this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2025
32 points (97.1% liked)

PC Gaming

10861 readers
1070 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] proper@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

“keeping its promise” that’s not exactly how i remember it

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

No, no. Let's pat them on the back for drawing a line in the samd—all by their own initiative—and sticking to it. We all know how hard it is to develop a game with offline mode these days. I salute them for sticking to their promise.

I'm glad they're testing too. It must be so hard to figure out how to overcome IP checks to launch a game and have it run. True heroes of the industry. No doubt we'll see indie games follow with offline options too.

[–] Parptarf@lemm.ee 10 points 1 day ago

Like I’m gonna trust anything Ubisoft says anymore.

[–] DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

And the first game that was already stolen?

[–] windowsphoneguy@feddit.org 7 points 1 day ago

Which had the much better map, too