this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

news

23979 readers
771 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today/ . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Image is from Wikipedia's article on the war..


I've wanted to cover Myanmar for a while now but haven't had the needed knowledge to write much more than "This situation really sucks." After doing a little reading on the situation, I feel even more confused. A decent analogy is the Syrian Civil War, at least while Assad was in power (though it's still pretty true today) - many different opposition groups, some co-operating with the United States, others not. The main government supported partially by an anti-American superpower, but who could live with that government collapsing if there are deals to be made with the group coming into power. A conflict kept going and exploited at least partially by the United States and other imperial core powers, though with plenty of genuine domestic animosity and desires for political independence.

Recently, the Myanmar government - the mainstream media uses "junta", which is probably accurate despite the connotations - has promised elections at the end of 2025. This doesn't seem likely to happen, and even if it did, how this would work in a country as war-torn as Myanmar is unclear. The government is losing territory and soldiers at a quick pace; they now hold only 21% of the country, though that 21% does at least comprise many of the cities. It's difficult to get a handle on the number of people affected because civil wars and insurgencies have been ongoing in some shape or form for decades, but we're talking at least millions displaced and thousands of civilians killed.

Here's a comment by @TheGenderWitch@hexbear.net from fairly recently that covers the situation in Myanmar:

comment

The military government of Myanmar is losing to the Rebel Groups, and badly. https://www.voanews.com/a/myanmar-s-rebels-closing-in-around-junta-into-fifth-year-of-civil-war-/7958145.html

somethings really afoot though, news about myanmar from western outlets and channels have suddenly all remembered myanmar exists and written quite a lot about them in the last few days. Its suspicious, it could be capitalists trying to signal their want for US involvement in the civil war. It could also be a targeted propaganda campaign already pre planned in order to make sure people are clued into the conflict.

I think this seems to be another Assad situation. The Military government is pretty unpopular domestically and is losing quite a bit of ground. I would be surprised if they lasted to 2027. Supplied by both Russia and China, theyve been able to keep some flow of weapons, but are suffering a lot from manpower issues. Conscription has been enacted, but conscripts are a poor replacement for trained soldiers. According to reports, they only hold about 21% of the land and are losing lots of territory. They also have extended their emergency rule for another 6 months, throwing doubt on the ability to follow through with their 2025 election. They've lost large amounts of territory, thousands of soldiers, and 2 regional commands. They're not dead yet though, as they have some ability to retake some territory and win some battles, but again 21%. Rebels currently are making steady progress towards the second largest city in the country.

while I don't like the rebels, they are western aligned, they have popular support and are allied to many of Myanmar's ethnic minority defence groups. Im wondering who really has the power in this situation though, since many of the gains seem to be made by the Ethnic armies, not the NUG. This revolutionary energy could be fueled to establish a socialist federation, but won't, and the popular revolutionary energy is fueled toward the NUG. It'll probably be another pro-west bourgeoisie democracy. It will probably then turn against the ethnic rebels and we'll end up basically where myanmar was pre coup. Probably will have a strong military influence on politics as well, since the rebel forces seem to be made up of officers and very little political groups. By then, people will be extremely tired of war and more likely to accept any conflict resolution than another civil war. In the midst of "It Happened" stands a stronger, unmovable "nothing ever happens". Would be neat if the Communist Party of Burma could somehow come out on top, but they have only around 1000 soldiers and don't control a large amount of territory.

China's interests in the region are still secure, but siding with the Junta is a bad idea, one I understand though. China doesn't want a western aligned power to take over a china aligned state, and is trying to make sure their economic investments in the area are protected and their mineral income is continued. They have deep ties with many Ethnic Minority states, especially on their border, and the NUG forces, mostly again to protect infrastructure investments and keep the minerals flowing. They might flip back to the NUG as the Junta starts collapsing over the next year or so, especially since the new US administration seems to be really cutting back on foreign aid. The General in charge of the rebel government forces complained quite a bit about how much aid ukraine got and how much he wanted that aid. He was basically begging for anti aircraft systems "like in ukraine" lol. China could definitely swoop in and back the rebels, which while hurting their reputation, is probably the best move long term. China's only interest is to keep Myanmar from being pro-west, keep control of Myanmar's mineral flow, and protect other investments in the area.


Last week's thread is here.
The Imperialism Reading Group is here.

Please check out the HexAtlas!

The bulletins site is here. Currently not used.
The RSS feed is here. Also currently not used.

Israel-Palestine Conflict

If you have evidence of Israeli crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.

Sources on the fighting in Palestine against Israel. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

UNRWA reports on Israel's destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news.
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.

English-language PalestineResist telegram channel.
More telegram channels here for those interested.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Sources:

Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.

Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:

Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Redcuban1959@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

So, from what I understand about Myanmar/Burma, the two main factions are the Junta/Tatmadaw and the National Unity Government/People's Defense Force. Besides them, there are some ethnic armies that are supported by the US and China. And it seems that both the US and China have also tried a peace deal between the Junta and the NUG, but it doesn't seem to have worked. The junta doesn't want the military and its friends to lose their privileges and doesn't seem to have any real ideology beyond the fact that they want to rule Myanmar.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] homhom9000@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

"Pro Palestine" hacker group dark storm is taking credit for taking down Twitter multiple times today. Cool if true but it made me do work today.

https://x.com/DD_Geopolitics/status/1899157996036673857

Edit: added quotes to pro Palestine since I don't know the nature of the group or their motives beyond taking down Twitter. It's weird to target Twitter itself and not thousands of other things too.

[–] bbnh69420@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago

Repost:

The Syrian terror regime has started a cleanup operation in advance of any international visitors, specifically the UN delegation. From planting weapons and stripping bodies to put on military gear to straight-up dumping bodies in the ocean, maximum effort is being put in to obscure what really has occurred. They haven’t stopped the killing (despite the announcement of the “military operation’s” end), they’re simply trying to minimize what has already happened.

https://t.me/CoastSyrian24/902

[–] ProletarianDictator@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Interested in learning more about Myanmar, especially a breakdown of various factions, including allies, approximate strength, and their current terrorities. Not even sure where to find reputable info on the situation.

One big note: China probably wants stability in the region more than caring about the specifics of who governs it, as long as whoever is in charge is willing to join BRI (likely regardless, given the need to rebuild infrastructure after a war.)

Myanmar could serve as the shortest path to get Chinese goods to the sea if the West were ever able to encircle them and blockade the strait of Malacca. So a BRI project here could mitigate the damage of the US Navy's biggest strategic advantage in a hypothetical war scenario.

So China likely wants to play a role in rebuilding the country, regardless of who is in charge. Given their border has been a hotspot of human and drug trafficking, they have plenty of reasons to support a quick end to the war, even if the winners don't align with their interests. I think this is why they initially aligned with the junta, hoping they could quickly regain control.

However Western friendly the winning faction or coalition is, it's probably not friendly enough to outright reject Chinese assistance in rebuilding, so the US probably wants to keep the situation an ongoing mess that never becomes stable enough for infrastructure, which is also probably why the US media apparatus largely ignores the situation.

[–] Lemister@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Myanmar has the secret AES state more obscure than Laos.

spoiler(Wa State)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BountifulEggnog@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

US-flagged oil tanker collides with container ship in North Sea

Both ships caught fire and were abandoned, 32 people injured and one missing.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Redcuban1959@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The Chancellor of Suriname, Albert Ramdin, has been elected by acclamation as the new Secretary General of the Organization of American States, the OAS. His name gained traction after Brazil withdrew its support for Paraguayan Chancellor Ramírez Lezcano, seen as pro-Trump and potentially an arm of the US.

Brazil's move prompted Chile, Bolivia, Colombia and Uruguay to also discard their votes for Paraguay, converting them into support for Suriname. Paraguay withdrew Ramírez's candidacy and Ramdin was elected with no competitors.

  • Telegram

As I said it before, this is more or less just a symbolic victory for the Pink Tide goverments

[–] MarmiteLover123@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

It's now just past midnight in Israel now, March 11 in the morning. Ansarallah in Yemen (known was the Houthis in western media) has said that they will restart their attacks on March 11 if aid is not allowed into Gaza. There are no signs of Israel allowing aid into Gaza, in fact they've even cut off the electrical supply to Gaza within the last few days. So we can expect Ansarallah to launch some attacks within the next 24-48 hours, if not tonight. Israeli air defences are said to be on high alert, in particular the Arrow ABM systems. Why would Ansarallah resume their attacks on Israel and the US Navy?

  • Firstly, the situation in Gaza is not good. The ceasefire is up in the air, and there is no humanitarian aid entering the Gaza strip. Without any further actions in opposition of Israel, the situation could get worse. The most important thing is to get these people some relief, some breathing room. The Israeli genocide has been catastrophic and murdered hundreds of thousands by now.

  • Ansarallah might think that attacks on Yemen are inevitable, given recent US Navy and CENTCOM movements in the region, including the return of the Harry S. Truman Carrier Strike Group to the Red Sea, and CENTCOM General Kurilla meeting with Saudi Arabian and Yemeni opposition officals. So it is better for Ansarallah to strike first and take the initiative.

  • The second point fits in here with this third one, which is more broad. Ansarallah might think that continuing a low level conflict against Israel and the US Navy suits their interests. They were the biggest winners over the past two years from an axis of resistance perspective, being able to accomplish their strategic objective (a naval blockade in the Red Sea) with minimal losses. Sure they were unable to sink or hit a US Navy ship despite some close calls, but the US Navy were unable to get shipping traffic back to normal levels and provide adequate protection for cargo ships. Thus Ansarallah accomplished their strategic objective. Waging a just war against Israeli genocide is going to be very popular and unifying (for obvious reasons) among Yemenis who might otherwise have issues with them. Wartime and peacetime governance are two very different things. So a continuation of conflict could very well be in Ansarallah's interests now, to try force the US and Israel to accept their very simple and just demands of letting aid into Gaza. This runs the risk of provoking a further US-Israeli response, but that is a risk Ansarallah seems willing to take given that the US and Israel have been unable to hinder them much so far.

[–] sewer_rat_420@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago

Holy shit, I hadn't seen that graph and hadn't quite comprehended the scale of Ansarallah's success in their blockade. Do we know how much it has recovered since the ceasefire? I surely hope they follow through, although not looking forward to the US response. But your assessment seems correct in that they know Yemen and Houthi controlled areas will be bombed, if not now, at some point.

I don't know Trumps true motives, but a successful blockade would further worsen America's economic collapse. And of course it harms Israel. Perhaps it could be the factor that pushes through a deal to extend the ceasefire.

With this weekend's arrest of Mahmoud Khalil and Israel/MENA issues pushed back into the forefront, a high increase of suppression for dissenting speech in this area seems likely to occur. Not looking good for those who dislike increasing fascism.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Redcuban1959@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago

Pope Francis' improvement “further consolidated”, says Vatican; doctors withdraw guarded prognosis. However, in view of the complexity of the clinical picture, the Pontiff will remain “in a hospital environment for a few more days”

[–] Redcuban1959@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Ukraine accepts 30-day ceasefire with Russia proposed by the United States. However, Russian acceptance is still required. The agreement provides for US protection by air, sky and land and the exploitation of Ukrainian minerals.

  • Telegram
[–] ziggurter@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago

The agreement provides for US protection by air, sky and land and the exploitation of Ukrainian minerals.

So is this just a, "Once again, Russia: please accept NATO on your doorstep"?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] sexywheat@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Originally restricted only to products from "red states", British Columbia is now taking all Yank liquor off the shelves of the state-owned enterprise BC Liquor.

Death to America.

“Today, we are ordering the removal of all American beer, wine, spirits and refreshment beverages from the shelves at BCLIQUOR stores. The stores carry hundreds of types of U.S. alcohol that the BC Liquor Distribution Branch will also no longer be purchasing.

[–] Sulv@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago (6 children)

State-owned liquor stores? Idk how I feel about that one lol

[–] SoyViking@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

In Sweden the state alcohol monopoly Systembolaget keeps the price of cheap liquor high, presumably curbing alcoholism and teen drinking but they are also Europe's largest buyer of alcohol, enabling them to get really good deals from producers, making higher quality wine, beer and liquor surprisingly reasonably priced there.

The existence of an alcohol monopoly has promoted a moonshine culture in Sweden as well as significant smuggling and cross-border trade, made easy by the very mild border regime on the border to Denmark. There's also a culture of alcohol tourism where Swedes go to Denmark to drink cheap booze, leading to "the drunk Swede who can't hold his liquor" being a stereotype in Denmark.

[–] MarxusMaximus@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago

As someone who used to live in Sweden, I really miss Systembolaget. They have tens of thousands of products and free delivery so the amount of choices are amazing. The hard liquor is really expensive but the beer and wine is pretty reasonably priced. There's a sort of price floor when it comes to the wine, though, they don't sell any super cheap wines like they do in every grocery store in Southern Europe.

[–] StillNoLeftLeft@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's interesting how this is a result of prohibition days and at least in Finland the working class struggle that saw alcohol as one of the things keeping the proles disengaged. The bourge was and is very much for free markets for alcohol and the debate and boundary drawing goes on to this day. One of thr first things our right wing goverment did was allow stronger alcohol in the grocery stores that you could previously only get from ALKO (Finnish systembolaget).

Afaik there has also always been a strong boozemaker and brewer lobby that opposes the state run alcohol monopoly.

What reading about this history and what Parenti had to say about all this made me think about it more. I'd very much been in the freedom of choice gang in the past. But it's more complicated.

Funnily the Finns get the cheaper booze from Tallin and the cruise boats between Finland and Sweden, making the drunk "uncivilized" Finns a stereotype in Sweden, or at least re-enforces it.

[–] anaesidemus@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago

The right-wingers in Iceland keep trying to abolish the monopoly or get beer in grocery stores, because market freedom and the state shouldn't do things. But of course it's really because it's incredibly lucrative for the grocery stores and the breweries here, same as Finland.

Since we don't have a neighbour for cheaper alcohol we make stereotypes about Danes having alcohol at kids birthday parties.

[–] sexywheat@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Gotta pay for our health care somehow ¯_(ツ)_/¯

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] CleverOleg@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Saw that the US stock market is now down after opening ok, and spontaneously started singing “down down to goblin town, down down to goblin town”

I wish this actually was a crash, but the reality is that stocks have inflated so much since COVID and especially over the last year, they have so much further to fall before we are even back to that level.

[–] xiaohongshu@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

I have heard elsewhere that this is the Deep State finally showing their hands, to terrify the Trump administration into submission. One point that is believable is that such large movement of capital, at least at the onset, was likely coordinated.

Another point is that a lot of that money is still American capital, and from an imperialist standpoint, they are merely tools of finance capital that can be channeled somewhere to achieve a certain goal. For example, they can infiltrate the developing economies (especially into China) under the cover of a mass selloff and thus reduced the suspicion of such large volume of foreign capital flooding the Global South. (In fact, I have been saying for a while now that there is simply too much American dollars printed under the Biden administration that I cannot imagine them not going to the foreign sector i.e. the Global South)

But this is all speculation and we don’t know what’s actually going on inside the core of the American power structure. It will be interesting to see how the Trump administration respond to this.

[–] SchillMenaker@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago

Respond to this? They're the ones doing it.

[–] Eldungeon2@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago

Capital Strike? Imperialism coming home and all I suppose. Saw some articles suggesting that European stocks were rallying as a reaction to the US volatility (also another was bullish from the Europeans tough talk about doing war Keynesianism following the US de-funding NATO); but how long can the west park stock on that sinking ship?

[–] Sulv@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago

At first I was like jesse-wtf, but the more I think about you might be on to something let-em-cook

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MaxOS@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MarmiteLover123@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The Ukrainian Kursk adventure is officially over. The Ukrainians are retreating from Sudzha, the largest town in Kursk that was still under Ukrainian control, on mass, literally running away and back to Ukraine, abandoning equipment and vehicles while the Russians enter Sudzha. Russian troops have raised the Russian flag at the church in Zamost'e just southeast of Sudzha, and less than 10km from the Russia - Ukraine border. The remaining Ukrainian troop concentrations are being bombed by the Russian Air Force, including the use of helicopters, Su-25 CAS aircraft, and Orion UAVs. There's very little Ukrainian anti aircraft coverage left in Kursk. This is the worst possible time for this to happen for Ukraine.

Geolocated video of Ukrainian forces walking out of Sudzha

Xcancel mirror

[–] Cowbee@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Did that end up accomplishing anything for Ukraine materially, other than temporary PR?

[–] MarmiteLover123@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

In the beginning (the first two to three weeks in August 2024) it was a well executed operation, being able to take some Russian territory (around 1000km²), not marauding forward into Russian defensive traps. If Ukraine had immediately retreated back into Ukraine afterwards it could have been viewed as a success. But instead they decided to double down, first trying to take the nuclear power plant in the region (main strategic objective) in a failed offensive, which led to Ukrainian mechanised units falling into Russian defensive traps and being destroyed by Orion and Forpost UCAVs, along with Russian artillery (the Ukrainian forces pushed too far ahead, outside of their own artillery and air defence coverage). This was the first mistake. Ukraine really should have retreated after failing to take their main strategic point. Holding onto some random villages and farms in Russia doesn't accomplish much.

Then the Ukrainians made the mistake of tripling down, choosing to occupy the 900 or so square kilometres of Kursk that they held at this point, instead of retreating back to Ukraine, hoping that they would be able to exchange hundreds of kilometres of land in Kursk for thousands of kilometres in Ukraine. This was the biggest, and in the end fatal, mistake. Although the Ukrainians were able use their best units in Kursk to attrit Russian forces initially (Russia has lost over 400 armoured vehicles in Kursk, around 350 IFVs and APCS, and 60 tanks) and were able to hold onto the territory, this was a big strategic mistake as it allowed Russia to make rapid (in the context of this war) advances all along the eastern front from September 2024 to January 2025, while Ukraine's best units were occupied in Kursk trying to inflict maximum damage on Russia (and increasingly failing as the battles wore on). Multiple Ukrainian fortress cities fell in the east, and Russia was capturing more territory in Ukraine in a couple of days than Ukraine held in Kursk in total. It also gave Russia and North Korea the perfect excuse to deploy North Korean artillery and rocket troops to Kursk, given their mutual defence pact, with North Korean artillery, air defence, and ballistic missile systems visible within Russia, and eventually in combat positions. The fantasy that Russia would perform some unequal/asymmetric territory exchange, instead of just kicking the Ukrainians out of Kursk eventually, started to collapse.

From then on after this massive strategic error by Ukraine, it just continued to get worse. Ukraine's best units were worn down and being destroyed by Russia as slowly but surely, they took more and more territory in Kursk back. Before this massive offensive by Russia, Ukraine held onto around 360km² of territory in Kursk, just over a third of what they originally had. Then the supply situation became complicated as the Kursk salient became operationally encircled, with only one supply road in and out, that was under complete fire control by Russian by Russian artillery and FPV drones. At this point, the fate of the Kursk salient was sealed, even an organised retreat would face massive losses.

Ukrainian air defences then collapsed, with Ukraine losing one of their rare and their most valuable air defence systems, an S300V battery in Sumy (they only had around 6 batteries from the USSR). This battery was destroyed in two seperate Iskander-M ballistic missile strikes. With this S300V system destroyed, Russian Orion and Forpost UCAVs were able to fly within Ukrainian airspace themselves, conducting drone strikes in Sumy, flying over 10km inside of Ukraine. The Russian Air Force was then able to bomb the Ukrainian salient in Kursk at a scale never seen before, with FAB-3000s raining down on Ukrainian positions in Kursk. By then it was too late for an organized retreat, and now it's an every man for himself situation with the Ukrainians retreating back to Ukraine as fast as possible. Ukraine controlled about 180km² of Kursk 10 hours ago, now they probably control much less.

[–] Cowbee@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago

Thanks for the detailed write-up, comrade! This megathread is one of the best parts of this site, and comrades like you make it so. heart-sickle

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›