this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2025
82 points (95.6% liked)

Asklemmy

47698 readers
671 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I used to occasionally enjoy watching random videos online. But this trend of people attaching their annoying and obviously FAKE reactions on top of the video is happening a lot lately. Aren't people bothered by this ? How is that even supposed to help with the content of the video ? I understand if they own the content of the video, but lately I see a lot of people doing it on completely random content.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 47 points 1 day ago (4 children)

In order to use someone elses content under fair use you have to make "meaningful commentary" so they do the bare minimum in order to use other people's videos.

[–] EmilyIsTrans@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fair use commentary generally requires as little of the actual original work to be used as possible. Summary may be ok, clips/recordings are ok, but they must be minimal. That commentary must also be substantive.

Reproducing a work in full (thus obviously limiting the commercial viability of the original work - another factor considered) with light commentary over the top probably wouldn't hold up in court. The commentary just avoids automatic systems in the increasingly poorly moderated internet.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 1 points 18 hours ago

The technicality is, it's not a replay of somebodies content with changes, it's "Hey look at me reacting to another's content"

This is the correct answer here! People copyright strike reposted videos all the time, but turning it into commentary makes it a new artwork so it won’t get removed. They also often insert the commentary over the sections of video that include copyrighted music.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

I had very recently come across a reactionary content left-wing YouTube channel, reacting to Rachel Maddow of MSNBC reacting to Elon Musk's interview... I thought that was pretty bizarre. (link).

It was a 30 second intro segment, then a 8 minute clip of the Maddow show, followed by a 1 minute outro commentary segment.