this post was submitted on 30 May 2025
599 points (98.5% liked)

World News

47127 readers
2841 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Susurrus@lemm.ee 42 points 6 days ago (2 children)

You could say smoking is one of the most human activities ever. Does nothing but actively harm and potentially kill everything around you. Just what we're the best at.

But seriously now. Can we speed up smoking bans? Like, everywhere?

Yeah prohibition is famous for working very well and not have any side effect.

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 12 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (4 children)

But seriously now. Can we speed up smoking bans? Like, everywhere?

Some European countries, including mine, has decided to raise the smoking age by 1 every year, essentially banning the next generation from smoking. Not really rapid or speeding up, but future is looking good

There was a slight problem where some people were allowed to smoke for portion of the year after birthday and before the age increase, for every year

[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 days ago (3 children)

That I can't get on board with personally. Everyone has a vice.

Imagine doing that with cannabis or drinking. Probably wouldn't get near the support even though those are also vices.

load more comments (3 replies)

Anything but prevent phillip morris from selling their shit huh?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

I thought everyone in France smoked, including the kids, no?

I gave mine nicotine patch from age 5.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago

I like these laws but also I want to smoke in some places. I'd love a return of places like cigar lounges and whisky bars

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 10 points 6 days ago

LOL like here in Montreal I see people smoking right next to the "No smoking within 3 meters" or whatever sign.

[–] PattyP@lemm.ee 15 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (5 children)

This comment section is a disaster, just as bad as reddit. Comments of no substance on the side of popular opinion get upvotes, and waves of downvotes come for anyone who disagrees even a little, and even if they do it in a reasonable way.

I’m mildly asthmatic so I don’t smoke, vape, etc. I have tried a few times and it is simply too much for my lungs to cope with. I still think banning people from smoking in public parks or on beaches is a bit much, and not doing the same with vaping seems like a strange double standard. I had a college roommate who both vaped and smoked, and the vaping bothered me more. I still put up with it.

Hopefully enforcement is reasonable - respectful smokers who deliberately try to keep their distance should be allowed to enjoy themselves, but I understand prosecuting(?) those who show no care and smoke right next to nonsmokers.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 5 days ago (3 children)

The issue with smoking is the second hand smoke. It causes cancer, among many other health issues. Vape on the other hand doesn’t really have this same concern.

They aren’t banning smoking because of nicotine, they are banning it because it causes cancer.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 6 days ago

Comments of no substance on the side of popular opinion get upvotes, and waves of downvotes come for anyone who disagrees even a little, and even if they do it in a reasonable way.

Lemmy seems much worse for this than reddit TBH.

There's a number of topics about which any dissent is met with vehement derision. As in those engaging in wrong think are assholes.

I don't really know of course but I suspect it's because lemmy has a narrower demographic than reddit. Opinions are just generally more homogeneous. I guess I'm describing an echo chamber.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ihatefascist@lemm.ee 9 points 6 days ago (3 children)

To protect children, meanwhile the soil is filled with cancer-inducing products pumped away illegally by big chemistry plants. In belgium and netherlands we can barely eat our own produce thanks to this. When are we gonna ban them??

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 6 days ago (3 children)

GOOD point. They shouldn't ban cigarettes until everything else bad is also banned.

They shouldn't ban cigarettes.

They should ban phillip morris and co who manifacture even more harmful tabacco to turn everybody into an addict.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pyre@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

yeah also ban those... how does all that affect this exactly?

[–] HerrBeter@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

Ban children!?

[–] Artyom@lemm.ee 13 points 6 days ago

Dang, France is really about to take away the one thing that the USA has always been ahead of them on.

[–] Bieren@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago

Banning children seems like it would be more effective.

[–] Zexks@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago (4 children)

I love how everyone supporting this just assumes you'll still be able to smoke at your own home when it doesn't saying anything of the sort. It explicitly states 'where children COULD be present'. This is literally everywhere short of some BDSM dungeon. This is basically going to make the population choose between smoking and having kids.

[–] Kiliyukuxima@lemmy.world 27 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Which actually sounds fair. Kids do not choose to be born and do not need to inhale smoke because parents are addicted to smoking

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 13 points 6 days ago

This is basically going to make the population choose between smoking and having kids.

Hell I'd start smoking again.

[–] Child_of_the_bukkake@lemmy.cafe 11 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (4 children)

Yeah don't smoke near your kids. It's not that hard.

They're also making the population choose between drinking and driving.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›