this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2025
245 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

71313 readers
6204 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts 143 points 4 days ago (6 children)

It’s dead and they’re replacing it with an AI-first browser. Gross.

If you want the main things Arc gives you (vertical tabs, tab groups), you can get them with Firefox or a Firefox spinoff like Librewolf.

[–] simple@piefed.social 88 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Zen browser is basically FireFox made to look like Arc

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 35 points 4 days ago (16 children)

Zen made sense until Firefox rolled out vertical tabs, but there's little reason to endure all the growing pains and bugs now you can set up basically the exact same thing directly on FF.

[–] Pirata@lemm.ee 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I... Think Zen offers a bit more than just vertical tabs over Firefox.

Plus, the vertical bar looks really fat compared to the top bar on Firefox, for no reason.

Yes, I am fat-shaming the vertical bar. It has no right to be that fat compared to the rest of the UI.

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Hah. Well, that and a good fullscreen browser for OLED displays were my main motivations. Both of those are addressed by FF now.

Also, the vertical bar can be set to whatever width you want on both, I think. On FF (which is what I'm typing this in, so I can check) you can shrink it down so it only displays a single row of icons.

The idea is to hide it altogether when you're not using it, in any case, but you can definitely make it as skinny or skinnier than tthe top bar.

[–] Pirata@lemm.ee 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

you can shrink it down so it only displays a single row of icons.

I'm aware of this, but even that single row of icons is very fat compared to the rest of the bars that exist on the browser (e.g. the window bar, the bookmarks bar, the search bar, etc). It just looks out of place.

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

You made me count, because I could have sworn it was thinner than the top bar, but it's a bit more complicated than that. On a 4K display the single-icon vertical tabs on Firefox are 75 pixels wide. The horizontal tabs bar is a sliver narrower, at 65 pixels tall. Of course that stacks on top of the address bar, which itself is 60 pixels tall, so you end up with 125 pixels of top bar.

I don't know if I could notice the 10 px difference between the two, given that they're in different orientations and 10 pixels is 0.5% of the horizontal pixel count and 0.3% of the vertical, but human perception is weird. Like I said, I keep the bar much wider to read the titles and just... hide it when I'm not tabbing, so it's not an issue at all for me. Although I'll say that even with the wide sidebar deployed you get a pretty comfy square-ish space to work with that turns a 16:9 display to 16:10 in a satisfying way. And on ultrawide 21:9 it's a no-brainer, just like having a side-aligned taskbar (hear that, Windows 11?).

I should add that none of that changes that Firefox is... quite ugly in general. Zen is definitely sleeker at a glance, regardless of your setup.

[–] Pirata@lemm.ee 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Haha, it's funny that you went that far. I think the reason why I notice it and you don't, is the 4k factor. My screen is 1920x1200 iirc.

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 1 points 13 hours ago

Heh, what can I say, nerding out about UI design is definitely part of my general dysfunction.

But yeah, if you're already in a 19:10 display you generally won't want the sidebar as much because you already have a naturally taller display, so your workspace is shaped the same as mine when you use horizontal and I use vertical. It's probably more a problem of proportions that sizes.

Which, hey, is why being able to have a vertical and horizontal tabs option is good. We're in a world where browsers need to fit not just horizontal and vertical displays on PCs and phones, but a whole bunch of screen aspect ratios.

[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Zen also attempts to remove the telemetry that firefox has baked in.

But Zen also has features other than just vertical tabs that are really useful, like Glance.

[–] supersockpuppet@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago

I really like the split view in Zen. I wish it supported drag and dropping links across pages but it's still handy.

[–] JustARaccoon@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Firefox vertical tabs are lackluster though, you don't have pinned and essential tabs on FF, and you also miss out on Glance (the pop out link feature), basically the main features it copied from Arc. Honestly it's been very stable for me, and it's matured enough that I'd recommend giving it another shot.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 10 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Zen is a lot more than just vertical tabs. And I have never run into any "pains and bugs".

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works 77 points 4 days ago (2 children)

No shit it died. They stopped supporting it and on top of it it’s a browser that requires you to be logged into an account to use, which is a turnoff to techie people who are the most likely to adopt nee things early.

Oh and Microsoft Edge can do most of the things Arc does.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 28 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Yep. Save reason I won't use Kagi and I don't use AI much. Surveillance capitalism will only ever lead to authoritarianism and dystopia. I don't want anything to do with it.

You can't trust any company to not sell you out and pick your carcass clean.

[–] farcaller@fstab.sh 22 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Isn’t kagi's point that they store very little about you to the point there no search history and you have to pay for the service provided?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 14 points 4 days ago

Can you cite me some instances of surveillance from Kagi? Genuinely asking.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] viking@infosec.pub 26 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Never heard of that thing, but apparently it was Apple exclusives? Deserved death then.

I'm hoping ladybug will be operational for mainstream use, before the enshittification of Firefox progresses too far.

[–] MITM0@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Eyedust@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 days ago (4 children)

It wasn't supposed to stay Apple exclusive. In fact, when I last used Windows there was a beta build out for Arc. However, there were also multiple Firefox styles in the CSS Store that made Firefox into Arc.

Then Zen Browser came out, and I'm currently watching it get very popular. I don't doubt that Zen Browser is one of the reasons Arc is shutting down. It's nearly an exact copy, but now with more features (and is constantly coming out with even more faster than Arc can think of them).

I'm excited for Ladybird as well, but I'm not expecting anything crazy when it comes out of alpha and beta. I fully expect to wait a bit, maybe download to contribute some troubleshooting, but it may not be viable as a main use browser for a long time yet.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Tungsten5@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago

Its not apple exclusive. I have it on both my macbook and windows computer

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] obsolete@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 3 days ago (8 children)

When I eventually managed to test Arc, I felt it was a very overhyped browser. I couldn't see what the fuss was about.

load more comments (8 replies)

This was the browser that required an account to even start using, it was just ridiculous.

[–] Goodtoknow@lemmy.ca 29 points 4 days ago

Zen Browser is open source and in active development!

[–] db2@lemmy.world 34 points 4 days ago

Never even heard of it until now.

[–] utopiah@lemmy.world 23 points 4 days ago (1 children)

No Linux build, not git link, why would anyone care?

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 10 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Because 96% of people aren't using Linux to browse the web.

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 18 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

That figure is entirely irrelevant when you need to target users who are willing to try a new unknown third party browser in the first place.
And you'll find orders of magnitude more of those among Linux users than you do on Mac, which is where Arc launched on.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] OmegaLemmy@discuss.online 26 points 4 days ago

what a fucking joke, the best thing it did was create the zen browser project, and before that Vivaldi existed that took the spot of zen without the hype

[–] bitwolf@sh.itjust.works 18 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It probably has something to do with being only available on Macs for so long.

[–] Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 3 days ago

Or them completely shifting development to their AI browser

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 18 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

The Browser Company, the developer behind the Arc Browser, has announced that Arc is going away

Where? Where did they do this? Why is there no link? They said several times, very recently, that it was not going away. They were just basically going into maintenance mode.

please know this: we’re not trying to shut Arc down.

- 2 weeks ago

[–] biggerbogboy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

The Devs at the browser company said themselves that they aren't killing Arc, it's just on maintenance mode as they are working on another browser, an AI first one, which I have mixed feelings about personally.

[–] Lederrucksack@feddit.org 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That's very sad to hear. I am currently using Arc as my main browser for work (I am a web developer) since its launch on MacOS. Guess I need to switch browsers soon then...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So, no Windows, no Linux, no head?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›