this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2025
16 points (86.4% liked)

Videos

16224 readers
336 users here now

For sharing interesting videos from around the Web!

Rules

  1. Videos only
  2. Follow the global Mastodon.World rules and the Lemmy.World TOS while posting and commenting.
  3. Don't be a jerk
  4. No advertising
  5. No political videos, post those to !politicalvideos@lemmy.world instead.
  6. Avoid clickbait titles. (Tip: Use dearrow)
  7. Link directly to the video source and not for example an embedded video in an article or tracked sharing link.
  8. Duplicate posts may be removed

Note: bans may apply to both !videos@lemmy.world and !politicalvideos@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The exact logic behind why in the world they thought this would be a good idea will be a better question answered in court

I sympathize with the guy's situation but that's a hell of a bait and switch headline, no explanation of what happened there is offered beyond it

[โ€“] sheridan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I interpreted that as the guy didn't know what the reason was yet.

I initially thought the HOA was implying physical threats towards their residents with the images, but on second viewing it looks like the HOA board originally received those images in their inbox. (If you pause and zoom in you'll see those images came from anonymous senders to the HOA.) Maybe the HOA is claiming one of the residents threatened the HOA board with those images?