this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2025
735 points (99.3% liked)

Fuck AI

3526 readers
911 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Source (Bluesky)

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 203 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] brown_guy45@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Where do y'all even get these memes from

I'm gonna save it for future purposes

[–] jackr@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 week ago

We really need to just start sending texts.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 160 points 1 week ago (1 children)

TIL "frightningly efficient" == wasting kilowatts of power on something that could've been five paragraphs of text...

[–] 18107@aussie.zone 84 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This apocalypse could have been an email.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

hold on my AI assiststant is taking notes on that

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 74 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The funny thing is that if a person can replace themself with an incompetent AI bot for your meeting, maybe your meeting was a giant waste of time!

In other words, yes this use of AI is absurd, but so was the meeting itself. Well hey, I guess manglement will always love up to its name.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 20 points 1 week ago

I mean, one person or a few replaced by bots could be a lack of professionalism on the attendees' part. All of them? You suck and nobody has time for your bullshit.

[–] Pieisawesome@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 week ago

The person said this is a webinar, which probably means attendance is optional…

[–] moakley@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

It makes sense to me. Different people might need to get different things out of the meeting.

Sometimes at work I'll need one piece of information, but it's contained in a thirty minute presentation. Or I might not know how much information I need, so I'll start with a summary. If that's not enough, I'll watch a recording of the presentation.

[–] lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 61 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Why even have more than one note taker? Just have one and send the mail to everyone or write the mail yourself for gods sake

[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago

So we can waste more resources

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If I were running an AI, and I saw 25 people each pointing their note taking bots at the same webinar, I'd have it do the work once, and send it to each of them.

There is no reason to think that each of these 25 note taking bots is working separately and simultaneously on the exact same task.

[–] lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 1 week ago (10 children)

I honestly don't know how this works. If it's a built in feature of the platform, sure. If it's a bot that's independent and from the view of the platform just another user that saves the notes locally, it might not even be easy to exchange the notes afterwards if they recognize each other and are the same (there might be different bots for the same task, as I said, I don't know)

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] nul9o9@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

My work uses one ai summerizer for all attendees that gets sent out with the recording.

Giving people their own is just stupid.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I like to have a group of people forced to listen to me. Makes me feel a little better about myself for a few minutes.

[–] lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 week ago

My niece talks to her stuffed animals. Maybe that's an option?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 59 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There probably arent even any "participants" behind those bots. The AI companies have exhausted all the written content on the internet, so now they are scraping video and audio data. I wouldnt be surprised if that is exactly what those bots are doing. Either thats their primary job, or their secondary job that the actual participants dont even know about.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

If this isn't true, I hope they don't read this and take this idea because goddamn.

Edit: Actually, I just thought about it again and I do not care.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 49 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] ErrorCode@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I had the same thought! "Isn't that what happened in Real Genius?!"

Thanks, I was trying to think of what movie that was from.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 44 points 1 week ago

The big waste of resources is not the 25 separate connections to a high-bandwidth video call. That's kind of minor. The big waste is these 25 bots running separate LLM queries each.

[–] rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)

jesus christ alexandre why don’t you grow a fucking sack and boot anyone who “shows up” like this.

[–] rockerface@lemmy.cafe 27 points 1 week ago

Because their entire job likely is selling these kinds of "solutions" to people

[–] protist@mander.xyz 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My organization and most of the other orgs I work with have all banned AI note takers in meetings. We either don't let them in or boot them at the beginning. Some of the people who send them, I haven't seen them actually show up to a meeting in months.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago

Really? Ours just ok'd the use of them with external client meetings and have been using them internally for a year. I do not use it, but everyone else does because "it's the future, you'll get left behind!" Everyday, I feel like im taking the crazy pills.

[–] BroBot9000@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yeah but think of the potential money the Ai company de jure made while guzzling more water than Ai fanboys guzzle corporates sloppy seconds.

[–] SilverShark@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I don't even know why we talk with other people in companies anymore. We can't send emails because people don't read them. So we are drowning in calls where we include the whole team where we talk about our weekends for 5 minutes at the start and spend half talking about what could have been a email. So on top we have bots that do these summaries so people can be sitting on calls only paying half attention to then not read the summaries anyway.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (8 children)

The only real solution is to actually care enough about the work to read the email. The trouble is that so many companies these days do meaningless middleman shit that people couldn't give a fuck about. We're headed straight for an economy substantially consisting of work that doesn't matter, largely being done by bots that can't think properly.

... Which would be fine I guess, as long as the ruling class would be so good as to offer a substantial sinecure to the populace. But instead they will likely insist that we quietly die someplace they don't have to watch.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Half of the participants don't contribute anything, but need to look busy so they have to lengthen the call with inane banter.

Most of my emails have nothing to do with me, but everyone is CCing me on stuff, just in case I might be relevant somehow. Particularly and they made a convenient distribution list that includes 300 people and people send to it all the time. Someone I've never heard of on the other side of the world was going to be unavailable because they were sick and I get an email. The automated test for some project I have nothing to do with failed again last night and I get an email. Every morning I am greeted with about 100 emails that happened overnight. Even the handful of threads where I have some relevance, it goes off topic and I have no idea if I'm relevant to the new message or not until I read it.

Corporate communication is just screwed.

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I will spend part or my Monday setting up 2 meetings to follow up people who didn’t answer the message I sent them last week. I need a simple data from one, and a 2 minute task from the other.

This is a company I joined 3 years ago, and was baffled in the first weeks how nobody answers their emails, not even IT. So I started sending MS Teams messages like others, and that worked well so far, but now they also seem to have lost efficiency.

Work would be easier if everybody just respected others enough to answer their messages. We don’t need to be best friends, just pls everybody do your job…

Edit: even better, if I didn’t have to chase people for simple data and giving acces rights to a bunch of non-confidential shit that is gatekeeped like trade secrets

[–] pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 week ago

Lmao I would have read emails if I wasn't drowning in irrelevant emails and they forced us to switch to outlook which not only got rid of all the automated filtering and sorting I had setup but also lacked the features to recreate them. I used to be on top of email and slack channels but they just added so much mandatory shit that I just couldn't wade through anymore. So, "We can't send emails because people don't read them" in my experience has been a management problem, not an employee problem. This was Oracle though, and they're particularly bad at treating employees as human beings

[–] Sergio@slrpnk.net 13 points 1 week ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] zerofk@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 week ago

When meetings are held between people from half a dozen countries spread over three continents, none of whom are speaking their native language and all using uncommon product and project names, then AI summaries are occasionally hilarious and nearly always wildly incorrect.

[–] pixxelkick@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Sorta just sounds like you can probably fire a few employees who don't give a fuck.

From experience, a lot of companies tend to be propped up by like 10% of their developers doing 90% of the work, maybe 50% of developers doing the last 10%, and then like 40% of developers either doing fuck all or actively harming the codebases and making more work for the other 60%.

And more often than not, these people are the ones sending stuff like "AI Note Takers" merely to give the illusion of existing.

In reality you have like three devs who actually care and do most of the work having a discussion and like 10 to 30 AFK participants with their cameras off who probably arent even listening or care.

And the thing is, it shows later. The same devs have zero clue wtf is going on, they have zero clue how to do their job, and they constantly get their code sent back or they plague up some codebase that doesnt have reviewers to catch them.

The AI note takers are just the new version of people showing up to meetings with their camera off and never speaking a word.

Except now they burn orders of magitude more power to do it, which is awful.

[–] towerful@programming.dev 9 points 1 week ago

From experience, a lot of companies tend to be propped up by like 10% of their developers doing 90% of the work, maybe 50% of developers doing the last 10%, and then like 40% of developers either doing fuck all or actively harming the codebases and making more work for the other 60%.

Hello, how do I join the 40%?
I want to coast for a while

[–] underscores@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago

agree on everything except I hate turning my camera on, fuck that

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm with you on a lot of even most developers at a company making things worse rather than better.

However if for some reason a webinar is only going to be "live" with no recording to be provided, and further it may be a pointless session you don't need but work mandates, then I would be firing off whatever recording/transcription/summarization they allow me. Like my employer has manated every employee regardless of job attending 60 hours of AI webinars in the year, to give the illusion of being in tune with AI without bothering to actually have a plan. Mostly it's been people rambling without any actionable stuff trying to sound smart, absolutely every bit of it has been superficial, the speakers at best have toyed with prompts and read articles saying Nvidia gpus are useful. Not one of them have so much as even run a local model. There's nothing in these 60 mandated hours that will do anything but waste time.

Even for mandatory "all hands" where we can't all questions but at least I want to know what they are thinking, I'll get a recording and watch it at 2x speed.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Reminds me of something...

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Then you have bots presenting to bots. :)

NGL... I'd send an AI note taker to summarize then 9/10 times delete the summary after skimming it for 3 seconds.

load more comments
view more: next ›