this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19047 readers
4040 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

From threatening cage matches to backing RFK Jr., billionaires prove too much money detaches a person from reality

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] theyresocool@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Who thought giving trust fund kids a bunch of tax payer dollars was a good idea LOL

[–] BobbyBandwidth@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I worked for a trust fund kid. It started off great until I realized he had no understanding of how money worked. Despite him saying / thinking he cared about the bottom line and the well being of the company, he really only cared about his ego and if his (rich) family thought he was successful.

[–] lingh0e@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I worked for a guy who was given his family's company. When I told him my 4th birthday was approaching he tried to relate to me by asking if I was getting a boat over 40 ft because "a man's age should never be less than his age.". Because not only did he think I had a massive boat, he also thought I would buy a new one as I grew older.

This guy also refused to hire actual employees if he didn't have to. Everyone was "temp".

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

The only thing really bad about their outlook, is it's not true for everyone.

UBI is basically "trust funds for all"

If everyone had a guaranteed income that would cover living expenses, a bunch of people wouldn't be so hyper fixated on money

[–] stanleytweedle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Really glad to see this take. Nobody balks at the idea that 'hoarding' is a mental health issue when poor people do it. It's about time we recognize obscene wealth is bad for everyone in society, including the people who hold it.

[–] 30isthenew29@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe things would change if the billionaires were convinced it’s bad for themselves.

[–] stanleytweedle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It would, but they won't.

[–] EfficaciousSkink@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

In addition to taxation, make them share their wealth with all of their employees. Their working people deserve the money more than the government.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

The workers should control the means of production. Imagine if every worker owned a stake in the company they worked for and got to vote on corporate decisions...

[–] SomethingBurger@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ideally, tax money would be spent by the government in a way that benefits workers.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Walmart employees get a ton of welfare money but are still mistreated. It would be better for the workers if they had a say in how the company was run, rather than getting their employment subsidized by tax money.

[–] cheeseblintzes@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I was making $15/hr at Walmart over the pandemic when I just couldn’t stand to be at home anymore.

I was STILL on food stamps and had Medicaid.

It’s asinine, I’m not even mad they fucked with the heiresses boat in Ibiza.