this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2025
531 points (99.3% liked)

News

28981 readers
4368 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Experts say Pentagon chief has endangered secrets of US defense department and given assistance to foreign spies

As more develops about the US defense secretary, Pete Hegseth, and his repeated disclosures of sensitive military intelligence in unsecured Signal group chats, there are growing concerns his behavior has weakened the Pentagon in the eyes of its foreign adversaries and made him and his entourage a top espionage target.

Allies, already concerned by Donald Trump’s aggressive tariffs, have also begun to see the US as an intelligence-sharing liability. There are fears that the mounting firings and leak inquiries in Hegseth’s orbit, along with his inability to manage these internal crises, exposes the entire global US war footing – especially, if a geopolitical and external crisis comes across his desk.

“[What if] a foreign entity, whether it be a state actor or non-state actor, is able to intercept the movements of troops or department personnel, or something like that, capture them and hold them to ransom,” said Kristofer Goldsmith, an Iraq war veteran and CEO at Task Force Butler. “That kind of thing could very easily happen.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ptz@dubvee.org 153 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Not just Hesgeth.

The whole administration is comprised of conspiracy nuts and other big brains who will click on any crazy link they come across.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 71 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The Director of National Intelligence is a probable Russian asset. Also the President.

[–] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 38 points 3 days ago

And let's not forget Elon and his Doge bro minions. They're destroying the security around every system they touch, firing the people responsible for that security, moving sensitive data out through starlink to God knows where, and apparently just giving logins to Russia.

Almost makes storing nuclear secrets in a bathroom seem quaint and wholesome by comparison.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

This, and Elmo too

[–] AshMan85@lemmy.world 77 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Espionage? They are giving it away lol

[–] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 27 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Come on down to Crazy Pete's intel emporium! We're practically giving this intel away!

[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Crazy Pete's 😂

[–] hansolo@lemm.ee 13 points 3 days ago

Seriously, these people are publicly making mistakes that my grandma would make. If there's a best practice for safety and security, they actively don't do it.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 45 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Don't worry, the Russians are still busy processing what they downloaded after fElon left the downloads open in DOGE-infested agencies.

[–] xor@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

almost as if f-elon did that deliberately

[–] painfulasterisk1@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] gedhrel@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

He had a number of unchaperoned calls with Putin. I think it's more likely that he's acting in fear of an unpleasant death; sometimes direct credible threats work wonders.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 1 points 21 hours ago

Or he, like so many bullies, secretly likes to have someone dominate him, and he loves Putin for it.

[–] painfulasterisk1@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago

That's extremely possible. Now I have to look if Musk dares to get close to a window.

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Oh I've seen this one! This is where the crowd starts chanting "LOCK HER UP, LOCK HER UP" right?

[–] InputZero@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

But what about her emails? /S

[–] BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world 37 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Well, only if Trump hasn't already Xeroxed the classified papers already, himself, to sell for personal profit.

[–] GiuseppeAndTheYeti@midwest.social 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Unrelated, it's crazy to me that Xerox has remained in the lexicon for so long.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 days ago

it's a REALLY fun word.

[–] peteyestee@feddit.org 23 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

America's government is already dead. This is darkly comical. America is dead. I don't say that with pride but it is true. It is not what is was, and I'm not sure it ever was what they said it was.

[–] wanderingmagus@lemm.ee 5 points 2 days ago

Never was, just this time the mask fell off.

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 21 points 2 days ago

Of course he is.

But also, foreign agents can literally just walk into the pisser at Mara-lago and find classified documents.

This administration has no interest in maintaining state secrets.

[–] Tronn4@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

The amount of unqualified idiots being handed out security passes like halloween candy is unfathomable

[–] BrokenGlepnir@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Signal leak Pete is a pretty good nickname

[–] myrmidex@slrpnk.net 22 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Curiousfur@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Whiskeyleaks

I don’t think it is a fear. It is a fact

[–] wjrii@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Earlier in the week, news broke that Hegseth had personally created a Signal group chat including his wife, brother and about a dozen other people who he then texted highly sensitive information on active strikes in Yemen.... One person said Russian and Chinese spies were no doubt directly targeting susceptible people in Hegseth’s inner circle.

Even if, as I am sure he very wrongly does, Hegseth believes himself morally beyond reproach and too smart to be tricked, does he honestly think every single person in his circle and in their circles is as well? JFC.

[–] b161@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 days ago

I’m sure everyone in his circle are all using highly secure mobile devices not linked to their personal identities, on the latest software updates and would never be duped by a phishing link or be the target of a zero click exploit by a state actor.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 9 points 2 days ago

Oh hey ya think? Is this kind of deductive reasoning what a masters degree at an ivy league school gets you? Man I wish I could be smart enough to figure that out.

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Why bother? I'm sure for the right price it's for sale. Might require a trip to the Mar-a-Lago bathroom though.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago

after the complimentary lunch of room-temperature big macs and fries, that won't be a problem.

[–] Stamau123@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

is 'espionage' a new whisky distillery? Then he is def a big target.

[–] DougHolland@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

That headline is a masterwork of obfuscation, softening an obvious fact by hiding it behind "fears grow".

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Obviously. Is there any point in history when the SecDef wasn't one of the juiciest espionage targets in the world, regardless of who is filling the role at the time?

[–] frickineh@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago

Yeah but how many times could spies bribe the person in that role with a 6 pack? You could let him pick what he wants from the gas station beer case and he'd probably give you all his passwords.

[–] sylver_dragon@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Ya, the headline is kinda bullshit. The SecDef is always going to be a top espionage target. The real problem is that, had anyone else who holds a security clearance been this slipshod with classified material, they would be in jail now. The two tiered nature for accountability for security violations demonstrates deep problems with the entire system.

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The guy is a moron. He's clearly demonstrated that he has no concept of information security on multiple occasions. For more than a year, it has been known the Signal has a weakness that Russia and others have been exploiting.

It's really pretty simple. The hackers send a phishing email or text to the target with a specially crafted QR code. If the user is dumb enough to scan the code, and we all know Hegseth is dumb enough, then the hacker's device will from then on be linked with the target users device and get a copy of every message sent or received. There is no way in hell that Russia, China, and anyone else who wants to isn't already getting all his Signal messages.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 24 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (8 children)

That's not a Signal weakness. That's profound user idiocy. It's very clear what the "link a device" feature is for, and obviously linking someone else's device would be very dumb.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 days ago

if only there was a government agency, perhaps one tasked with national security even.. that could provide the secure devices and software needed for high-ranking government workers and others working with sensitive information.. and those workers actually used that gear and followed their training and policies.

[–] Vent@lemm.ee 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The other glaring weakness is that if you invite Putin to your group chat, Russia gets access to all of your messages!! /s (though, I guess it's a real threat with this administration)

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

psst . . . starlink.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] ArtVandelay@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's not an exploit, that is a known and published and advertised feature of signal. That's like when Grandma says her Facebook was hacked because she gave her username and password to MichaelSoft tech support. This is the level of profound fucking stupid that our Republican government has.

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

I never said it was an exploit. I said it was a weakness that was being exploited.

[–] mhague@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Experts eating at roach infested e coli laboratory masquerading as a restaurant have this to say: I saw Pete handle food without gloves. It doesn't inspire confidence in the establishment.

[–] Subtracty@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Even if they do get rid of him, won't he be a vulnerability for years to come? Because of the position he was given, certainly not earned, he is privy to not only the details of current military strikes but also secret goals for future military projects. Right? I assume most people who have these jobs have a modicum of self-respect and patriotic duty. But couldn't he just leak that important info to anyone even after he is fired?

load more comments
view more: next ›