this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2025
212 points (96.5% liked)

Technology

2484 readers
362 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Stern@lemmy.world 38 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Jack Dorsey, who owns dozens of patents, conveniently does not opt to lead the charge by cancelling them all.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

To be absolutely fair, and I dont trust billionaire cunts. Sometimes that just doesnt make sense, it isnt like open sourcing doesnt exist, it hasnt triggered a shift to Jack Dorseys ilk's big tech companies.

[–] xor@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 days ago

you could try asking him to put his money where his mouth is

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 19 points 6 days ago

So what are the chances he means no copyright for everyone, versus that he means copyright shouldn't affect corporations?

[–] Cargon@lemmy.ml 15 points 6 days ago

Delete all P = NP law. Return the sand from whence it came.

[–] Thcdenton@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago

Sure. Let's start with publishing and copyright.

[–] Tiger_Man_@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 6 days ago

Delete all internet protocol

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

i mean, i hate IP law as well, i like stealing shit.

[–] milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 8 points 6 days ago

If there's no IP law you can't steal IP any more. Hah!

[–] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 10 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Actually fully agreed. IP, trademarks, copyright, all that shit just serves to make the rich richer and stifle innovation.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] C126@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 days ago
load more comments
view more: next ›