Fuck AI

The artist has shared two iterations of their painting, and you can flick through their post history to see them honing their skills over five years, including more art on the same clothed-mice theme, also with multiple versions.

~~Using an AI tool uncritically on !fuck_ai@lemmy.world to accuse a genuine artist of using AI is not really in the spirit of the community, IMO.~~ Edit: miscommunication -- OP was spotlighting the mistake made by the detection tool, not accusing the artist of using AI.

There's a few things here that tell me it's probably not copyright-theft-generated. The big one that's easy to explain is the tail. The tail starts off from behind the mouse, snakes in front of the cloak and background (so far so good), but then, here's the critical thing, passes behind the fern staff and continues on the other side of it, positioned properly and in continuity.

Copyright-theft-generators have tremendous problems with this because, as the chorus goes, they don't understand anything. There is no mental model of "a tail" with them. There is no thought of a tail's properties, so keeping a tail contiguous while passing across barriers is very hard for them.

WasItAI is a powerful AI-powered tool designed to detect AI-generated images. It helps users differentiate between real and fake images, ensuring the integrity of visual content. WasItAI uses advanced algorithms to analyze the characteristics and patterns within an image. By comparing these features against a vast database of real and AI-generated images, it can accurately detect the image's origin.

There've been proofs (scientific papers) that what we call AI currently can't really do that

The problem with “AI detectors” is that they are, themselves, AI and highly prone to just “making shit up.” They cannot be trusted to be accurate and cannot even explain the “reasons” for their appraisals. These tools are hurting real creators, including artists and students, and should not be used IMO.

AI detectors are not really accurate as I understand it.

Posting about using an ai on this is community is certainly a choice, I’ll give you that.

OP is catching some grief for using an AI AI-detection tool, but I also use an AI AI-detection tool when I'm not sure, and I'm wondering we else we can do? The supposed AI image-generators are getting better, five fingers and all, and I'm not art critic enough to always be certain. It's a problem that'll only get worse as the fake artmakers get better.

I will say, AI AI-detection and then rejection is the only use I've found for AI.

I think they used nightshade or something, that makes it stand out as AI created to AI detectors