this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2025
310 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

69298 readers
4877 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 71 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Fun fact: the shapes of the letters in a font can’t be copyrighted, but the file that defines a font can. The name could be trademarked, though, so even if you redrew a font you might have to give it a different name. If it’s not trademarked, though, that’s how you end up with several companies having their own version of the same font.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Is that the same for all countries though or are you talking about a specific place where that‘s the case? I don‘t know much about the subject but this reads like one of those US specific fun facts that the rest of us can‘t really make use of.

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 days ago

In the thread it looks like in the US you can't copyright the shapes, but in the UK, you can for 25 years. Also the .ttf file that contains the code to make the font render correctly at low DPI is copyrightable in the US.

[–] Maestro@fedia.io 30 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Another fun fact: the music for that ad was also stolen

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 days ago

Different ad

[–] tal@lemmy.today 33 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

8h ago
@Rib this may be apocryphal, but I remember hearing the backing track for it was also used without paying the creator royalties Nischay@thatloststudent@infosec.exchange

2h ago
@bootblackcub@woof.group @Rib
It's not apocryphal, it actually happened: https://torrentfreak.com/rights-group-fined-for-not-paying-artist-for-anti-piracy-ad-120717/

That's kind of impressive, actually.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 20 points 2 days ago
[–] Pirata@lemm.ee 10 points 2 days ago

Always the same gadlighters trick: acuse others of doing what you are doing.

[–] SnortsGarlicPowder@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 days ago

Going to find out the original script was used illegally in 2 years.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Typical.

Especially when that ad was released, nobody considered piracy a crime seriously then.

Those making the ad could probably be thinking like: something business-made, with workhours put into it, shouldn't be pirated, that's theft, but something made by enthusiasts can, it's taking what doesn't have an owner, just toys in the Internet, and also GPL is dishonest for having rules, it's cheating and poison, it's ownerless too, only companies doing business should be able to sue for IP violations.

[–] apex32@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I've never seen a .gay website before.

Check out the registry: https://ohhey.gay/

[–] DemBoSain@midwest.social 2 points 1 day ago

I've stolen so many fonts...

[–] PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago

Font name GitHub. Bam.

[–] JunglGeorg@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Wow... 🤯😂😂😂