this post was submitted on 30 May 2025
599 points (98.5% liked)

World News

47171 readers
2510 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

I thought everyone in France smoked, including the kids, no?

I gave mine nicotine patch from age 5.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

all the more reason. what's the point of banning something if no one's doing it

[–] Enoril@jlai.lu 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

In cliché world yeah.... But in reality, not so much. 😀

It been years... no... decades that smoking have nearly disappeared around me - including in the office.

I work with hundreds of people and the amount of people smoking can fit one hand. 25 years ago, i needed more than 2 hands to count them. And in my family, nobody starting at my parents generation and younger smokes.

Same story with wine during lunch. 25 years ago, it was several bottles each day at lunches.

Today, no more wine bottle and the trend started since easily 15 years now. Only for big occasion and the quantity have decreased a lot.

People drink more beers now. But far less than wine.

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago

I like these laws but also I want to smoke in some places. I'd love a return of places like cigar lounges and whisky bars

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 10 points 6 days ago

LOL like here in Montreal I see people smoking right next to the "No smoking within 3 meters" or whatever sign.

[–] ihatefascist@lemm.ee 9 points 6 days ago (3 children)

To protect children, meanwhile the soil is filled with cancer-inducing products pumped away illegally by big chemistry plants. In belgium and netherlands we can barely eat our own produce thanks to this. When are we gonna ban them??

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 6 days ago (3 children)

GOOD point. They shouldn't ban cigarettes until everything else bad is also banned.

They shouldn't ban cigarettes.

They should ban phillip morris and co who manifacture even more harmful tabacco to turn everybody into an addict.

[–] iglou@programming.dev 3 points 6 days ago

But they shouldn't ban anything else bad unless everything bad is banned. Fuck we can't ban shit

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

There's always one. Always fucking one.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

yeah also ban those... how does all that affect this exactly?

[–] HerrBeter@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

Ban children!?

[–] Zexks@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago (4 children)

I love how everyone supporting this just assumes you'll still be able to smoke at your own home when it doesn't saying anything of the sort. It explicitly states 'where children COULD be present'. This is literally everywhere short of some BDSM dungeon. This is basically going to make the population choose between smoking and having kids.

[–] Kiliyukuxima@lemmy.world 27 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Which actually sounds fair. Kids do not choose to be born and do not need to inhale smoke because parents are addicted to smoking

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 13 points 6 days ago

This is basically going to make the population choose between smoking and having kids.

Hell I'd start smoking again.

[–] Child_of_the_bukkake@lemmy.cafe 11 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (4 children)

Yeah don't smoke near your kids. It's not that hard.

They're also making the population choose between drinking and driving.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Zahtu@feddit.org 2 points 6 days ago

Well No, those laws usually only apply to Public areas, so as to Not Hurt your right of doing jackshit in your Home. At least the cannabis law in Germany has been designed Like it (but alas, cannabis is Not as much detrimental to the health of people around one as Smoking is).

[–] Aggravationstation@feddit.uk 4 points 6 days ago

Whether its actually enforced or not will be the question. I went to Disneyland Paris 7 years ago, there were signs everywhere saying smoke only in designated areas but there were people smoking all over and none of the staff seemed to care.

load more comments
view more: next ›