this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2025
24 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

9553 readers
803 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

  2. Election Interference / Misinformation

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
all 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 10 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I think the only path forward is for journalists to get serious about defining and protecting their job. No government is going to step in to do it because of the optics, but many sectors have colleges that define and enforce standards of behaviour.

It's time for journalists to step up and do the same.

[–] Mavvik@lemmy.ca 8 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I think this is a great idea. A professional accreditation that is managed by journalists would definitely help with preventing misinformation and disinformation. Require certain number of years working under a professional journalist and an ethics exam (similar to PEng) to be a "Professional journalist". Then government can legislate rules at the recommendation of this body around whether an organization can be called a "news organization" and is protected by freedom of the press laws. This way the managing body can strip people of their professional accreditation for peddling misinformation and disinformation and general journalistic malpractice.

[–] OminousOrange@lemmy.ca 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

There would need to be public members of the board as well or it could very quickly turn into an old boys club.

[–] Mavvik@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 hours ago

Yeah, that's done in the professional organization I'm familiar with and I assume with others too

[–] Pronell@lemmy.world 9 points 23 hours ago

The paradox of tolerance.

You cannot tolerate those who will not tolerate others. Those acting in bad faith will always work to tear down.

[–] turnip@sh.itjust.works -3 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

implied First Nations have falsely claimed that unmarked graves have been found at former residential schools.

This did happen. It was a fake story, and it made up much of the questions of our last debate, which took a lot of time away from questions of the rising cost of living.

https://nypost.com/2022/05/27/kamloops-mass-grave-debunked-biggest-fake-news-in-canada/

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 4 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

I’m not taking the right-wing rag with mixed factually seriously.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/new-york-post/

The Post has been criticized since the beginning of Murdoch's ownership for sensationalism, blatant advocacy, and conservative bias. In 1980, the Columbia Journalism Review stated that the "New York Post is no longer merely a journalistic problem. It is a social problem—a force for evil."

In a 2004 survey conducted by Pace University, the Post was rated the least-credible major news outlet in New York, and the only news outlet to receive more responses calling it "not credible" than credible (44% not credible to 39% credible)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Post?wprov=sfti1#Content,_coverage_and_criticism

[–] turnip@sh.itjust.works -1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Is this one better?

https://www.cbc.ca/news/corrections-clarifications-1.5893564

No body was ever found, just something lumpy in the ground.