32
New German chancellor Merz calls on EU to scrap supply chain law | dpa international
(dpa-international.com)
CDU is doing CDU things. Inhumane politics as usual.
this post was submitted on 09 May 2025
32 points (100.0% liked)
Europe
5832 readers
901 users here now
News and information from Europe 🇪🇺
(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)
Rules (2024-08-30)
- This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
- No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
- Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
- No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
- Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
- If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
- Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
- Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
- No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
- Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.
(This list may get expanded as necessary.)
Posts that link to the following sources will be removed
- on any topic: RT, news-pravda:com, GB News, Fox, Breitbart, Daily Caller, OAN, sociable:co, citjourno:com, brusselssignal:eu, europesays:com, geo-trends:eu, any AI slop sites (when in doubt please look for a credible imprint/about page), change:org (for privacy reasons)
- on Middle-East topics: Al Jazeera
- on Hungary: Euronews
Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media. Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com
(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)
Ban lengths, etc.
We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.
If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.
If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to any of the mods: @federalreverse@feddit.org, @poVoq@slrpnk.net, or @anzo@programming.dev.
founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
I remember a linked article that explored how the supply chain laws could turn into a long-term advantage for Europe.
Yes, it has a cost. But if we want to care about human beings and the environment, we have to regulate, and have that cost of supply chain requirements, just like we do have these within Europe for European companies.
If we do not have that, we decide to accept exploitation. If we abolish the regulation, we decide to support exploitation, because at large, that is the inevitable consequence, because it's cheaper.
Companies, the economy, can adjust just fine, as long as it's a stable environment. Dropping the regulation would not only have a human and environmental cost, but economic costs, and even more so if it were to be reapplied later. Even saying that it could be dropped is damaging to long-term market stability.
Historically the EU could set many quality standards that would later be adapted in other markets too. This gave European companies an edge.
But even without other markets. If the EU wants to compete on price rather than quality inside the EU market the only option is to massively lower the wages and standard of living and erase all the purchasing power advantage that was built over the past century. The next step will be to revert to child labor and forced labor as even a cheap EU cannot compete with forcing people to work for free.
By enforcing supply chain transparency European companies are protected from outside competitors who aren't subject to the same labor standards inside their countries and in their supply chain.
Finally by abolishing the supply chain transparency Germany is helping Russia circumvent sanctions both in import and export and the coalition agreement of the new government already says that they don't want to surveil the rules but rather trust companies and just do random probes every now and then. This will be a massive boost to Russia and cement the defeat of Ukraine. Merz talks about how he wants to help Ukraine have been empty posturing during opposition times.
We really do have a Trump-light as our Chancellor now in Germany. He's only been in office for a few days and he's already flooding the zone with outrages at a faster rate than it's possible to process them. At least his office doesn't hold nearly as much power as the office of POTUS, and he needs the votes of the SPD to decide basically anything
He‘s not only embarrassingly incompetent as a leader, his party also fails to do the single thing boomers voted them for: Being conservative. They can’t stick to a plan. They‘re unreliable and inconsistent. It‘s a horror show for industry and potential investors because there‘s no way of telling if decisions from today are withdrawn tomorrow afternoon.
The Merkel years were wasted for sure but at least you could plan ahead when the government simply didin‘t get things done.
thats what conservatives do, cancel every single little effort made towards a better world
Some companies however see the directive as adding excessive requirements that would impose bureaucratic burdens and reduce Europe's competitiveness.
Everyone else is being mean to their workers, so we want too! /s
The supply chain stuff isn't really about their workers. It's about ensuring fair conditions of workers in the supply chain.
Which is a bureaucratic burden. It does have a cost for no immediate economic benefit.
But if you consider human rights and morality, it's a necessary addition. Despite the cost.
Just a matter of time until "We gassed ... things ... in the past, we want to do this again!" is legitimate again. The only thing I wonder about is: Already under Merz or only under Höckler?
The so-called Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) is part of von der Leyen's long-term push for more sustainable and climate-friendly regulations.
The law, this was adopted last year and is to be applied from 2028, aims to strengthen human rights worldwide. Large companies are to be held accountable for human rights violations in their supply chains including child or forced labour.