this post was submitted on 31 May 2025
71 points (80.3% liked)

Asklemmy

48541 readers
1343 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm sorry but it doesn't make sense TO ME. Based on what I was taught, regardless of the month, I think what matters first is to know what day of the month you are in, if at the beginning, in the middle or at the end of said month. After you know that, you can find out the month to know where you are in the year.

What is the benefit of doing it the other way around?

EDIT: To avoid misunderstandings:

  • I am NOT making fun OF ANYONE.
  • I am NOT negatively judging ANYTHING.
  • I am totally open to being corrected and LEARN.
  • This post is out of pure and honest CURIOSITY.

So PLEASE, don't take it the wrong way.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mercano@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Most significant digits first. You write the thousands place before the hundreds, you write the month before the day. Of course, the whole argument is blow away when you write the year at the end instead of the beginning. (ISO YYYY-MM-DD dates for the win.)

[–] communism@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Most significant digits first.

That would only make sense if the US wrote the year first, but they don't. They just seem to slap the date together in a random order

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

I think that's context relevant though. If we think about when dates are most frequently used (news, business, planning) it's typically within the year (or month will give context).

That added with the fact it's not uncommon in some situations to just provide month/day.

That being said, I don't think either is better or worse. Just a preference kinda thing, unlike the issue between metric and imperial units.

[–] AnnaFrankfurter@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

little Endian entered the chat.

[–] Jentu@lemmy.ml 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Year is the most significant (read: big) unit in the list, but it is the least significant (pertinent to daily life) unless you're a time traveler. Of month and day, month is more significant than day in both size and pertinence, so it gets ordered first. But when sorting things into folders or file naming conventions, biggest category descending down to smaller categories is always the best.

You articulated what I was thinking, better than I could have. This is it for me.

I'd add that there's probably a lot of habit involved, plus the fact that everyone else does it.

So not only am I not used to saying "today is the 4th of May", everyone around me isn't used to hearing it either and might think I'm being weird.

[–] JargonWagon@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

American here. No idea. Either DD/MM/YYYY or YYYY/MM/DD are more logical, but here we are. When naming/renaming files and including a date in the name, I'll usually do YYYYMMDD format somewhere. If I'm emailing/texting others, I use MM/DD/YYYY.

Fun little story, the department I work in recently began to work with some people over in the UK, and even though I brought up the date format differences, we've already had someone of gett the month and day flipped and it caused some confusion on our end.

[–] That_Devil_Girl@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I write the date a bit different depending on which format its going on.

For example, computers like to sort things alphabetically. If I'm writing electronic diary entries, I'll name the document as "2025-06-01."

If I'm hand signing a legal document, I prefer to sign it as "01JUN2025" or "01JUN25" if space is an issue.

If the format is preselected and deviation isn't allowed, I'll just write it like everyone else does.

Personally, I like dating things in ascending or descending order. Day month year, or year month day.

[–] GooseFinger@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I'm a fan of the 01JUN2025 format. It's unambiguous and uses about the same space as other traditional formats.

[–] That_Devil_Girl@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago

It's how I was taught in the Navy to write dates. I stood a lot of watches and made a lot of log entries.

[–] NONE_dc@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Personally, I like dating things in ascending or descending order

Hey! Me too! 🀝

Ignoring the coding side of things...

It's relative. And also works easier to navigate the calendar. If we're planning something for next year I pull up next year's calendar. If it's this years and we're planning something for later this year, when I hear you say August, that's the month I go to. But if you say the 27th of August, The first thing I heard was the 27th which could possibly be this month or next month if it's say the 28th today.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

To make sure its not December right away. Fuck that entire month. Everyone hates December so much they throw the years biggest party at the end of it.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 days ago

The month tells you more about conditions like weather but that's kinda it.

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz -1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

regardless of the month, I think what matters first is to know what day of the month you are in

You're telling me that if you have a list of scheduled dates in the near future to meet with clients/patients/whatever, you first want them sorted by day, and then month?

So this list is the order you want to see these in?

  • 4/5/25
  • 8/7/25
  • 15/6/25
  • 16/5/25
  • 23/6/25

Doesn't it make way more sense to see them sorted by month first, then day, so that they're actually in chronological order.

  • 5/4/25
  • 5/16/25
  • 6/15/25
  • 6/23/25
  • 7/8/25

The only way you could defend the former listing is if you're also arguing that it makes sense to sort the list by the middle column, and hopefully we all agree that is just absurd. We don't alphabetize people by their middle names. You don't look up a word in the dictionary starting with the letter in the middle.

I jest, but I think this illustrates a real-life, commonplace example of when it makes sense. I agree that MM/DD/YYYY is not in order of magnitude, but I do believe it's in order of most significance to least significance given the timescales we are typically dealing with.

[–] barryamelton@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Such a waste. 2025-06-01. Easy. Chronological.

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 2 points 6 days ago

So,

  1. OP is asking why month before day rather than day before month
  2. In your example, it's not clear whether you are doing Y-M-D or Y-D-M, but I assume you are putting month before day, so we agree on that part. But
  3. I think we're all in favor of: Most significant on the left -> Least significant on the right. I'm just arguing that, most if the time, for the most common uses, Month is most significant. It's just more common that you're looking at a list of dates that all span the next few months than a list of dates that are all within this month, or beyond a year.
[–] korbel@lemmy.ml -4 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Out of curiosity: do you also find it weird that (I'm assuming) you use hour:minute order when reading the clock, instead of minute:hour? Would saying the minute first make more sense to you?

[–] Mycatiskai@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 days ago

This is already done often.

Quarter after 4 aka 4:15

10 to 5 aka 4:50.

Half past noon aka 12:30

[–] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 98 points 1 week ago (4 children)

As an American it was just what we were taught. However, when I started creating code and being pedantic about organizing files by date, I now prefer YYYYMMDD format as it is, chronologically speaking, superior when prefacing files with it. In this case, in my opinion, it's better to have the year and then month first prior to day.

To each their own, variety is the spice of life.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 31 points 1 week ago

This is the only format that truly makes sense, as it is both unambiguous and, as you noted, sortable.

[–] minibyte@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 week ago

ISO is my true north.

[–] NONE_dc@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (6 children)

What you say is interesting. Having a way of organizing time that suits your needs. That's why I asked if there was any benefit in the way Americans (and apparently also Chinese) represent time.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] IttihadChe@lemmy.ml 52 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Because the month is bigger and provides more context on it's own. You figure out the month first then place yourself within that scale.

Example:

"It's May (immediately tells us the context of 31days, spring, etc.) It is the 30th, so there's one day left in May"

Vs

"It's the 30th (provides no context except that it's not February). it's may, so there's one day left in May"

So both lead to the same conclusion, the first way just gives the limiting parameter/most context first.

Similar reasoning why the month is the primary separation on calendars.

Another example that follow this same principle, you tell time HH/mm to provide the larger context first, not mm/HH.

[–] red_concrete@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 days ago

you tell time HH/mm to provide the larger context first, not mm/HH.

Except not everywhere does, at least in speech. Half past ten. Quarter to eight. Five past three.

Although in the US I suppose you do say ten thirty, and seven forty-five? So at least you are consistent!

[–] dan1101@lemm.ee 1 points 6 days ago

This pretty much sums it up for me, knowing the month first conveys a lot of information. Then the specific day gives more precision, year you can often assume but it's there in case it's not what you expected.

Surprised I had to scroll all the way to the bottom of the comments to find this answer

[–] sylver_dragon@lemmy.world 41 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The short answer is, it's what we were taught in school. Like many preferences, it's shaped by the culture we grow up and live in.

I’m sorry but it doesn’t make sense to me.

Of course not, you were raised and live in a different culture; so, your preferences are different.

Ultimately, the right answer is ISO8601. It's unambiguous and sorts well on computers. But, I don't think any culture is teaching that as the primary way to write dates, so we're stuck with the crappy ways.

There is an American subculture teaching and using ISO 8601; the US military. They don’t call it that, but I learned later that’s what it is. They enforce YYYY-MM-DD on all documents.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] harsh3466@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Am American and I hate the MM/DD/YY(YY) format. Unfortunately its what's been taught and used as the standard date format for a long time.

I much prefer the ISO standard of YYYY-MM-DD. It's the superior format logically moving from the largest calendar unit to the smallest. Also superior for date ordering files.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] milkisklim@lemm.ee 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

It's two less syllables to say "April Fourth" than "The Fourth of April".

That's about the only advantage it has.

Edit:

I was thinking about this grammatically. English is an Adjective first language where the modifying adjective goes before the base noun.

In my example, April is the adjective. It tells the reader what kind of Fourth it is.

It's at least a kind of logic.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Montagge@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Because the day doesn't matter when you work every day between your three jobs that won't give you 40 hours in order to not give you health insurance.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (4 children)

ITT: defensive answers and ISO-8601 supporters.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Paradachshund@lemmy.today 17 points 1 week ago (8 children)

I can't say it matters to me that much what order it's in, but that's just the same order we say it in when fully written out. March 23, 2025. 03/23/2025.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] DirigibleProtein@aussie.zone 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Why do Americans use MM/DD/YY for date, but not mm:ss:hh for time? Doesn’t that make the same amount of sense?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] arthur@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Probably because in english it's the way they speak about dates (and the fact US kinda isolated themselves before WWII).

They started to write dates as they speak dates.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next β€Ί