You should at least keep up enough to make informed choices when you vote.
this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2024
21 points (95.7% liked)
[Outdated, please look at pinned post] Casual Conversation
6609 readers
1 users here now
Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.
RULES
- Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling
- Encourage conversation in your post
- Avoid controversial topics such as politics or societal debates
- Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate
- No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc.
- Respect privacy: Don’t ask for or share any personal information
Related discussion-focused communities
- !actual_discussion@lemmy.ca
- !askmenover30@lemm.ee
- !dads@feddit.uk
- !letstalkaboutgames@feddit.uk
- !movies@lemm.ee
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Yup, unfortunately that only happens every 4-5 years...
There are other elections throughout the year... Midterms at the federal level, and often state and local elections too.
Admittedly how it works in the US, but I'm sure still applies in other countries, maybe not everywhere.
I used to live in a country where they would just bunch them all together: local, country, EU all in one day. Kind of sad, because it gives the impression that your vote only counts once in a few year, as I said in my previous comment. No midterms.
The middle ground is to put a defined limit on news consumption, like 5 minutes per day. That's enough to stay aware of major events but not so much that you'd necessarily get wrapped up in excessive worrying about irrelevant items. NPR, the BBC, and probably others, offer 5-minute audio news briefs updated hourly. These are available to stream on demand like a podcast. I wouldn't recommend listening hourly but the point is they're up to date at any single time in the day, which you might choose as your daily news blast. Then just tune out, literally and figuratively.
CBC as well, for the 5 minute hourly podcast. Listening to that once a day is honestly more than enough for me.
I avoid it as a rule. Anything important I will hear about and can research further.
Try ground news.
How does this help with changing my news consumption to being healthier?
Edit: Change of words.
It helps by letting you know what you’re reading is bias or not.
Indeed, very good site!
Kind of reflects my approach to news nowadays.
I try to keep in touch with the local news, my neighborhood, my town, my province, my country, my continent. Anything beyond that I follow from far away.
100% true words
Also try Double Down News
Because we like click bait headlines and over dramatization?
But seriously, I'd never heard of it and just checked it out, and I can't get past the ridiculous headlines while claiming to be unbiased.
The titles are extreme because the topics they discuss and are trying to point out are extreme.
These journalists and writers are criticized for pointing out outrageous, extreme and unbelievable events in the world that are actually occurring.
Yet they would also be criticized for NOT pointing out outrageous, extreme and unbelievable events in the world that are actually occurring.
Double Down News is an actual counter point to the current establishment and they are not afraid of pointing out difficult truths to actually inform people to the dangers of the world rather than in ignoring, playing down or white washing current events in the world.