this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2024
134 points (90.9% liked)

Games

16549 readers
1061 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jecht360@lemmy.world 74 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Hopefully Nintendo/The Pokemon Company will see how well Palworld is doing and stop putting out disappointing mainline Pokemon games.

[–] Mirodir@discuss.tchncs.de 51 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Scarlet and Violet sold 10 million copies during the launch weekend, so I think they'll be pretty content to keep churning out mediocre games at a much faster pace.

[–] FalseDiamond@sh.itjust.works 33 points 9 months ago

Yeah but this is a literal nobody coming into the market and pulling almost half the sales numbers as the single biggest franchise in the world with near 30 years' worth of brand recognition. That's still got to be somewhat of a wakeup call.

[–] jecht360@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yeah it makes me sad to think about that - people are going to keep buying the games regardless of how bad they get.

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Every Pokémon is someone's first. I bet about up to half of each iterations sales are completely new customers. And then another big chunk being a group where it's their second or third.

[–] wccrawford@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

Plus, it's far from my "second or third" and I still enjoy them. Pokemon games are what they are, and I like them.

I'm not saying they couldn't be improved, but I don't pass on a game just because it doesn't max out its potential. I buy fun games, and no game is perfect.

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 30 points 9 months ago

Palworld is basically what I wanted Pokemon Legends: Arceus to be (minus the guns, obviously). The game has issues, which I mostly chalk up to early access woes, but it's a great case study in how to do an open world creature collector game.

[–] nyakojiru@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 9 months ago (3 children)

The power of hype is borderless

[–] NegativeLookBehind@kbin.social 22 points 9 months ago (2 children)

When it’s just hype alone, games end up getting destroyed with bad reviews. If a game is hyped up and is actually good, that’s different, isn’t it?

[–] Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 9 months ago

People are loving the concept, but I've heard the game itself is pretty meh

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago

If a game lives up to the hype, it's not hype. It's recognition.

[–] Secret300@sh.itjust.works 9 points 9 months ago (2 children)

All my friends and I never heard of this game until it came to early access. We weren't hyped at all more surprised. Plus I want to play it before Nintendo tries to sue. I know they have no right to but it's Nintendo, they'll probably try

[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 18 points 9 months ago

Careful of accusing Nintendo of being litigious, they might sue you for damaging their rep.

[–] nyakojiru@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] Secret300@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago

Nah I thought hype was like being excited for something to be. As far as I know most people weren't excited for it before it released

[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 9 months ago

Hopefully they don’t pull a TemTem

[–] WeLoveCastingSpellz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I hope this will help the devolopment of the game so that this doesn't stay in early access forever like their previous game

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I hope they don't just pack their pencils and leave after this.

[–] WeLoveCastingSpellz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I think we are safe on that front at least, there is way too much effort put into the game for it to be a cash grab and run

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 9 months ago

Wouldn't be the first. I mean, they already have millions in profit. I don't know how big their team is, but at 7$M development cost they are looking at 100M+ profit.

With a quick search, seems like estimates are that the team size is currently around 40 people. This makes it sound like a more committed effort than if it was a small team.

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

From what I’ve read, it’s ARK but not terrible. Watched the first 20 minutes and it was more reminiscent of BOTW. When’s it swap to ARK?

[–] nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago

That is has some base building elements, it's a bunch of popular elements from other games put into a open world pokemon botw mold.