It sounds sensationalist to say "we hit the highest CO2 levels ever recorded" when we break the record every year and will continue to do so for the foreseeable future
A Boring Dystopia
Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.
Rules (Subject to Change)
--Be a Decent Human Being
--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title
--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article
--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.
--Posts must have something to do with the topic
--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.
--No NSFW content
--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world
Doesn't make it any less true or alarming
They really should learn how to run their vertical axis down to zero . I see no need to risk the accusation of using graphs with a lie factor. it'll still look a dramatic increase starting a zero. They can even add a horizontal line at lowest recorded level if they want to emphasize that difference. They're also open to a bit of criticism on the time-axis about the difference between lowest 'directly recorded', and other longer term estimates of the range of atmospheric carbon dioxide.
I think it is better to acknowledge those estimates and refer to the available evidence on how different the world was and what types of life and ecosystems seem to have been most common. Otherwise they can get "Well akshually it might be 'uncharted' but it's probably not 'unprecedented' " . . . . https://paleo-co2.org/co2pip
Based on these estimates it seems plausible that early primates experienced atmospheric carbon dioxide levels higher than today. The important part is that they'd not have lived very similar lives to modern humans, maybe like small lemurs or something.
As we watch the world burn.