Firefox

5039 readers

71 users here now

A community for discussion about Mozilla Firefox.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

lightbeam24@lemmy.world

Pocket for Firefox doesn't seem to make sense for me. (feddit.org)

submitted 3 hours ago by Wrdlbrmpfd@feddit.org to c/firefox@lemmy.world

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Many articles nowadays are behind a paywall. So when I want to add an article from a paid newspaper to Pocket, I figured out that that portal just tries to grab the article itself instead of taking it from Firefox directly. Which means that you just see the part of the article you see when you aren't logged in.

Does that make any sense? Not really.

top 6 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Character_Locked@lemm.ee 16 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (2 children)

Weird gimmick that I've literally never used or even ever considered using. There's already this obscure thing that you can save articles and pages in for later called "bookmarks".

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 2 points 22 minutes ago

Bookmarks are problematic.

The page can go away, or be changed.

[–] Wrdlbrmpfd@feddit.org 7 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Bookmarks don't do the job, because you can't read the article anymore

when it was removed or the URL changed
when you cancel the subsription of the newspaper

[–] Character_Locked@lemm.ee 6 points 2 hours ago

That's a fair point. So I guess the purpose that it actually serves is bookmarking and saving the page at the same time. I can definitely see the use in that actually.

[–] Geodad@lemm.ee 13 points 3 hours ago

I don't use pocket. It just seems like a solution to a problem that doesn't exist.

[–] shadowedcross@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 hours ago

Before I started using Zen, the first thing I'd do every time I installed Firefox is disable Pocket.