this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2025
51 points (98.1% liked)

Green Energy

2701 readers
97 users here now

Everything about energy production and storage.

Related communities:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 7 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I wonder if they could just add a caboose to every train that would clean off the panels as it travels over them.

[–] Stache_@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah thats what I was thinking too

[–] Stache_@lemmy.ml 6 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Oh, well here we go:

“The panels are equipped with anti-reflective coatings to prevent glare, and cleaning systems, such as cylindrical brushes mounted on trains, help maintain efficiency by removing dust and debris.”

Lovely

[–] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 9 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

This is only slightly less stupid than "float-ovoltaics" or "solar freakin' roadways!!!"

[–] Oneser@lemm.ee 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Space is at a premium in many parts of Switzerland and a lot of the available land is privately owned. This MIGHT be the easiest way to deploy solar in the specific rail sections being considered and may only generate a small portion of the needed electricity.

So it might be the simplest effective idea for the region.

[–] raltoid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

One of the big positives is that the "mounting frame" is already there and pretty consistent, you don't need to clear land and build things. So they just drive a custom train over that basically clip in removable panels.

[–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

It's probably not the best idea but it's considerably less stupid than those, seeing as they managed to actually build one

[–] Mihies@programming.dev 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, we'll see. There are so many possible issues with this, starting with why. We still have plenty of roofs to cover which are easy, predictable and yield better output for much lower price. Then there are issues with vibrations, efficiency and pollution at least.

[–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 hours ago

Don't get me wrong I still think it's dumb

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 8 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

What is the upside of building panels into the rail instead of next to it?

[–] Willy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago

the article covers that.

[–] Stache_@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe a bit more protection from the elements? And maybe they’ll design a system to push and clear debris as the train goes over

[–] Willy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

yeah, the cleaning is one thing they mention they have. alone with others

[–] Stache_@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 hours ago

Haha yeah I read the comments before I read the article. Rookie move lol

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 4 points 9 hours ago

So it can be installed by the train.