this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2025
70 points (97.3% liked)

World News

36407 readers
1070 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Grumpyleb@lemmus.org 43 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

People need to remember that Israel started this, pre emptively with US backing.

[–] tastemyglaive@lemmy.ml 21 points 21 hours ago

For sure. People who take a sports gambler's approach to geopolitics are pushing the angle Iran shouldn't have waited for such provocations. In fact many are calling for non-combatants to be struck. I think taking out public utilities is sufficient to make them flee. Since they have already cut off everything to Gaza, it should be done.

[–] Libra@lemmy.ml 16 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

That's twice now they've threatened to attack US bases and twice they haven't done it, this is starting to seem like a negotiating tactic rather than a threat.

[–] Z_Poster365@hexbear.net 0 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Iran still trying to negotiate means they are cooked

[–] cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml 7 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

They could believe in their longterm capacity for success in a war with Israel and the US but still want to avoid all of the destruction that would entail. If they blow up Saudi oil fields, close the straits of hormuz, and attack US bases then any hope of deescalation is lost.

[–] Z_Poster365@hexbear.net 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Hope of deescalation is already lost. Join us in reality where Iran has just entered existential total war with a genocidal entity.

[–] cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

If that were true Iran would have almost certainly taken some of the actions I've described. They're trying to use that as a threat to get the US to back down and reign in their attack dog.

[–] Z_Poster365@hexbear.net 3 points 8 hours ago

Nothing will cause the US or Israel to back down except extreme overwhelming violent force

[–] Libra@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 hours ago

Yeah, although they have now pulled out of talks with the US about a new nuclear deal, so maybe they're done?

[–] godlessworm@hexbear.net 9 points 19 hours ago

destroy the satanic zionist regime

[–] culpritus@hexbear.net 13 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (2 children)

Trump was trying to force a deal with Israel playing as the tough guy, but he didn't expect Iran to negotiate in kind with their own show of immense strength in response to the bullying.

[–] Z_Poster365@hexbear.net 15 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Israel went a little overkill if they were just trying to give a warning shot to Iran to pressure negotiations. They wiped out multiple levels of leadership, nuclear sites, missile sites. This is not a warning, it's the opening salvo of a full on existential total war.

Trump knows there's no "deal". It's bullshit. Holden Bloodfeast's quest is the quest of all DC. This is a project decades in the making. Syria was destroyed for this. Get the correct perspective. This isn't about Trump or "deals" this is about the imperialist project to destroy all opposition to the entity.

[–] Libra@lemmy.ml 6 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

They wiped out multiple levels of leadership, nuclear sites, missile sites. This is not a warning, it’s the opening salvo of a full on existential total war.

Yes to military leadership - at least two high-ranking military leaders are known to have been killed in this strike so far and probably more will be announced soon - and maybe to the missile sites. But not so much to the nuclear sites: experts say damage there is limited.

[–] Z_Poster365@hexbear.net 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

My point still stands. This was not a "warning" from Israel. This was the opening salvo of total war.

[–] Libra@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 hours ago

I don't disagree, I was just providing additional information.

[–] Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net 14 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

America and Israel are used to enemies who can't fight back; this is why before the government invaded Iraq they made absolutely sure Iraq didn't have WMDs. There's a good reason they're not gonna pick that fight with North Korea.

[–] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 hours ago

There’s a good reason they’re not gonna pick that fight with North Korea.

Hopefully you mean the fact that China would not allow it which is also why North Korea exists in the first place. Because it absolutely isn't North Korea's nuclear capability.

[–] Z_Poster365@hexbear.net 10 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I used to think this was ironclad, but now American proxies are blowing up Russian strategic bombers with CIA help alongside terrorist attacks targeting passenger trains and civilian bridges. Shouldn't Russia having nukes prevent this kind of bullshit? It used to, but the crazies in the west seem to have passed the point of no return.

[–] Libra@lemmy.ml 10 points 18 hours ago

I dunno if you're old enough to remember the Cold War, but both sides having nukes definitely did not stop the US and Russia from fucking with each other, shooting down aircraft, bombing shit, and especially spying and sabotage. All it stopped is open warfare, but even then it's debatable since we had several proxy wars.

[–] ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world 13 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

It is an American proxy war, after all. Everyone knows Taiwan is to East Asia what Israel is to West Asia...

[–] tastemyglaive@lemmy.ml 11 points 22 hours ago

The Israelis are there to mitigate the US shipping bodybags across the Atlantic. They should have taken a lesson from years of the Ukraine proxy war

[–] lemmyseizethemeans@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 20 hours ago

Here we go.