this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2025

134 points (98.6% liked)

Selfhosted

45541 readers

1221 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
No spam posting.
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
No trolling.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz

134

How to harden against SSH brute-forcing? (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 1 day ago by someacnt@sh.itjust.works to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

122 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Recently, I discovered that SSH of my VPS server is constantly battered as follows.

Apr 06 11:15:14 abastro-personal-arm sshd[102702]: Unable to negotiate with 218.92.0.201 port 53768: no matching key exchange method found. Their offer: diffie>
Apr 06 11:30:29 abastro-personal-arm sshd[102786]: Unable to negotiate with 218.92.0.207 port 18464: no matching key exchange method found. Their offer: diffie>
Apr 06 11:45:36 abastro-personal-arm sshd[102881]: Unable to negotiate with 218.92.0.209 port 59634: no matching key exchange method found. Their offer: diffie>
Apr 06 12:01:02 abastro-personal-arm sshd[103019]: Unable to negotiate with 218.92.0.203 port 16976: no matching key exchange method found. Their offer: diffie>
Apr 06 12:05:49 abastro-personal-arm sshd[103066]: Unable to negotiate with 218.92.0.212 port 49130: no matching key exchange method found. Their offer: diffie>
Apr 06 12:07:09 abastro-personal-arm sshd[103077]: Connection closed by 162.142.125.122 port 56110 [preauth]
Apr 06 12:12:18 abastro-personal-arm sshd[103154]: Connection closed by 45.79.181.223 port 22064 [preauth]
Apr 06 12:12:19 abastro-personal-arm sshd[103156]: Connection closed by 45.79.181.223 port 22078 [preauth]
Apr 06 12:12:20 abastro-personal-arm sshd[103158]: Connection closed by 45.79.181.223 port 22112 [preauth]
Apr 06 12:21:26 abastro-personal-arm sshd[103253]: Connection closed by 118.25.174.89 port 36334 [preauth]
Apr 06 12:23:39 abastro-personal-arm sshd[103282]: Unable to negotiate with 218.92.0.252 port 59622: no matching key exchange method found. Their offer: diffie>
Apr 06 12:26:38 abastro-personal-arm sshd[103312]: Connection closed by 92.118.39.73 port 44400
Apr 06 12:32:22 abastro-personal-arm sshd[103373]: Unable to negotiate with 218.92.0.203 port 57092: no matching key exchange method found. Their offer: diffie>
Apr 06 12:49:48 abastro-personal-arm sshd[103556]: error: maximum authentication attempts exceeded for root from 98.22.89.155 port 53675 ssh2 [preauth]
Apr 06 12:49:48 abastro-personal-arm sshd[103556]: Disconnecting authenticating user root 98.22.89.155 port 53675: Too many authentication failures [preauth]
Apr 06 12:49:51 abastro-personal-arm sshd[103558]: error: maximum authentication attempts exceeded for root from 98.22.89.155 port 53775 ssh2 [preauth]
Apr 06 12:49:51 abastro-personal-arm sshd[103558]: Disconnecting authenticating user root 98.22.89.155 port 53775: Too many authentication failures [preauth]
Apr 06 12:49:53 abastro-personal-arm sshd[103561]: error: maximum authentication attempts exceeded for root from 98.22.89.155 port 53829 ssh2 [preauth]
Apr 06 12:49:53 abastro-personal-arm sshd[103561]: Disconnecting authenticating user root 98.22.89.155 port 53829: Too many authentication failures [preauth]
Apr 06 12:49:54 abastro-personal-arm sshd[103563]: Connection closed by 98.22.89.155 port 53862 [preauth]
Apr 06 12:50:41 abastro-personal-arm sshd[103576]: Invalid user  from 75.12.134.50 port 36312
Apr 06 12:54:26 abastro-personal-arm sshd[103621]: Connection closed by 165.140.237.71 port 54236
Apr 06 13:01:26 abastro-personal-arm sshd[103702]: Connection closed by 193.32.162.132 port 33380
Apr 06 13:03:40 abastro-personal-arm sshd[103724]: Unable to negotiate with 218.92.0.204 port 60446: no matching key exchange method found. Their offer: diffie>
Apr 06 13:11:49 abastro-personal-arm sshd[103815]: Received disconnect from 165.140.237.71 port 50952:11:  [preauth]
Apr 06 13:11:49 abastro-personal-arm sshd[103815]: Disconnected from authenticating user root 165.140.237.71 port 50952 [preauth]
Apr 06 13:19:08 abastro-personal-arm sshd[103897]: Unable to negotiate with 218.92.0.208 port 59274: no matching key exchange method found. Their offer: diffie>
Apr 06 13:33:36 abastro-personal-arm sshd[104066]: Received disconnect from 165.140.237.71 port 50738:11:  [preauth]
Apr 06 13:33:36 abastro-personal-arm sshd[104066]: Disconnected from authenticating user ubuntu 165.140.237.71 port 50738 [preauth]
Apr 06 13:34:50 abastro-personal-arm sshd[104079]: Unable to negotiate with 218.92.0.204 port 44816: no matching key exchange method found. Their offer: diffie>
Apr 06 13:50:32 abastro-personal-arm sshd[104249]: Unable to negotiate with 218.92.0.206 port 27286: no matching key exchange method found. Their offer: diffie>
Apr 06 13:51:58 abastro-personal-arm sshd[104261]: Received disconnect from 165.140.237.71 port 50528:11:  [preauth]
Apr 06 13:51:58 abastro-personal-arm sshd[104261]: Disconnected from authenticating user root 165.140.237.71 port 50528 [preauth]
Apr 06 14:01:25 abastro-personal-arm sshd[104351]: Invalid user  from 65.49.1.29 port 18519
Apr 06 14:01:28 abastro-personal-arm sshd[104351]: Connection closed by invalid user  65.49.1.29 port 18519 [preauth]

As you can see, it is happening quite frequently, and I am worried one might break in at some point. Since SSH access guards users with root-access, it can be quite serious once penetrated. How do I harden against these kind of attacks? Because this is VPS, disabling SSH is a no-go (SSH is my only entry of access). Are there ways to stop some of these attackers?

As always, thanks in advance!

(page 2) 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Dima@feddit.uk 28 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

For security disable password authentication - use public key instead, disable root login via ssh - use sudo or su from another user.

To reduce the number of attempts of others trying to get in change the ssh port and/or set-up fail2ban.

You could also set a firewall rule to only allow ssh from your IP address, if you have a static address at home and only need access from there, or have a way to VPN into your home network. Make sure you have a static address if you do this though, you don't want your IP to change and be left locked out of your server.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You could also set a firewall rule to only allow ssh from your IP address

You can also broaden this to a region. You may still want to access SSH from various places around your country (e.g. when visiting family or friends), but likely won't ever need to from most of the rest of the world, so block everything except IPs from your region (or regions you care about, e.g. any VPSs you have).

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] RonnyZittledong@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Disable passwords and use public private keys and don't worry about it

[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is the only answer you need to read. It's a non-problem if you just do this, and there's no reason not to do it.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] sntx@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

https://media.ccc.de/v/38c3-attack-mining-how-to-use-distributed-sensors-to-identify-and-take-down-adversaries

[–] Realitaetsverlust@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You don't. This is normal. Ensure key-only auth, ensure you do not login directly as root, maybe install fail2ban and you're good. Some people move the port to a nonstandard one, but that only helps with automated scanners not determined attackers.

You could look into port-knocking if you want it really safe.

[–] suicidaleggroll@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Some people move the port to a nonstandard one, but that only helps with automated scanners not determined attackers.

While true, cleaning up your logs such that you can actually see a determined attacker rather than it just getting buried in the noise is still worthwhile.

[–] Waryle@jlai.lu 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

You can look up for:

Setting up max authentication attemps per connection -> slows up a lot brute force attacks. If your password is strong enough, that's already a big step to secure your server.
Generate SSH Keys and disable password authentication -> do this only if you're connecting through the same devices, because you won't be able to connect from any device that has not being set up. Personally I don't use this because I want to be able to access my server even if I'm not home and without my laptop
Set up Crowdsec -> it's a local service which scans logs and will block access to any suspicious IPs. It also relies on a crowdsourced list of IPs that are identified as threat and will preventively block them

load more comments (3 replies)

[–] EarMaster@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

For a general guide on how to make ssh more secure I stick to https://www.sshaudit.com/

You can check your config and they also provide step by step guides for several distros...

[–] troed@fedia.io 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

A few replies here give the correct advice. Others are just way off.

To those of you who wrote anything else than "disable passwords, use key based login only and you're good" - please spend more time learning the subject before offering up advice to others.

(fail2ban is nice to run in addition, I do so myself, but it's more for to stop wasting resources than having to do with security since no one is bruteforcing keys)

[–] nekusoul@lemmy.nekusoul.de 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Eh, while I agree that some recommendations are dodgy at best, I'll argue that Wireguard is not only adding to security, it also makes Fail2Ban obsolete. Due to the way it works, you'll completely hide the fact that you're even running a SSH server at all, and this includes even Wireguard itself. More importantly though, it's pretty much impossible to set up Wireguard in an insecure way, whereas SSH provides you with plenty of footguns. You're not risking locking yourself out either.

Also, security comes in layers.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

You’re not risking locking yourself out either.

In a VPS, you should always be able to fall back to the web console. So locking yourself out shouldn't be a major concern.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There's more to it than that.

I recommend geoip blocking anything outside of your expected operating regions in addition to using key-based logins. iptables operates at a lower level in the network stack than SSH, so the vulnerability surface is a lot lower, and blocking before something actually looks at the packets cleans up the logs. This is huge because it makes it a lot more obvious when there's a legitimate attack.

Cover yourself with layers:

block obviously bad packets at the firewall level
eliminate insecure modes of login (only allow key-based login)
something like fail2ban to ban the few who make it through 1 & 2
use a secure root password so if someone does get in, they're less likely to get root access
have your services run as non-privileged users to limit issues if something gets compromised

If you only do one thing, it should be only allowing key-based logins. If you do two, run SSH on a non-standard port or set up geoip blocking (second is more work, but a lot more effective).

[–] troed@fedia.io 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Still no. Here's the reasoning: A well known SSHd is the most secure codebase you'll find out there. With key-based login only, it's not possible to brute force entry. Thus, changing port or running fail2ban doesn't add anything to the security of your system, it just gets rid of bot login log entries and some - very minimal - resource usage.

If there's a public SSHd exploit out, attackers will portscan and and find your SSHd anyway. If there's a 0-day out it's the same.

(your points 4 and 5 are outside the scope of the SSH discussion)

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] hemmes@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What VPS are you using?

You should be able to setup a firewall, blocking all access to the SSH port. Then setup a VPN so that only you can access via SSH after making your VPN connection.

If you connect via a static IP, you can also create an ACL for the VPN connection just in case. You can set an ACL for the SSH port forward rule directly as well, but I don’t like that personally. I prefer keeping things behind the VPN.

[–] peregus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Exactly, this I what alI do!

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is the correct answer. Never expose your SSH port on the public web, always use a VPN. Tailscale, Netmaker or Netbird make it piss easy to connect to your VPS securely, and because they all use NAT traversal you don't have to open any ports in your firewall.

Combine this with configuring UFW on the server (in addition to the firewall from the VPS provider - layered defence is king) and Fail2Ban. SSH keys are also a good idea. And of course disable root SSH just in case.

With a multi-layered defence like this you will be functionally impervious to brute force attacks. And while each layer of protection may have an undiscovered exploit, it will be unlikely that there are exploits to bypass every layer simultaneously (Note for the pendants; I said "unlikely", not "impossible". No defence is perfect).

[–] troed@fedia.io 5 points 1 day ago (15 children)

This is not "the correct answer". There's absolutely nothing wrong with "exposing" SSH.

load more comments (15 replies)

[–] AceSLS@ani.social 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Like others said, disable password auth and setup auth keys instead.

Bonus points for moving the ssh port, using fail2ban and also setting up a tarpit with something like endlessh.

If you wanna go extreme use Wireguard to connect to your server and only allow ssh over wireguard in your firewall.

[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

fail2ban is mandatory equipment for any ssh server accessible to the public especially on its default port. It's highly configurable, but the default settings will do fine at making it statistically impossible for any user or password to be brute forced.

[–] cron@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don’t really get the love for fail2ban. Sure, it helps keep your logs clean, but with a solid SSH setup (root disabled, SSH keys enforced), I’m not bothered by the login attempts.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

You should be. Most of it's noise, but if there's a serious attack, you'll appreciate clean logs.

I think fail2ban is nice as like a third or fourth layer of defense. In order of my priorities:

key-only login, root login completely disabled
solid root password, and user privilege separation (have each service use its own user)
geoip bans - if you never plan to support clients in a given region, block it at the firewall level (or better yet, whitelist the handful of regions you care about); I do this by port, so SSH gets a much more restricted set of allowed regions than HTTPS
fail2ban - especially if you have a relatively large whitelist
only access SSH over a Wireguard VPN - Wireguard doesn't show up in port scans, and SSH can bind to the VPN host instead of 0.0.0.0, so the ability to login via SSH will be completely hidden

If you're not going to do 3-5, at least change the default SSH port to cut down on log noise.

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

https://www.crowdsec.net/

Take the concept of Fail2Ban and add in a community blocklist of thousands of IPs so that you’re blocking not only IPs that have attacked you, but others as well.

It’s neat because they have a number of collections you can download from the community that include readymade parsers for other kinds of logs, and other attack scenarios you can guard against. For example, if you run Nginx or Caddy as webservers on that machine, you can download associated collections for each that can parse your web access log files and ban IPs based on IPs probing your web server for unprotected admin panels, or abusive AI crawlers.

You can even write your own scenarios. I wrote one that immediately blocks you after just one attempt to log in using an account like root, admin,adm,administrator, etc.

[–] irmadlad@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

+1 for Crowdsec

[–] demesisx@infosec.pub 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

If you can use another method, disabling SSH entirely would do it. ;)

This is how Talos Linux achieves best-in-class security properties.

https://www.siderolabs.com/blog/how-to-ssh-into-talos-linux/

[–] tal@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago

If you use keys or strong passwords, it really shouldn't be practical for someone to brute-force.

You can make it more-obnoxious via all sorts of security-through-obscurity routes like portknocking or fail2ban or whatever, or disable direct root login via PermitRootLogin, but those aren't very effective compared to just using strong credentials.

load more comments