this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2025
385 points (99.2% liked)

News

29966 readers
2851 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 4 points 56 minutes ago

Watson says that, looking back, he’s not confident that the damage long-term imprisonment did to his mind and body was worth it to remain in the country. “As lovely as America sounds, it’s not everything. It’s okay to start back over and live your life, because sometimes you’re gonna sit there for a long time if you’re fighting,” he says. His advice to other citizens in ICE detention is to remain open to giving up, if deportation means getting out of jail

Only do that if you know you'll actually be deported - rather than imprisoned offshore.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 9 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I fully agree with the comments criticizing the ICE and proof of citizenship. The shitty part, the judicial branch is not arresting nor penalizing the business owners hiring illegal labor and a lot of those fuckers voted for this shit.

[–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

Yeah, that's the problem isn't it? I have to assume that if there was nowhere to work, there'd be less folks coming here illegally. It's just known you can come, work your ass off, get paid pretty well in cash, and send that shit home on a weekly basis. And there's rules about what can get sent home and there are ways folks skirt that all the time. It's a whole economy. And nothing is done about the people facilitating it. It's arresting the drug user, but leaving the dealers in place.

[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 28 points 13 hours ago

Only people acting in good-faith care about your "proof"

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 141 points 1 day ago (13 children)

Not if the people examining my documents are morons, no.

I have a birth certificate, I have a passport and a passport card. None of that is a defense against "It's fake".

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/may/24/us-citizen-detained-ice-real-id

[–] LordCrom@lemmy.world 1 points 26 minutes ago

So ICE considers my government issued IDs are 'fake'....

Then we counter with saying that ICEs badges are fake and start shooting them in the fucking face if they ever try to take my wife away.

[–] CCMan1701A@startrek.website 5 points 13 hours ago

Time to get a global entry card as well.

[–] aramova@infosec.pub 65 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Another thing to consider is the recording of a ICE kidnapping where the person said they were a natural born citizen, when asked for proof they didn't have their birth certificate on them... While in the car.. driving to work.

The white paper birth certificate... That in my case is over 50 years old, and embossed with a stamp the clerks office likely got at the local trophy shop. That's it.

Drivers license including the Real ID ones don't count it seems.

So, yes. It's being used to indiscriminately arrest who they want like the Stasi fucks they are.

[–] dan1101@lemm.ee 2 points 1 hour ago

Let's see the citizenship proof of every ICE agent.

[–] RedAggroBest@lemmy.world 15 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Insane that the Real ID ones won't count when you need a brith certificate to get one.

[–] emeralddawn45@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

Do you not need a birth certificate to get a drivers license in the US?

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Usually you need multiple forms of identification, and the birth certificate could count as one, but isn't required because non-citizens can get a driver's license if they are here long enough. Someone spending the decade or so going through the slow ass process to get their citizenship needs a driver's license during that decade.

[–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Nor do you in most countries. Generally, a passport is the most authoritative form of identification.

[–] emeralddawn45@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Right but you need a birth certificate to get a US passport dont you?

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Yes, because a passport is based on citizenship.

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Not op, but most countries provide an ID that is not a passport. It needs a birth certificate. In my country that ID is far more authoritative than a passport and it even allows ingress to the country in case the passport is lost.

This ID issue is a very US thing. Most governments keep a tight registry of citizens and wouldn't have any doubt about who is and isn't a citizen.

[–] Sirdubdee@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I’d hope Ingress would be allowed in if their birth certificate said they were born there!

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Do you travel abroad with your birth certificate on you?

[–] LemmyFeed@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

You can use a birth certificate but it's not required, there's other methods to prove your identity.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 0 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

That's no longer true. That's what the RealID is about.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

While there is an option to have a driver's license as a Real ID, not all driver's licenses are Real IDs. Not sure the majority are tbh.

[–] silence7@lemmy.world 85 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] swordgeek@lemmy.ca 62 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Don't call it an arrest.

It's detainment. Kidnapping even. But an arrest has certain procedures and requirements that are not being followed by ICE.

[–] SinAdjetivos@lemmy.world 24 points 22 hours ago

So does detainment. The fact that they are not following the procedures and requirements makes it an unlawful arrest or, as you correctly pointed out, kidnapping.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 7 points 20 hours ago

Its your word and evidence against the word and ignorance and willingness to kick you out of a racist asshole.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 26 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

not if someone expects me to produce documents randomly on the sidewalk.

[–] reiterationstation@lemm.ee 13 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Without due process they can just take your documents and poof! What documents?

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 2 points 2 hours ago

This is pretty much it. When folks are disapearin and theyre response is they are bad and now its to late oh well. No one is safe. Its literally the secret police.

[–] silence7@lemmy.world 16 points 19 hours ago

Good luck once locked up without the right to an attorney

[–] SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works 46 points 22 hours ago

It's like proving to a Nazi, you don't have Jewish ancestry in 1938.

[–] SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works 30 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

It's getting to the point very soon that the only way you stop this, is armed community resistance.

No warrant, no entry. The only way you stop the abuse of power, is by confronting it with more power.

They are bullies, they are not brave.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 20 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

No, that's now. Look at what happened yesterday in L.A., for instance.

[–] dugmeup@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago

What happened?

[–] swordgeek@lemmy.ca 38 points 1 day ago

So many things wrong with this headline.

  • It is 'nearly impossible to escape' FOR ANYONE, not just US citizens. By design.
  • You can be in the US legitimately without being a citizen.
  • ANY AND EVERY detainment by ICE is wrongful.
  • You are not legally required to provide ID to authorities. In some states you can be compelled to provide your full name and possibly your address, ONLY if there is reasonable suspicion against you.
[–] dhork@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

There is an important and subtle distinction to be made here. A lot of noise is made calling people who are here without authorization "illegals", but that's not always true. Being present in the country without authorization is not automatically a criminal matter. It is true that many of the avenues for being here without authorization (crossing illegally, overstaying a visa) also violate the law, but that is handled as a separate matter.

Since immigration status is mostly a civil matter, ot a criminal one, these immigration courts are not under the Judicial Branch, like criminal courts are. They are actually "administrative courts" which are part of the Department of Justice, under the President, just like ICE is.

So while the courts occasionally provide a check on this Predident's power, the immigration courts never will. They ultimately report to the President through the DoJ, and the President has much more direct influence over it. So it doesn't surprise me that these people are stuck in a Kafkaesque hell, where ICE ignore their pleas that they are citizens and says "tell it to the judge", and when they finally get to the judge they get ignored.

Is it any wonder that Trump was so dead set against the immigration bill last year? He needed the process to stay chaotic, in order to have a better chance of winning.

[–] Vandals_handle@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

Republican leadership has been calling non-citizens here legally under temporary protected status illegals as well. Same holds true for other asylum seekers that followed the legal process. Facts and laws that stand in opposition to their goals are ignored by the republicans in charge and their supporters.

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

This does beg the question in my mind: If a person is wrongfully determined to be an illegal immigrant despite only having US citizenship, and is actually deported to some country ICE convinces themselves that person is from rather than "deporting" them to some prison in an unrelated country like El Salvador, they would presumably be in that other country illegally at that point. Would they be liable to be deported back to the US in such a case, by the government of that country?

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The other country has to be willing to receive them. In this case, the US would probably not.

But countries like El Salvador are being paid by the US to take these people, so they don't really care about the facts, they just want the money.

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In that case, do countries usually just take other countries at their word that anyone accused of being an illegal immigrant from that place is actually from where theyre accused of being from, or does the US have to, if it is trying to deport someone somewhere with a reasonably functional government, give that country some kind of evidence that theyre sending them one of their citizens before they agree to take them? For that matter, what happens if a country just stuffs someone on a plane going to another country without the consent of the country in question?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] don@lemm.ee 10 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

The number of blithely staunch fascists in that article’s comment section is nauseating.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›