this post was submitted on 20 May 2025
1121 points (96.2% liked)

memes

14867 readers
5417 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JoYo@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 hour ago

At least we're not mixing in letters

Zulu Time: Am I a joke to you?

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 44 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

If the day started at 1:00 then by the second hour you would be at 2:00, even though only 1 hour has passed. Effectively the day starts at 0. In fact in 24-hour time that is how it's depicted, 00:00 with midday being depicted as 12:00, so it isn't confusing

[–] olafurp@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

In the roman empire the day/night cycle was divided into 24 segments. 12 for the day and 12 for the night which also meant a day hour in summer was longer than the night hour.

[–] demunted@lemmy.ml 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

As a programmer I'd rather it start at 0

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 11 hours ago

Yeah but now you can't enjoy the delights of python

[–] Danquebec@sh.itjust.works 2 points 14 hours ago

Which is also why I hate that our calendar starts at year 1.

[–] demunted@lemmy.ml 4 points 13 hours ago

Also see this: https://gist.github.com/timvisee/fcda9bbdff88d45cc9061606b4b923ca

It amazingly explains all the insanities for handling dates and times.

[–] teslasaur@lemmy.world 15 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (2 children)

It's the same logic that was used by ancient astronomers to arrive at 360 degrees for a full revolution.

The math is easier if you have to do it by hand.

[–] hakunawazo@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago

You've gone 360 on me.

[–] nialv7@lemmy.world 10 points 20 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Hobo@lemmy.world 7 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

It's also the one advantage Imperial has over metric. It's easier to do mental math in a lot of cases in base 12 rather than base 10.

Now excuse me while I bar my windows and doors from the mobs of angry people that show every time I point this out.

[–] teslasaur@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

True, but why does volume/length/weight have to be separated? I honestly wouldn't mind a base 12 system if they were connected logically.

[–] Hobo@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago

I should have been more precise, I was really just talking about length measurements and less so on the holy fuckshit of everything else. I, too, would be super on board with a base 12 measurement system...

If we invent it we can have 3 competing standards!

[–] ultracritical@lemmy.world 6 points 17 hours ago

Only really counts for feet and inches. But yes, having your base unit be divisible by halves, thirds, quarters, sixths, and twelths with whole numbers of sub units is highly useful when fabricating objects when you don't have access to modern tooling and supplies. In fact I would argue base 12 is the superior numerical system that was abandoned for metric and we have lost something in the meantime. Though Jan Misali might disagree with his love for sexinal.

Imperial units do have another advantage to this day, though. When talking about machining bolts and threads Imperial use threads per inch or threads per unit length while metric uses the pitch of the thread, so mm in-between threads. This decision means that when machining imperial nuts and bolts we by default pick whole numbers of threads per inch which due to the circular nature of lathes means that a simple clock dial can keep the lead screw synchronised with the head. Since metric uses pitch we pick numbers like 1.25mm pitch which does not always synchronous well with the lead screw and head and requires some odd gear ratios to cut specific threads.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 3 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Let me jump in until the mobs show up. "Noooooo, it's just what you're used to lalala. When is dividing by thirds ever useful, anyway?".

I've also found that if you make this point without any reference to metric vs imperial, people tend to accept it.

[–] Hobo@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

That's a good tip. I'll keep that in mind next time this topic comes up.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

6 means 30 is some toilet paper math

[–] ParadoxSeahorse@lemmy.world 8 points 23 hours ago

Well it’s because noon means nine because the day starts at six o’ clock, so three is noon, but we use it to mean twelve which is closer to midday, obviously

[–] ssfckdt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Somebody never had a clock with roman numerals and it shows

I remember getting into an argument with a grade school teacher over IIII because most such clocks put that for 4 instead of IV because of some fuckin reason

[–] Opisek@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I despise these so so much. IIII was historically NEVER correct. Some doofus decided to put that on a clock because it looks more symmetrical with the VIII on the other side. Terrible reasoning.

[–] some_random_nick@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

"However, even though it is now widely accepted that 4 must be written IV, the original and most ancient pattern for Roman numerals wasn’t the same as what we know today. Earliest models did, in fact, use VIIII for 9 (instead of IX) and IIII for 4 (instead of IV). However, these two numerals proved problematic, they were easily confused with III and VIII. Instead of the original additive notation, the Roman numeral system changed to the more familiar subtractive notation. However, this was well after the fall of the Roman Empire."

https://monochrome-watches.com/why-do-clocks-and-watches-use-roman-numeral-iiii-instead-of-iv/

[–] mhague@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

IIII was the way Romans usually wrote 4. It's associated with simplicity / illiteracy. But also depended on era, region, intended audience, or practicality. I think the most famous example is the coliseum using LIIII.

There's still variation even now; standardization is relatively new, and it's not common knowledge. And dates... it's like every 50-100 years people decided to write them differently.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] PieMePlenty@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Hour hand -> hour = n
Minute hand -> minute = n * 5
It makes sense, there's just an algorithm attached to each pointer.

Hour -> 3 = 3
Minute -> 3 = 3 * 5 = 15

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago

The first clocks didn't have a minute hand though.

[–] Corn@lemmy.ml 59 points 1 day ago (14 children)
[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 46 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] bluewing@lemm.ee 4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Even the French figured out that decimalized time was stupid after a couple of years.

Which has added credence to the old saying that "The French follow no one. And no one follows the French."

[–] josefo@leminal.space 1 points 14 hours ago

I kinda want to try it out lol

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] LanguageIsCool@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

The 6 means 30, both of which also mean 1/2

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 80 points 1 day ago (1 children)

IIRC they counted the bones in their fingers using their thumb and that gives 12. The first sundial was around the equator and there is always light for half a day, so half a day becomes 12 hours.

To count large numbers often one hand was used to count using 5 fingers and the other to count the bones, so you get 5x12 for 60 minutes.

[–] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 48 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (10 children)

AIUI there was an aspect in the divisibility of the numbers being convenient.

12 is divisible by 2, 3, 4, and 6. 60 is divisible by 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 12, 15, 20, and 30.

10 is divisible by 2 and 5. 100 is divisible by 2, 4, 5, 10, 20, 25, and 50.

If you want to minimize dealing with fractions, 12 and 60 are far more convenient than 10 and 100.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Relatively funny but gets worse the more you think about it.

The 6 stands for 6, not 30.

When we have AM and PM it would be dumb to have 1-24.

1 is the end of the 1st hour. 2 the end of the second. This is why it starts at 0.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JordanZ@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Somebody gave me this clock…I just need the time.

[–] pseudo@jlai.lu 2 points 10 hours ago

I have no issue reading this.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›