this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2025
64 points (98.5% liked)

Green Energy

2701 readers
116 users here now

Everything about energy production and storage.

Related communities:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 11 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

This is only slightly less stupid than "float-ovoltaics" or "solar freakin' roadways!!!"

[–] Oneser@lemm.ee 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Space is at a premium in many parts of Switzerland and a lot of the available land is privately owned. This MIGHT be the easiest way to deploy solar in the specific rail sections being considered and may only generate a small portion of the needed electricity.

So it might be the simplest effective idea for the region.

[–] raltoid@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

One of the big positives is that the "mounting frame" is already there and pretty consistent, you don't need to clear land and build things. So they just drive a custom train over that basically clip in removable panels.

[–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 7 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

It's probably not the best idea but it's considerably less stupid than those, seeing as they managed to actually build one

[–] Mihies@programming.dev 4 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah, we'll see. There are so many possible issues with this, starting with why. We still have plenty of roofs to cover which are easy, predictable and yield better output for much lower price. Then there are issues with vibrations, efficiency and pollution at least.

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Converting roofs into solar is simple and cool if you don't know anything about any of that. Then so many problems emerging, you start going crazy and yearn for the simplicity and straightforwardness of a floating solar platform.
And that's before you remember that not all of the world is US and most people don't actually live in a detached house with a roof.

[–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 hours ago

Don't get me wrong I still think it's dumb

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 8 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

I wonder if they could just add a caboose to every train that would clean off the panels as it travels over them.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Especially since train toilets traditionally empty on the tracks... Although they probably no longer do these days.

(also I had to look "caboose" up)

[–] Stache_@lemmy.ml 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah thats what I was thinking too

[–] Stache_@lemmy.ml 7 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Oh, well here we go:

“The panels are equipped with anti-reflective coatings to prevent glare, and cleaning systems, such as cylindrical brushes mounted on trains, help maintain efficiency by removing dust and debris.”

Lovely

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 8 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

What is the upside of building panels into the rail instead of next to it?

[–] Stache_@lemmy.ml 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe a bit more protection from the elements? And maybe they’ll design a system to push and clear debris as the train goes over

[–] Willy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

yeah, the cleaning is one thing they mention they have. alone with others

[–] Stache_@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 hours ago

Haha yeah I read the comments before I read the article. Rookie move lol

[–] Willy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 hours ago

the article covers that.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 4 points 15 hours ago

So it can be installed by the train.