this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2023
19 points (82.8% liked)

Technology

34977 readers
119 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] User_4272894@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

High fees, inconsistent/false advertising, burdensome chores? When was this article written, 2017? This has been the state of Airbnb for half its lifetime. There was a year, maybe two, at the very beginning where it truly was "crashing at your friend's place", in the same way Uber was "getting a ride from a friend". Both have become full time corporate institutions with wage slaves pushing a product that's somehow worse than the original problem (generally due to the lack of regulations around these "gig economy" alternatives), at the detriment of communities and others who attempted to make a living "playing by the rules".

At this point, if you're using Airbnb, not only are you impossibly ignorant of the problem, you're actively contributing to it.

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

"Lack of regulations" means ignoring existing regulations by insisting the new gig jobs aren't technically the same thing because "reasons."

Uber and Lyft were always taxis in everything except name.

[–] d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] sharedburdens@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] Sinnerman@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

What a bland article. Just when it starts to become insightful, it ends:

These events are all signs of a gig economy that might just be falling apart, not because of any one CEO decision but because companies that find success by framing themselves as a DIY alternative to an established industry can only grow in the same direction as the very thing they wanted to replace. The original sin, it seems, is when they try to be both.