this post was submitted on 22 May 2025
497 points (97.9% liked)

Games

38748 readers
1641 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here and here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] heyWhatsay@slrpnk.net 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I boycott single player games that require online login/validation. Rockstar and Ubisoft are on my blacklist

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cheers_queers@lemm.ee 101 points 1 day ago

Im honestly so sick of online games that should be offline. I just got a few switch games to pass time on my breaks, and half of them require internet access. One of them is literally a bubble shooter.

[–] Fandangalo@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Out of the games I’ve been fortunate to work on, 1/7 require internet, and the 1 was my first industry job as QA. Everything else has been mobile, online required. 5/7 are no longer playable / removed from the internet.

It makes me sad because my kids will never play a bunch of things I made. I can’t revisit them nostalgically. If I had made something in the 90s, it would be preserved still.

I played the cards dealt to me to follow a dream and make a living, but I wish the industry wasn’t like this. The money has always been a role, but nowadays, it’s distorted so badly.

[–] Sunsofold@lemmings.world 2 points 17 hours ago

That's the difference shareholders make.

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 49 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Two more months to go and more than 50% left to reach 1 million signatures. It's sad to see that with how many people game, this petition has so little reach. I guess we'll have to wait till Fortnite is shut down, then suddenly many more will care that their childhood game is gone forever.

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 10 points 1 day ago

Unfortunately, I think it was just a lack of awareness that the petition in existed in certain countries where Ross just didn't have enough reach, possibly due to language barriers. A big push from native speakers of those countries with large audiences, like streamers, could've pushed it over the edge.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I don't know if I fully agree with the petition, but I do think that there are some real problems with the status quo.

I also think that either a legislature or courts need to provide legal criteria for the good or service division with games. I think that there probably need to be "good" games, "serviceʾ games, and possibly even games that have a component of both.

But I'm not in the EU or UK.

I also am kind of puzzled by this:

https://www.stopkillinggames.com/faq

Isn't the law on this already settled?

A: It mostly is within the United States, but not in many other countries.

It doesn't sound like it was as of 2020 in the US, at least on the good/service distinction:

https://www.carltonfields.com/insights/podcasts/lan-party-lawyers/youve-been-served-legal-effects-games-as-service

Of course, case law has never really been settled on whether games are goods or services. Right, Steve?

Steve Blickensderfer: No. No, I haven't been able to figure this out one way or the other looking at the cases.

A few quick searches haven't picked up US case law, if it's out there.

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

It doesn’t sound like it was as of 2020 in the US, at least on the good/service distinction:

The creator of the Stop Killing Games campaign did a segment about the viability of fighting it in the US in a segment here: https://youtu.be/DAD5iMe0Xj4?t=1097

tl:dr, the motivated lawyer he talked with on it eventually found a court case that set a precedent that would be extremely difficult to fight in such a pro-corporate court system without extreme amounts of legal funds. This is why the Stop Killing Games campaign is focusing on implementing laws in the EU and other non-US countries.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Gotta save up for some hard drives to download and keep my GOG games, plus some ~~pirated~~ totally legally acquired titles

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago

I call em full version demos. Specifically because I buy when it's good. The 2 hour steam thing sometimes, just isn't enough to really know. It usually is tho.

[–] SpaceDuck@feddit.org 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, trusting that anything Internet connected keeps working is a pipedream these days unfortunately.

Hardware and software.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 17 points 1 day ago

I don't even trust non-unlockable bootloaders. There's so much planned obsolescence everywhere

[–] rabber@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

that's why i dont buy digital games on nintendo. one day the service ends and it's gone forever.

[–] pdqcp@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm not buying Nintendo at all, so many shitty policies from that camp

[–] leave_it_blank@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

That's why I only buy games on GOG. After purchase I archive the installer, and it's mine forever. On console you are really fucked.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›