A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy π
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
One of the ways to avoid a copyright strike is if you copy other people's work, then what you upload must be "transformative" i.e. you have alter that source content significantly. Satire / Parody are two ways to do that.
But the cheapest, laziest way to "transform" content is to do reaction videos to it. And some people don't even do that. They'll just sit there, eating their dinner . . . occasionally glancing at the screen and going, "huh." Lazy jerks.
Some people like wwf wrestling, some people like fake reaction videos.
It's absolutely awful and if I get clickbaited into one such videos I let it play for a few seconds before clicking it away. I hope this makes their bounce rate drop.
They steal content and provide nothing of value besides their fragile and fake personalities that a few people might like because they're lonely.
If you're referring to the youtube thumbnail trend, it's because it helps people choose videos without reading channel names. You know who it's from just by looking, you see the title, you're more likely to click.
In other words, the office nerds at Mr. Beast Inc. crunched the numbers and discovered that they get ??% more viewers by putting Jimmy's face in the thumbnail, and every other youtuber took that as gospel.
I think he means how more and more YouTubers have face can on while they play. It seems to have picked up steam over the last few years. I find it annoying as hell. Sometimes it's a cut-down Livestream, which I don't know why anyone does face cam there either, though I hate watching unedited content, it's boring AF.
Face cams on let's play videos have been a thing for years. Even more so with livestreams. It's rare for a live streamer to not have video when playing a game, and its detrimental to their growth and viewership to not have a face cam or vtuber.
I personally like no commentary let's plays with no face cam. I'm here to check out a game I'm interested in, not to suck some influencers dick or join a community that is way to big to effectively communicate in.
Honestly I think thereβs a strong difference between people reacting to content who are adding value (eg adding meaning information, elaborating on their opinion, etc) and people who βreact to contentβ just to get away with reposting the content. The second group tends to try to obscure as little of the original video as they can get away with and if you subscribe to them you effectively get a pre-curated list of somewhat interesting videos (if you can ignore their heads or a silly automated voiceover).
Sadly both groups often donβt credit the original creators, so whoever actually made the original content tends to be out of luck regarding getting their fair share of revenue or digital traffic.
In order to use someone elses content under fair use you have to make "meaningful commentary" so they do the bare minimum in order to use other people's videos.
Fair use commentary generally requires as little of the actual original work to be used as possible. Summary may be ok, clips/recordings are ok, but they must be minimal. That commentary must also be substantive.
Reproducing a work in full (thus obviously limiting the commercial viability of the original work - another factor considered) with light commentary over the top probably wouldn't hold up in court. The commentary just avoids automatic systems in the increasingly poorly moderated internet.
The technicality is, it's not a replay of somebodies content with changes, it's "Hey look at me reacting to another's content"
This is the correct answer here! People copyright strike reposted videos all the time, but turning it into commentary makes it a new artwork so it wonβt get removed. They also often insert the commentary over the sections of video that include copyrighted music.
I had very recently come across a reactionary content left-wing YouTube channel, reacting to Rachel Maddow of MSNBC reacting to Elon Musk's interview... I thought that was pretty bizarre. (link).
It was a 30 second intro segment, then a 8 minute clip of the Maddow show, followed by a 1 minute outro commentary segment.
I actively avoid videos with those awful thumbnails, but I figure it must result in a net gain in clicks.
I will sometimes watch them on YouTube as itβs a compilation of a certain kind of goofy video. Otherwise Iβm getting random clips from all kinds of genres.
That's one of the reasons I stopped using YouTube. I don't want to see people's stupid face, it adds nothing and it detracts from the video.
easy way to steal content, and enough people don't care it's happening, so they get away with it
Narcissism
You should make one of those video with your reaction to the fake reaction videos
"Look at this old lady. She wake up everyday to do old lady things. Like if you think that the old lady is doing great"
It's been a trend for quite a while now, "reaction" videos. There was even a YouTube gremlin who wholesale stole content from everyone and did nothing on camera
Sniperwolf?
It boosts engagement. Anything you see trending is because it boosts engagement. Social media pays for engagement, content creators min max for that.
Are there people who specifically watch these videos for the reactions? I can imagine some enjoying it, but I thought the general consensus (at least among my friends) is that itβs annoying. I was hoping the trend would die out at some point, but the opposite seems to be happening.
Reaction videos have been for many years always very profitable. I mean, you can easily find creators/channels that have millions of views and they just film themselves reacting to a video. As a creator, you can incorporate a bit of that into your content and you'll likely see people engaging more. I personally never understood what's the appeal of watching somebody watch something instead of me watching that directly. I think it is something that goes in the direction of a para-social relationship, but I'm no expert.
Edit: I think I might be thinking about a different kind of reaction videos mind. Sharing an example of what you were referring to?
It is gross, but watch a child watch the video. They look to the talking head to interpret what is happening and to tell them how to react.
Sounds like boomers watching cable news to me.
DarkviperAU has entered the chat.
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLAnJ4ZuTYaeGv4WIexP9C5LAuMEnMkG-Q
I dislike reaction content.
I like all the extra information. What I'd really like is for the subtitles to be in sync with the audio. Comedy is spoiled when the whole build up AND punch-line show up together 15 seconds early.
I'm not sure what you mean... I haven't really gotten much of that at all, thankfully, as it does sound pretty annoying.
I think he means reaction content. Where some influencer or some other reacts to viral stuff or whatever. Most are shit.
But if you managed to find it there are some good ones where they add good content on top.
I personally am following a chef doing this reaction content. He adds a lot of advice and suggestions for the normal home cooks.
I thought reaction videos were passΓ©. Is this a short video thing I'm too old to get targeted by?
Since Google wants to take the TikTok crowd, they are boosting Shorts. So content creators are pushing Shorts.
Not sure why that people do it, and yes it is annoying.
As in most social media apps, downvote and move on. Personally, I have a list of channels I subscribe to and mostly just stick to watching the content they produce. None of that is reaction videos, which I agree are lazy and stupid, but I guess some people like them or they wouldn't keep making the rounds.
I like reaction videos. If you don't like them, don't watch them, this isn't complicated. I think football is stupid, but lots of people love it. It's a big ol world, and it's full of people with nervous systems all firing in different ways. Stop yucking other people's yums.
Some of us are homebound with various disabilities. Some of us are too ill or too medicated to deal with actual social interaction. Reactions offer a parasocial experience that helps stave off loneliness. Lots of things that seem "stupid" turn out to be helpful for disabled people.
What is added by having a small face in the corner of the screen that partially blocks the actual content of the video? Like with straws itβs to help people with grip strength or with unsteady hands to be able to drink water so what do you actually gain from the persons face? I am not trying to be attacking but just trying to understand
You may have missed the point of this post. It's not about enjoying reaction videos. There are lots of creators putting effort into their videos. OP is focused on grifters intentionally forcing a strong reaction to boost engagement on their videos. its annoying that bad videos get pushed by some unknown algorithm.
What if someone's yum is yuking on someone else's yum?
ah yes, Karl Popper's paradox of yumyucking.
Let me guess, this dude with yellow helmet showing the same expression at both fails and wins of various construction and transport jobs? The content is often good but he's ruining it.
I know the one you're talking about and to me that's the least egregious of them all. It's contextual and thematic, even if it is just shit.
I've been looking over my daughters shoulder as she watches YouTube shorts, and a regular clip of brain rot will announc its using the greenscreen effect. Hidden behind all the username/soundtrack/description will be a teeny tiny brown man's head muttering punjab almost imperceptibly quietly.
Not sure if they're better or worse than the dickheads splitting the screen in two and passively pointing up towards the video that is also showing.