this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2025
783 points (99.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

6343 readers
579 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Access options:

Yes, this means a ton of carbon ends up in the atmosphere instead of in the trees. The right move would be thinning and prescribed burns, but this administration isn't going to do that.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 8 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

The USA will resemble Russia, China and Mordor.

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 9 points 13 hours ago

A hundred years from now the planet will be in a pretty good shape, forests have been regrown and the seas will have been cleaned up and repopulated with fish, except for the US which is a giant hole. Not from bombs exploding, but from strip-mining the whole place for resources.

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

didn't he say it would be like 0.5% of all federal land, or something.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 13 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

One difference between the fascists and the rest of us is that for us, words have meaning, while for the fascists, they're only a tool for manipulation when spoken to somebody they see as inferior.

tbf he may have said that for housing, but yeah, this admin is excessively stupid. They haven't exactly demonstrated competency.

[–] StopTouchingYourPhone@lemmy.world 10 points 15 hours ago

March '23 Trump gave a soundbite for his billionaire bosses about building "Freedom Cities." Clear-cutting national forests, then signing an order that makes the area exempt from regulation? Sounds about right.

If they're coming for all federally governed land, indigenous reservations will be on the menu as well (always are).

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 7 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (2 children)

🙏🏼✝️🔯☯️🕉️ Gods of the universe that ever existed real or fictional Please hear our prayers and please peacefully take this man home. His destruction is too much for the good people of earth to bear. Please consider taking Putin and Netanyahu too Than You. Amen

[–] quid_pro_joe@infosec.pub 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

God here (taking temporary control of a random human as I don't have a mobile device, or thumbs for that matter): I gave y'all free choice - and I'm not talkin' 'bout the vote. Turn off the telly and go start a revolution! (or join an existing rebellion, if you prefer) All my love, God(s)

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

I’m agnostic but I had to try.

[–] FilthyHookerSpit@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Vance would arguably be worse.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago

He doesn’t have the cult backing. I honestly think the cult would fracture

[–] Knoxvomica@lemmy.ca 27 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Holy shit, America, you are so fucked at this point.

[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 7 points 13 hours ago

It only the damage was contained within the USA's borders.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 23 points 20 hours ago
[–] jaemo@sh.itjust.works 10 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Gee, why wouldn't I want to cede my country to American management and become the 51st state? You guys are knocking it out of the park, no pun intended.

Already bad enough here in Ontario with Doug "I'm a big Republican" Ford's Ministerial Zoning Order addiction, gutting environmental protection agencies, trying to sell off the Greenbelt, using covid recovery bills to get his dirt done, etc.

Any rein we've been able to keep on the timbit would dissolve into nada if we allowed the US govt to run their game here. I can't even conceive of much worse they'd make the tar sands in Alberta. 90% of the fisheries would just be trawlers digging up seabeds. Plus the dizzying amount of toxic waste they're already legally dumping here and in Mexico?

Elbows up.

[–] pelicans_plight@lemmy.world 16 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I predict that any company that participates in destroying the parks will end up even worse off then Tesla. I've been a hiker my whole life and I've met a lot of retired military on the trail.

[–] wispy_jsp@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

One would hope, though I have my doubts due to the wood not being a consumer product. People spend little time researching the next president, I would be surprised if enough people track wood sources to the point of being able to accurately boycott

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

They ain't talking about boycotts son.

[–] Eyedust@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

RIP My first thought. Seems appropriate.

Just fyi, I'm pointing out Trump's similarities to an evil villain. I'm not using this to agree. I'm very much against this, having grown up in the woods (practically raised by my local forest, as my mother was an awful drunk and single parent) and I spent most of my youth walking through the peace and quiet of the trees.

I grew up with my mother seeing nothing but my father in me, and was abused for it. Those trees gave me the shelter I needed and I would have been 100x more a mess if I didn't have them. So no. Don't take my fucking trees en masse.

[–] mosscap@slrpnk.net 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

My body is not ready for the amount of alcohol and dancing I am going to force myself to take part in on the day this motherfucker dies and goes to hell.

Literally, the most destructive and evil human on the planet since Hitler. I can't wait until the worms get him. I kind of feel bad for them, but I guess it's part of the job.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 9 points 23 hours ago

Drill, drill, drill! Cut, cut, cut! Slash, slash, slash! Burn, burn, burn! You guys carry on I have to go golfing.

[–] PantanoPete@lemmy.zip 68 points 1 day ago (7 children)

America is a dumpster fire lol, they have all these "checks and balances" but then one guy can just make all the trade policy and land use decisions by decree. What even is the point of their congress

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Checks and balances all died with citizens united….only one left is the second amendment

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

The 2nd amendment is part of the Bill of rights which he already trampled multiple times. There is no right to bear arms anymore, they just haven't had a reason to round anyone who uses them up yet.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 27 points 1 day ago

The problem is that Congress is controlled by people who are Trump sycophants — the Republican Party kicked out everybody who wasn't.

[–] untorquer@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

All governments at some level run on the honor system. When the whole government colludes to not honor the system, you get this.

[–] d0ntpan1c@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 day ago

Problem is that both houses majorities support the lunatic, right now they've more or less given him a blank check to operate.

Historically, the two party system has meant that Congress either votes with the presidents wishes or against when it comes to legislation, but Congress doesn't directly approve/disprove of executive orders. To oppose executive orders, Congress needs to pass laws that override the orders. That wont happen unless the majority becomes convinced they'll lose elections if they keep supporting trump.

It'll be up to the Judicial Branch to directly rule for/against this order. But the judicial branch only truly has power so long as the executive complies. We're close to hitting the test of that power balance on some of his earlier orders.

Fun fact: the law enforcement of the Judicial Branch is technically an agency under the Executive Branch. Not a problem if people are largely operating in good faith with the law, or at least fear repurcussions if they don't comply... But since Trump doesn't fear repurcussion, this fun fact may be the oversight that breaks the consitution.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] yarr@feddit.nl 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Finally, a good move by Trump. Those trees are taking up incredible amounts of water. This is water that could be used for more productive things, like being mixed with Kool-aid powder on a hot day. Moreover, the trees emit large amounts of oxygen, a dangerous corrosive gas. Don't listen to liberals -- tree hugging is a dangerous activity that can lead to abrasions from all the bark.

If there's anything I learned from Dr. Seuss' "The Lorax", logging can lead to impressive industrial and commercial activity and has no downsides.

[–] Grumpyleb@lemmus.org 8 points 21 hours ago

It's insane that I'm 99% sure this is sarcasm, but that 1% has a voice telling me I can't discount Maga being that stupid. This is the age we live in, incredible stupidity.

[–] falkerie71@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago (4 children)

So I just want to chime in here as an outsider. From what I searched, national forests are different from national parks in that, extraction of natural resources from national forests is permitted for commercial and personal use.

Trump's order cites wildfire, insect and disease outbreak as the reason for this change (Biden also sought more logging to combat fire but apparently timber sales did not change much during his tenure). While I agree that forest management is important, Trump had also put tariffs on Canadian lumber and cut down jobs for national park workers. It's not hard to question if there are other motivations other than wildfire prevention in this context.

[–] MountainVeil@slrpnk.net 2 points 9 hours ago

I live in fire country and I can tell you I have zero faith there's going to be any improvement to wildfire prevention. The "inefficient" forestry jobs have all been cut, and now the trails will be overgrown and the weather forecasts will be spottier. Imagine being in a fire crew in that situation, things will be more dangerous now. This is only about extracting resources.

https://apnews.com/article/doge-musk-trump-wildfire-firefighter-pay-firings-fe125ca00f74adbaf996aa23e5d7b408

[–] Statick@programming.dev 4 points 11 hours ago

Here is a good blog post on the nationalforest.org website. Posted in 2013 (according to archive.org).

https://www.nationalforests.org/blog/what-are-the-differences-between-national-parks-and-national-forests

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

real estate development probably, if you think about whats going on in gaza, he wants to do the same there, build properties on untainted lands.

[–] falkerie71@sh.itjust.works 1 points 51 minutes ago

So what you're saying is that he isn't using the trees to build properties, but using the land after the trees has been cut to build property. I can't imagine this would fly legally for national forests though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Those are our national Forests, they don't belong to fascist billionaires like Trump and Musk! Resist, fight back, and let's tell these Nazis they can't strip our environment, government, healthcare and democracy to give tax breaks to rich people...

[–] Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] the_q@lemm.ee 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I got a mod deletion the last time I said anything like this. Good luck and I fucking agree.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The absolute level of stupidity of this is ridiculous. Lumber mills are not designed for old growth trees in the modern era, so all these trees will not even become lumber. Logging has become very sustainable in recent decades. They farm trees and mill them when they reach the size that the machinery at the mills is optimized for. If we just cut down all the forests, the mills can't even process the logs even though it's better lumber. In reality, they'd just send the old growth logs to be ground for pulp which is a total waste. This video does a good job explaining it.

https://youtu.be/efs5-FCVWvg

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] stormdahl@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago

That is just... Insane. Incredibly sad.

load more comments
view more: next ›