this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
32 points (94.4% liked)

Malicious Compliance

21350 readers
44 users here now

People conforming to the letter, but not the spirit, of a request. For now, this includes text posts, images, videos and links. Please ensure that the “malicious compliance” aspect is apparent - if you’re making a text post, be sure to explain this part; if it’s an image/video/link, use the “Body” field to elaborate.

======

======

Also check out the following communities:

!fakehistoryporn@lemmy.world !unethicallifeprotips@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dystop@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

hah, this one is funny!

Also, echoing @Imotali@lemmy.world's comment below (unfortunately you can't sticky comments on lemmy): comments that express hate towards any group are a violation of instance guidelines. BE NICE.

[–] Imotali@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago (24 children)

Mod here. Just want to openly and unequivocally state... I will remove your comment if you're transphobic. I will refer to trans people to let me know if you are being transphobic. I will ban you if you make an egregiously off colour comment. and I will take pleasure in doing this. Fuck your transphobic bullshit, go somewhere else. Nobody wants you here.

[–] SuddenDownpour@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Cis guy here. Based mod.

[–] wanderingmagus@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Thanks for everything you do to keep this community safe. I know it can't be easy.

[–] Imotali@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

idk, I just got to yeet like at least a handful of transphobes into oblivion so.... was pretty fun.

[–] BewilderedBeast@mander.xyz 4 points 2 years ago

It's important to find work that also nourishes your soul.

[–] DharmaCurious@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

God bless it I fucking love lemmy! 😄

[–] Che_Donkey@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

Fucking A right. n

You are amazing, brave people and deserve a place in society where you are loved . M

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Thank you so much!

[–] Ascend910@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago
[–] macintosh@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Uhhh???? Based??????????

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Thank you for not being reddit.

[–] DCLXVI@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

What a hero

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] vis4valentine@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

This happens when transphobes forgets that trans men exists lol.

[–] Goldmage263@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago

I'd love to ~~watch~~ forcefeed them a plate of their, "you will always be a woman" words.

[–] Skellybones@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

They exist? Thought they were a fairytale

[–] david@feddit.uk 1 points 2 years ago

I know three.

In fact, come to think of it, I only know two trans women, so I know more trans men than trans women.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] stanleytweedle@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I mean... it's supposed to be a 'beauty contest' so why shouldn't they compete?

Not that I don't think the entire concept of a competition over beauty is stupid, but they exist, so why not just see who wins?

[–] Neve8028@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago

It's funny because the original trans sports bans were justified by saying that they would have an unfair advantage. This beauty pageant ban is just transphobes saying that trans women are unfairly attractive lmfao.

[–] krayj@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I think it would have been fair to have a rule saying "no surgical modifications"... because doing things like facelift, nose-job, breast/buttox implants, cheek lifts, wrinkle removal, etc, are obviously unfair advantages (in a beauty contest) for those who have the money pay for it; and having a generic blanket rule like that would have accomplished the same thing they were trying to accomplish without being so blatantly transphobic... so a rule like what they have only proves that they are both despicable AND dumb. The entire notion of beauty pageants is outdated and stupid if you ask me.

[–] Lenins2ndCat@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think it would have been fair to have a rule saying “no surgical modifications”…

How are you intending to prove that that? Only the bad surgery makes itself obvious.

[–] krayj@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Like any kind of contest, finding rules violations is hard and not foolproof. It's like sports that forbid using steroids - competitors do regularly take those substances while training, then quit taking them for competition and go uncaught. Competitors who are discovered later to have been violating rules are stripped of titles.

That said, I don't think it's a very controversial concept that a beauty pageant shouldn't be a contest about who could afford the best surgeons. Well - as I said earlier I think beauty pageants are absurd to begin with, but if they have to exist I don't think it should be a contest between surgeons.

[–] Lenins2ndCat@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They are absurd and it'll probably be a good thing when we've got past their existence. But the problem here is that proving surgery is essentially impossible. It's quite unlike drugs that you can test for. Maybe implants you could test for but that's just one thing, and I'm not sure that beauty pageants even have the kind of budget required for advanced tests.

[–] Syrc@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

One of the contest’s rules says you can’t participate if you willingly had a nude photo took in your lifetime. Good luck proving that (not even considering how it’s a honeypot for revenge porn to surface)

[–] Deuces@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Though I would watch one that was a contest between surgeons. I imagine it'd start pretty tame, but the first time a girl with cat ears wins, were only like 5 years from the really crazy shit

[–] Reliant1087@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

This would be hilarious if it happened.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

On the one hand, that might work. On the other hand, who gives a fuck about the rules in a contest with arbitrary standards?

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

Lol, you implement that and basically all beauty pageants stop existing. Which would be a good thing, mind you. But I've never met a pageant contestant in my life that isn't … let's say … heavily enhanced by medical procedures.

[–] luthis@lemmy.nz 1 points 2 years ago

This is deliciously rich. They really painted themselves into a corner with that one!

[–] FReddit@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I'd be more interested in protesting the fact that it's now legal to grope women in Italy.

The landmark decision involved a school janitor who jammed his hand into a 17 year old girl's panties.

Pick the hill you want to die on.

[–] heterophobe@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

"Why do this one good thing when you should be doing another good thing instead?"

[–] Lazylazycat@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I'm sure they care about both of those things.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 years ago

This is a pretty awesome way to protest and show solidarity. These trans men are ballsy as fuck and I salute them.

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

He is like: "I used the transphobia to destroy the transphobia"

[–] planish@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

Has anyone ever seen a "woman from birth"? Like a whole-ass adult woman popping out of somebody not appreciably larger than her? Ready for a beauty pageant at zero minutes old?

Completely independent of gender, people should know that "women" are adults and have zero overlap with "children" or especially "newborn infants".

Or is this a bad translation from the Italian?

[–] eggvng@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Elia Bonci, who also spoke to la Repubblica, said: “I took courage, used my deadname and signed up for Miss Italy because fighting transphobia is intersectional and even though I’m not a trans woman, I’ve decided to fight for their rights.”

much respect to all that followed!

[–] pythonoob@programming.dev 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm confused. If they are using a dead name how are they not trans?

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They are trans men, who the organizers consider women as opposed to the trans women who can't compete because they consider them men.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm gonna need a pen and paper for this one.

[–] peipei1@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I'll summarize:

  • The contest organizers don't accept trans women (AKA assigned male at birth, transitioned to female)

  • This means that they are being transphobic, they aren't treating trans women as women.

  • The person in the article is the opposite, assigned female at birth and transitioned to male. AKA a trans man.

  • This person is considered a woman by the beauty contest despite identifying as male.

  • He entered the beauty contest as a form of protest and to bring attention to the blatant transphobia.

load more comments
view more: next ›