this post was submitted on 04 May 2025
374 points (73.7% liked)

Selfhosted

46639 readers
1543 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 1 points 49 minutes ago

It sounded cool a couple of years ago, but it was first installed in 2021 and I'm yet to hear of it really going anywhere.

[–] Phegan@lemmy.world 92 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

Why is this on the self hosting community

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 1 points 45 minutes ago

Self hosting a tree

[–] CluckN@lemmy.world 18 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

The water is hosting algae

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Looks like one of them fish tank PC cases that are apparently a thing.

[–] eskimofry@lemm.ee 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

self hosting is anti-capitalist, so is being against urban brutalism.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] xor@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 6 hours ago

homeless people find sitting in the shade of trees to be comfortable, and the city whole point of urban design is to make them uncomfortable and to suffer

[–] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 11 points 6 hours ago

I think it’s probably cheaper in the long run to self host a tree instead, unless you live in an apartment with absolutely no green space. But I’d rather get a VPF and host a tree there if I had too

[–] Guenther_Amanita@slrpnk.net 6 points 6 hours ago

Does this count too?

I already posted this on !balconygardening@slrpnk.net. .

I'm purposefully growing duckweed on my balcony.
I'm doing !hydroponics@slrpnk.net, and by doing that, I have lots of waste water with still good fertilizer in it.

Duckweed is one of the fastest growing, nutrient densest and least demanding plant out there, and you can just scoop it out with a strainer.

It's exponentially growing and if you don't wanna eat it, it makes great organic fertiliser or animal feed with lots of protein and micronutients!

[–] danielquinn@lemmy.ca 65 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

I had the same reaction until I read this.

TL;DR: it's 10-50x more efficient at cleaning the air and actually generates both electricity and fertiliser.

Yes, it would be better to just get rid of all the cars generating the pollution in the first place and putting in some more trees, but there are clear advantages to this.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 13 points 11 hours ago

I appreciate Rebecca Watson's opinion. Watched the 6min video, now convinced 👍

Also learned a new term: kneejerk cynicism

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] 0ops@lemm.ee 3 points 6 hours ago

It's not an either/or thing, the tank in the picture is literally sitting under a tree

[–] Capricorn_Geriatric@lemmy.world 26 points 11 hours ago (5 children)

Short answer: the bank won't give your shiny new tree-planting business a loan as easily as it will to a "liquid tank tree replacement" one.

Long answer:

  • Trees take time to grow
  • Trees need to be planted
  • Trees make shade
  • Animals like birds and insects like bees and mosquitos like to live next to them
  • Trees don't need electricity
  • Trees take in heat radiated from the pavement
  • Trees don't look cool

While algae are more efficient at turning CO2 into oxygen in theory, in practice algae don't have a good climate in such a tank (no oxygen without ventilation, i.e. constant electricity and they get cooked through the glass).

All in all, more of a gimmick than anything.

[–] exedore6@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 6 hours ago

Roots limit where they can grow without messing up infrastructure.

[–] urandom@lemmy.world 32 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Trees don’t look cool

You take that back!

[–] eskimofry@lemm.ee 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

was about to furiously reply with the same retort... but yeah. I LOVE green spaces

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)
  • Trees take time to grow

Sure, of course not removing literally all of them in the first place is preferable but hindsight is 20/20 I guess. And good things come to those who wait.

  • Trees need to be planted

True, planting a tree seems a bit easier than installing a weird tank though, despite time to grow.

  • Trees make shade

Good.

  • Animals like birds and insects like bees and mosquitos like to live next to them

Good.

  • Trees don't need electricity

Good.

  • Trees take in heat radiated from the pavement

Good.

  • Trees don't look cool

Bullshit.

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 8 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Aren't like half of those bullet points positives? Also in addition to what you said once you got a tree you got a tree, those tanks need constant maintenence and cycling which I doubt anyone is going to bother with for more than a year after installing them.

[–] Rakonat@lemmy.world 13 points 10 hours ago

The comment you replying to was trying to not so subtly point out this is a business plot and little else. Nobody is going to pay a subscription fee to have a tree in front of their business, but they might cough up money for a third party to maintain a tank of algae out front if it was sold right

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ChuckTheMonkey@fedia.io 229 points 16 hours ago (8 children)

Why is this in self hosted?

[–] goldteeth@lemmy.dbzer0.com 121 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

in case you want to self-host your own algae, I guess

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 12 points 11 hours ago

It has a USB port.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Allero@lemmy.today 42 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
  1. Wrong community, maybe? Lol

  2. iirc, algae are better oxygen producers per units of mass and volume, so a tank full of algae might actually be better than a tree. One issue though is that trees can grow on open ground, while algae require a tank to be built, most likely negating the economic benefits. Also, trees are more aesthetically pleasing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 90 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I like how everyone is acting like it is normal to have this in self hosted

load more comments (1 replies)

Not liquid enough.

[–] Elkot@lemmy.world 11 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

How's my dog supposed to piss on that

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 11 points 11 hours ago

I don't think your dog will see that as problematic.

load more comments
view more: next ›