this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2025
39 points (97.6% liked)

Mildly Interesting

21199 readers
147 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Doom@ttrpg.network 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sounds to me like they didn't care to speak to their aunt and weren't involved in her life, now they want cash.

Blood of the creed is thicker than the water of the womb.

[–] huppakee@feddit.nl 13 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I bet if the male escort wasn't a male escort but a caring neighbour the family would still come for money, doesn't read like the nature of their relationship is a problem. They should be grateful for the escort that their aunt had company, considering how awful loneliness is.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world -1 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Did you read the text messages?!

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

He could have spent their whole time together just helicoptering right in front of her face and he would still be more deserving of the bequest.

[–] huppakee@feddit.nl 6 points 21 hours ago

Not sure what you mean, shows their relationship was not only about sex/intimacy and actually support my point?

[–] vinceman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Idk about these other comments but those text messages are fucked.

[–] huppakee@feddit.nl 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

What's so fucked about them?

[–] vinceman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

The part about a male escort telling an elderly person how to manage finances? Idk guess elder abuse has different definitions for different people.

[–] huppakee@feddit.nl 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

It sounds sketchy, but the text show she herself asks about it and for me that answer doesn't come across as manipulative or him trying to profit off of her. It would be more worrying if he'd answer something like 'o that car? You could let me use it' or 'I can sell that for you'. I think it's wrong to assume all old people are vulnerable confused and sick, and also wrong to assume a sex workers has less moral values because of the way they choose to make a living. I think the way they communicate show that a) she has a sound mind and b) he treats her honestly like a friend and not as a target or victim.

Have you also read she lives in Canada while the claimants live in Australia and waited four years to voice their concerns? That says a lot too I believe.

[–] vinceman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Per the article

The texts included in the affidavit covered a wide range of topics, including Henry's diet, health, financial matters and even the pair's differing views on the COVID-19 pandemic.

"Good morning Simon, you are going to be horrified but I am getting the vaccine. I'm hesitant but it has to be done," Henry wrote in one exchange.

"It's too bad you don't listen to anyone with common sense. I have tried to tell you in very plain detail but you don't seem to want to listen. So I think you are gambling with your life," Garstin replied.

But go off about how they lived in Australia, or is it reasonable to tell a elderly woman that she's better off without a life saving vaccine.