished cleaning the windows they have to start again

[–] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Jesus, my pool takes a little over a day, but I’ve only got around 100 tb how big is your pool?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] remon@ani.social 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Sounds like something is wrong with your setup. I have 20TB drives (x8, raid 6, 70+TB in use) .... scrubbing takes less than 3 days.

[–] Jimmycakes@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Data centers???

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

High capacity storage pools for enterprises.
Space is at a premium. Saving space should/could equal to better pricing/availability.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not necessarily.

The trouble with spinning platters this big is that if a drive fails, it will take a long time to rebuild the array after shoving a new one in there. Sysadmins will be nervous about another failure taking out the whole array until that process is complete, and that can take days. There was some debate a while back on if the industry even wanted spinning platters >20TB. Some are willing to give up density if it means less worry.

I guess Seagate decided to go ahead, anyway, but the industry may be reluctant to buy this.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I would assume with arrays they will use a different way to calculate parity or have higher redundancy to compensate the risk.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago

If there's higher redundancy, then they are already giving up on density.

We've pretty much covered the likely ways to calculate parity.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (4 children)

there was a time i asked this question about 500 megabytes

[–] needanke@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

I am not questioning the need for more storage but the need dor more storage without increased speeds.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SuperUserDO@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There is an enterprise storage shelf (aka a bunch of drives that hooks up to a server) made by Dell which is 1.2 PB (yes petabytes). So there is a use, but it's not for consumers.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (3 children)

That's a use-case for a fuckton of total capacity, but not necessarily a fuckton of per-drive capacity. I think what the grandparent comment is really trying to say is that the capacity has so vastly outstripped mechanical-disk data transfer speed that it's hard to actually make use of it all.

For example, let's say you have these running in a RAID 5 array, and one of the drives fails and you have to swap it out. At 190MB/s max sustained transfer rate (figure for a 28TB Seagate Exos; I assume this new one is similar), you're talking about over two days just to copy over the parity information and get the array out of degraded mode! At some point these big drives stop being suitable for that use-case just because the vulnerability window is so large that the risk of a second drive failure causing data loss is too great.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Bael422@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

It's to play Ark: Survival Evolved.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›