this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2025
511 points (96.5% liked)

Science Memes

15886 readers
2889 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

My time has come!

The above stereographic image is for cross-eyed viewing (most stereograms are wall-eyed, so you may need to put your finger in front of your screen until this one comes into focus)

This is an image of Honolulu, Hawaii, published by NASA. Note Diamond Head (the volcanic crater) in the south.

Here are some other stereopairs published by JPL:


Wheeler Ridge, California


Mount Saint Helens


Salt Lake Valley, Utah


Wellington, New Zealand

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Siegfried@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Well, its the first time that i manage to see one of these magic eye images.... but I need to ask. Most of this seem to be inverted (i see mountains as sinks, lakes and rivers are higher than peaks). Is this intended? I'm interpretint it wrong?

[–] porl@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

These ones require crossing your eyes, whereas the other type you relax them (like looking further away).

I find the other type way easier and struggle with cross eye ones. For these images you could swap the left and right portions to get it working the other way.

[–] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Actually, I made a version for wall-eyed viewing in one of the other top-level comments.

[–] porl@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Yes, I saw them afterwards. Nice work! I can do the cross eyed ones with some effort but the wall eyed ones (I didn't know the name before) I could see instantly and with far better focus.

[–] EvilBit@lemmy.world 67 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

About 21 years ago (😩) I made a stereoscopic photo for some online contest. I was pretty proud of it.

Edit: please ignore the fact that the light doesn’t match between the shots!

[–] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] EvilBit@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Thanks! It was a pain to set up the little screen trick but for what it’s worth, I won the contest!

[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Now I see it! There’s “depth” on the PDA screen too!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] CromulantCrow@lemmy.zip 36 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why do all of these look inverted to me? Like, what should be a mountain is a deep hole in the ground.

[–] dangrousperson@feddit.org 24 points 1 week ago (8 children)

These are cross-view, your probably using the focus at infinity trick instead.

[–] u_u@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 week ago

Wow, I had the same problem as the one you replied to and I thought you were making a joke I didn't get but I stand corrected. You were absolutely 100% right.

Turns out I was focusing at infinity, didn't even realize it was a different thing than crossing my eyes until I tried to cross my eyes first before focusing on the pictures...

Very cool, thanks.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 34 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (13 children)

Since some people are apparently rather salty about these being cross-eyed, despite the fact that that's just how NASA made them, here, special for y'all, a selection:

[–] DozensOfDonner@mander.xyz 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Haha sick, so cool. This is so much cooler than the old school stereograms with like a silhouet hiding in an image. How did you make these?

Idk why I can't do the cross-eyed, still wanna see if I can get that working as well

[–] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

These images were created by NASA, though you can make your own by taking two pictures about 4-5 inches apart. Try going to the Parallel View community to see more.

Also, if you know what JMOL is (a molecule viewer), you can make it show you things in stereo by right-clicking, then clicking, iirc, "scheme"-->"stereographic" or "3D"-->"wall-eyed"

[–] AdmiralRob@lemmy.zip 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Thank you so much! This is so much easier for me.

I wasn't going to complain or anything, but this post made me realize that I'm actually incapable of viewing cross-eyed. It actually hurt my eye sockets to try.

I also personally prefer wall-eyed viewing, but these just happened to be cross-eyed originally, so I was surprised by the complaints.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Boo, these are cross-view, not parallel-view.

[–] ggtdbz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 week ago (6 children)

I can still view these, but it’s much much harder for me.

I don’t know why parallel isn’t the default.

[–] Maestro@fedia.io 13 points 1 week ago (6 children)

It varies per person. I for one can't view wall-eyed, only cross-eyed.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] AnyOldName3@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Lots of people can really easily go cross-eyed and look at these with no practice whatsoever. Fewer people can do the parallel kind with no practice or with the amount of practice they've already done.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago

I grew up with the Magic Eye books and have never been able to do cross-view as a result.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] lmuel@sopuli.xyz 21 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Not sure why but those NEVER work for me lol

Not this, not magic eye books, absolutely nothing works.

Tried for many hours back in the day

[–] AbnormalHumanBeing@lemmy.abnormalbeings.space 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I can only do parallel-view, not crosseyed, those look so surreal that way (inverted height/depth basically)

[–] Jikiya@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Is that why I'm seeing things that way? Don't understand the difference really, but is really odd to see Mt St Helens as a sinkhole instead.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AngryPancake@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago

I tried so long I tried every method, never worked for me. Then eventually I found an image that made it work for me

https://i.redd.it/25c330mmohu51.jpg

(Sorry for the Reddit link). How I do it: put your phone screen right before your nose and unfocus your eyes. Then, don't move your eyes, don't move your focus, but slowly move the phone away from your face. At about 10-20cm distance, you should be able to see a squirrel with a nut in its hands.

After that it became very easy to do other pictures simply by knowing what to expect (an actual 3d image).

That being said the one above is really hard.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Zacryon@feddit.org 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

How to make people on the internet staring at their phones like this:

Worked well for me. Cool stuff!

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

In feudal Japon, 19th century, a photographer made a lot of photos from the people in 3D to use in a viewer, hand colored.

(Converted to gif, to see the 3D effect without eye acrobatics)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 week ago

!crossview@lemmy.world

It’s not very active, but still has good content.

[–] hawgietonight@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

For some reason I'm getting the depth inverted. Mt. Saint Helens looks like a hole in the ground.

[–] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You're doing "wall eyed" viewing. These are for "cross-eyed" viewing. "Wall-eyed" means your eyes are focusing at a point behind the image. You need to cross your eyes for these. Try putting your finger in between your screen and your eyes, varying the distance until the dots merge. Then, remove your finger, focusing on the image itself. That should allow for cross-eyed viewing.

[–] JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago (6 children)

That's so weird, I always thought I was crossing my eyes when doing this...

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ter_maxima@jlai.lu 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

These are all backwards. The eyes are reversed so everything that's supposed to be a hole looks like a bump and vice-versa.

EDIT : TIL about cross v wall eyed. I dont understand why they would do it this way though ? The image is much less stable, and moving it at all completely breaks the effect. Wall-eyed really allows you to move and observe details without breaking.

[–] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago (8 children)

You're doing "wall eyed" viewing. These are for "cross-eyed" viewing. "Wall-eyed" means your eyes are focusing at a point behind the image. You need to cross your eyes for these. Try putting your finger in between your screen and your eyes, varying the distance until the dots merge. Then, remove your finger, focusing on the image itself. That should allow for cross-eyed viewing.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kernelle@0d.gs 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I love these so much thanks! On YouTube there's also a ton in video format, like this one by Brian May.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 4_degrees@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] narshok@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You dumb bastard, it's not a schooner it's a sailboat.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] orgrinrt@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Really can’t seem to understand how this works.

Never did any “magic eyes” or whatever books as a kid, so maybe I just don’t have any practice in this, but whether I try to cross my eyes focusing beyond the screen, or “above” the screen, I can’t get the resulting middle image to look like anything other than a blur.

Perhaps my eyes are somehow odd on the other hand. I don’t need glasses though, so I’m a bit skeptical that’s it.

I tried all the guides I found in this thread, including the floating hot dogs, attempting varying distances both with the screen and the finger, then trying the wall-eyed variants too for all of them, none of them work for me.

So odd. It seems it should work. No idea what I am doing wrong here.

Or is this the joke? To get people to squint for minutes on end on their screen?

I promise this isn't a troll. In your case, it may be that your eyes are having difficulty focusing on nonexistent objects. If they're blurry, it's not that your eyes aren't crossing, but rather that they are out-of-focus. Eyes naturally focus the lenses to bring near or distant objects into clarity, but when I was first doing magic eye images a long time ago, it also took me a while to convince my eyes that they needed to focus on the images.

My guess is that, since the actual images are on the screen at distance A, but your eyes are crossing as if they're looking at distance B, your eyes are auto-focusing for objects at B, but the images are still actually at A, so they appear out-of-focus.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Ludrol@szmer.info 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Isn't magic eye something different? I thout it was !autostereograms@lemmy.world instead of cross view images.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] multifariace@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

I miss r/crossview and the short love r/crossviewnsfw. Damn greed ruining everything good in the world.

load more comments
view more: next ›