this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2025
279 points (96.0% liked)

Technology

69211 readers
3753 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dumbass@leminal.space 36 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

You know how we thought " How could chrome get any worse?" well, we have an answer.

[–] rippersnapper@lemm.ee 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I’ve said this before and will say it again. The only tech companies that should be allowed to buy Chrome are Canonical and its equivalents.

[–] simsalabim@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

Isn't Canonical up to some crummy schemes, too?

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 7 points 7 hours ago

And if you thought there was some natural end point to enshittification, here's your evidence that there's no such thing.

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 25 points 9 hours ago (4 children)

Are these fucks stupid? Chromium is open sourced. They can do it themselves

[–] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 31 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

They don't want to buy the browser. They want to buy the brand and the users. Chrome makes up over half the browser market. Think of all the data they could extract from Chrome users. It would cost significantly more to fork chromium and grow the user base to a point where they could extract anything valuable from them, and that's assuming they'd be successful enough to make it happen.

[–] MITM0@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago
[–] Saleh@feddit.org 10 points 9 hours ago

No, MS just wants to expand their monopoly, but "MS buying most common browser, after antitrust laws already forbid internet explorer" doesnt ring so well.

[–] RickC137@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] TON618@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago

I like to think if people want whatever it is OpenAI thinks browsers need AI for, the userbase will manifest itself.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 11 points 8 hours ago

WTF? Just download it for free.

[–] msage@programming.dev 11 points 8 hours ago

Isn't Google going to do it themselves?

[–] neclimdul@lemmy.world 28 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Great! Now not only can chrome eat all my system memory, it can use all my GPU memory at the same time! It's genius!

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

Likely it'll use the cloud for processing, you'll just get really hard-to-opt-out AI features, like "prompt by default" and "AI autocomplete", which you can only "snooze" as they'll automatically be turned back on the moment there's a "great new feature", like putting a filter on by default on image generators to fool the eye that it's made by real artists.

[–] uawarebrah@sh.itjust.works 13 points 15 hours ago

This can't happen. Not because I think google is doing a wonderful job, but it's got serious market share now. Basically a monopoly. It needs to leave the hands of for profit companies and be transitioned to a foundation.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

don't they already have brave for that?

[–] madis@lemm.ee 5 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] madis@lemm.ee 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

And is OpenAI somehow related to crypto?

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 4 hours ago

crypto and ai are two sides of the same garbage

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 138 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Why connect to the Internet with it then. The browser could just make everything up on the fly.

Got questions about a medication?

Maybe you want to check up on some disease symptoms?

AI can make something that sounds vaguely plausible.

[–] vane@lemmy.world 7 points 15 hours ago

Why use head if you can use ChatGPT. Remove head and start working smarter.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 70 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why connect to the Internet with it then

To check if your subscription to their models is still valid of course

[–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

And send back telemetry and training data.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 8 points 16 hours ago

AKA all of your personal data, you know, just in case we need it

[–] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 day ago

Browsing the internet will be like playing AI Quake II, you'll think you are in this alternate universe.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 108 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Sounds like the best thing that could happen to Firefox

[–] grue@lemmy.world 48 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Mozilla spinning off control of its development to an independent group the way they did with Thunderbird would be the best thing that could happen to Firefox.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozilla_Thunderbird :

Operated by MZLA Technologies Corporation, a subsidiary of the Mozilla Foundation, Thunderbird is an independent, community-driven project that is managed and overseen by the Thunderbird Council, which is elected by the Thunderbird community.

Chrome self-destructing because of stupidity like AI would only ever manage to be a close second, at best.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 55 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

Unfortunately, Mozilla is investing a ton of money into AI, too.

[–] vivendi@programming.dev 10 points 16 hours ago

Mozilla works mainly on LOCAL AI not this corporate trash like closedAI

[–] Bazimon@lemm.ee 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Look into Waterfox instead.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 1 points 4 hours ago

That really doesn't solve the problem, like every other Firefox fork they're completely dependent on Firefox. You can't just make a new webbrowser just like that, and while third party developers can certainly disable some anti-features, there are limits to that and they can definitely not do the basic work that the Firefox devs do (or could do, if Mozilla had different priorities).

[–] exu@feditown.com 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Some of their I initiatives are good, like the built-in local translation tool we now have.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 15 points 19 hours ago

Also their initiative to recognise images and generate alt-text for screen-reader users.

My sister is blind and screen readers are close to useless on the web, so it was great to hear Mozilla is working on that.

[–] doodledup@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (5 children)

A desperate attempt of revenue diversification.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Mozilla will loose Google's deal money.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts 61 points 1 day ago

OpenAI is like a zombie stumbling around trying to infect everything. We shove it away because it’s fuckin’ gross and we want nothing to do with it, while the bosses that reanimated it are like “well fuck, we made this thing, we have to use it for something.”

[–] FrameXX@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 20 hours ago

Chrome or Chromium project?

[–] blinx615@lemmy.ml 27 points 1 day ago

Chromium is open source? What a concept...

[–] 11111one11111@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago (2 children)

How the fuck would this be more cost effective than them making their own chrome based browser and not be a demonstration of their over inflated operating costs and company valuation?

If you are paying for a service that is charging you enough to allow them to buy the most widly used browser from a company whose business model is to monopolize data, then maybe you're paying them a titbit more than what the service they're providing is worth.

[–] MysticKetchup@lemmy.world 62 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm sure they're less interested about buying Chrome than they are about buying Chrome's market share

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zier@fedia.io 25 points 1 day ago

How to kill Chrome faster, make it AI only. LOL!!!

load more comments
view more: next ›