this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2025
33 points (97.1% liked)

Canada

10122 readers
952 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

  2. Misinformation is not welcome here.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lemonySplit@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Gee sure would be nice if that DST went thru for some extra revenue without cuts... 🤦‍♂️

[–] Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Canada total spending is $450B

But $120B of that is discretionary excluding transfer payments.

So we're looking at a whole of government reduction of $18B for 15%. Transport Canada spends $25B on roads.

Stop subsidizing inefficient personal vehicles by making people absorb the real costs of them and we can make that cut in seconds.

[–] TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I agree, but unfortunately that's basically never going to happen. At least not in our lifetimes.

One of Canada's greatest flaws is that we followed the US into car-dependent, suburban-sprawl at the catastrophic expense of everything else. We have spent decade upon decade investing unfathomable amounts of money into building the most dysfunctional cities imaginable and ensuring there is no practical way of getting in or out of them except a car.

[–] Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

We built car dependancy starting in 60, though about 80 in ernest.

We fucked our cities over 40-60 years, and we're seeing the turning point happen in real time right now. Most cities have the policies in place now, or coming in the next 5 years.

On the roads side there's a 45 year lag for recapitalization. On the construction side, harder to tell.

It won't happen in my lifetime, but it will happen in my kid's.

Stay the course and we can do it.

[–] nocklobster@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I’m going to sound like a moron asking this, but if the country makes over 2 trillion per year, and we are only spending 4 some-odd billion per year, shouldn’t we be able to get out of debt while staying afloat over time?

[–] Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Because we tax ~0.44T on our 2.2T GDP. Or about 20%.

[–] nocklobster@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Ah ok so if I’m understanding this, the 2.2T we make is all of our collective earnings, which we then get taxed on, which in turn pays for our services and those who help keep things going (i.e. police, firefighters, gov workers) and such ALONG WITH paying down the debt and building up the infrastructure where it’s needed?

[–] Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Exactly. Consider it like family X making $220,000 combined income, but paying $44,000 in federal taxes. The remaining $176 is the family's money to spent (at least before the provincial tax slice).

Edit: and to be clear, $440B is federal taxes. Some of the things you mentioned are paid for by provincial or municipal taxes.

[–] grte@lemmy.ca 20 points 2 days ago

Cutting off your leg is tough but doable.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I have a really hard time believing these cuts aren't going to hurt services. They're saying they aren't going to lay off public servants, which suggests to me that it'll be the actual service delivery that'll take the hit.

[–] alsimoneau@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago

They're absolutely saying it will hurt services.

[–] casmael@mander.xyz 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

What’s this guy’s deal, man. I thought he was supposed to be an economist?

[–] Arkouda@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 days ago

What’s this guy’s deal, man. I thought he was supposed to be an economist?

Do Economists never cut spending?

[–] teppa@piefed.ca 5 points 1 day ago

Dont worry, he wont be cutting the Bank of Canada's funding, nor the billions in mortgage bonds the Bank of Canada is buying to inflate home values for his stock portfolio. It will be the less important things like health transfers and child benefits.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

Saving the economy will need more spending, even if some efficiencies in government is fine. Don't hear about anything about economic boosting other than dead ender energy pipelines.

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Doable is a real word now?

[–] puppinstuff@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Language evolves constantly. If people use a word and can understand its meaning and context then it’s a perfectly cromulent option.

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I don’t disagree. I’ve been saying it since like… 2005. Seeing the CBC use it feels weird though. 🤷‍♂️

[–] jszym@cosocial.ca 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

@Mongostein @slykethephoxenix earliest recorded use is from the 15th century, but it's likely from the 12th.

https://www.oed.com/dictionary/doable/_adj#6341248

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Now that’s interesting

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As an allophone: it isn't?