this post was submitted on 08 May 2025

165 points (98.2% liked)

News

29268 readers

3615 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

rjc@lemmy.world

Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world

Tenthrow@lemmy.world

JonsJava@lemmy.world

gedaliyah@lemmy.world

little_cow@lemmy.world

jeffw@lemmy.world

enu@lemmy.world

WrenFeathers@lemmy.world

165

Judge at Sean 'Diddy' Combs trial scolds lawyer for calling prosecutors 'six pack of white women' (apnews.com)

submitted 1 day ago by HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works to c/news@lemmy.world

23 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A transcript of a robing room meeting on Tuesday contained the conversation between Judge Arun Subramanian and attorney Mark Geragos.

Later in the day, the judge asked in the robing room meeting if Geragos — whose high-profile clients have included Michael Jackson and the Menendez brothers — was advising Combs “in any way, shape or form?”

Geragos responded that he represents the entertainer’s mother in a matter and has represented Combs and “I do talk with him with great -- with great frequency.” The lawyer’s daughter, Teny Geragos, is a key member of Combs’ legal team.

Then, the judge noted that Geragos had said on a recent “2 Angry Men” podcast he hosts with TMZ founder Mark Levin that the prosecution team was made up of six white women and he had referred to them as a “six-pack of white women.”

all 24 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[+] ToastedRavioli@midwest.social -8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (10 children)

Subramanian then asked Geragos if he knew that was not something that anyone should say “as an officer of the court and a member of the bar.”

Geragos responded: “I think when you’ve got a black man who’s being prosecuted and the client feels like he’s being targeted, it’s a — it’s an observation.”

The judge repeated his point, saying: “I think this is ridiculous. I think referring to the prosecution in this case as a six-pack of white women is outrageous.”

Honestly I think I have a bigger issue with the judge not accepting that as a valid criticism than I do with the lawyer actually saying “six-pack of white women”.

Its 2025, I dont think we need to be pretending that the courtroom is somehow above racial politics. It never has been and it probably never will be, especially the direction things are headed in now.

Im not trying to defend Diddy, and Im sure he likely did a lot of the bad shit hes accused of doing, but that being said: if our legal system has been predicated on race being a point of argument surrounding people’s behavior for the last several hundred years, I think we could give some leeway for a lawyer pointing out the racial politics of having 6 white female prosecutors outside the fucking courtroom

[–] CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee 2 points 17 hours ago

I think there are plenty of examples of racial prejudice within the judicial system but I have a real hard time believing that an extremely wealthy celebrity is going to face this prejudice in the same way some common person would.

[–] SloppyPuppy@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

I bet your response was different if this was the opposite and the white defendant’s lawyer would say something about a six pack of black women prosecutors.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 46 points 1 day ago

I genuinely don't understand how the race or gender of the prosecution has any bearing here. We're not talking about a jury, we're talking about the people who are presenting state's evidence in the trial. The prosecution does not decide whether Diddy is innocent or guilty, a jury does. If a jury in the trial of a black man is composed of 12 white women, that could be a real point of issue in our justice system, but the prosecution? It makes no sense

[–] SpicyLizards@reddthat.com 12 points 1 day ago

Don't defend diddy

[–] LongMember69@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Im not trying to defend Diddy, but…

Buddy, he stands accused of sexually assaulting over 100 people including drugging and gang-raping children. You don’t need to play devil’s advocate for the defense here.

[–] ech@lemm.ee 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

They're not. They're pointing out problems with the legal system as it stands. The two aren't mutually exclusive.

Honestly, it's sad that my first thought was, "Oh? They're all women? That's progress!".

[–] LongMember69@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They are.

They’re pretending that Diddy’s defense team’s unsubstantiated innuendo of racial bias is a valid point worth entertaining. It’s not.

It’s a desperate attempt at deflecting that trivializes the real issues in the legal system that you note.

[+] ToastedRavioli@midwest.social -15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Literally the judge said “this is not a statement an officer of the court or bar member should be making”. That isnt saying that there are valid times to say it. That is him saying the lawyer said something that should never be said by a lawyer.

You really ought to reconsider, but Im done trying to convince you of anything. You dont seem to want to accept that this has nothing to do with Diddy, other than his case is the reason we are talking about this issue right now.

This judge could have said the same to any lawyer in any case. Would it have been appropriate then? If it wasnt Diddy’s case?

[–] LongMember69@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

That is him saying the lawyer said something that should never be said by a lawyer.

Yes. Implying the prosecution is racially motivated with no evidence to support it, doing so by calling them a “six pack of white women” is indeed inappropriate. Add onto that the particulars at play here? I’m with the judge, pretty outrageous.

This judge could have said the same to any lawyer in any case.

Yeah, but they didn’t.

Would it have been appropriate then? If it wasnt Diddy’s case?

Depends on the case.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I’d say calling them a “six pack of white women” would never be acceptable in a profession setting (ie a lawyer commenting on a trial his daughter is working for the defense on.)

There’s better ways to phrase it that is far from being so disparaging.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If figured with what Trump is doing that people would realize that it's always worth defending things like "due process" and the rights to a good legal defence. Especially when the defendant is unlikeable since that's when such rights are often eroded.

[–] CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee 2 points 17 hours ago

Diddy is doing exactly what Trump did in his court cases and that's discrediting the process with unfounded allegations.

[–] LongMember69@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

False equivalency.

People in Diddy’s camp are making a naked ploy to baselessly undermine the credibility of the prosecution - presumably because Diddy is cooked - and we’ve got some folks here lapping it up.

[+] ToastedRavioli@midwest.social -14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

He stands accused, not convicted, which may not matter to you but it should
Me defending the lawyer’s ability to make comments on the racial politics of the situation really has nothing to do with Diddy in any way, other than that Diddy is a black man and high profile enough for the lawyer to have been talking about the case on a podcast
“Playing the devil’s advocate” doesnt mean whatever you think it means based on how you just used it

To me, this whole thing has nothing to do with Diddy so much as it is about a judge who is uncomfortable with the fact that there are valid criticisms to be had surrounding race and the courts.

Playing the devils advocate would be saying something like “Can Diddy get a fair trial if the prosecution is 6 white women?”. I think he can, but I also think those prosecutors and especially the judge should be cognizant of how the racial politics could impact the trial. To ensure that he gets a fair trial and is rightfully convicted if guilty (as we all anticipate he is)

[–] LongMember69@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

He stands accused, not convicted, which may not matter to you but it should

Correct. By over 100 people, many of whom were minors when they were allegedly sexually abused.

Me defending the lawyer’s ability to make comments on the racial politics of the situation really has nothing to do with Diddy in any way,

I agree with your argument in the abstract, but given the nature of the case I don’t think I’d be choosing to carry water here.

a judge who is uncomfortable with the fact that there are valid criticisms to be had surrounding race and the courts.

Or, have you considered it could be that the judge is familiar with the circumstances of the case, and in this instance finds the defense’s argument unsubstantiated, gross, and totally inappropriate?

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

There may very well be an issue of racism. That’s for comb’s actual defense team to bring to the judges attention.

Further, there absolutely is a better way to express that concern. It was an absolutely sexist comment and highly inappropriate. as a lawyer Geragos should know better.

Especially as he is loosely connected to the defense team and could potentially taint the jury pool.

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

To me, this whole thing has nothing to do with Diddy so much as it is about a judge who is uncomfortable with the fact that there are valid criticisms to be had surrounding race and the courts.

Here's the thing tho, that lawyer isn't even part of the defense team. He's simply a spectator in the courtroom who happens to be a lawyer and that's what the judge is holding him accountable for, ie: he should know the rules and keep his mouth shut.

[–] SloppyPuppy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

What are you saying? They shouldve found six black prosecutors? What if thats the only thing they have? Why do the prosecutors need to be judged / appreciated solely by their skin color?

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think we could give some leeway for a lawyer pointing out the racial politics of having 6 white female prosecutors outside the fucking courtroom

If he had said something about 6 white male prosecutors would you have still said the same thing? Probably not.

[–] ToastedRavioli@midwest.social 4 points 1 day ago

It would be the same situation, so yea? I dont understand your point. Their gender is irrelevant

[–] thedruid@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

I have a problem with both that racist comment and the judge not understanding what it was supposed to mean.

Prosecuted. Stop being a racist ass and speak respectfully. Especially about those not actually accused of anything.

Judge., understand that culture and race are important in these proceedings and act accordingly

[–] toy_boat_toy_boat@lemmy.world -4 points 1 day ago

that was a hard upvote to give tbh. i disgree, but you make a good argument.

that said, my disagreement comes from the perspective of a non-american who isn't knee-deep in the racial weeds that still thrive down there. it sounds like there's a lot more nuance involved.