this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2025
259 points (95.1% liked)

News

28372 readers
4613 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Anjela Borisova Urumova, 20, received a 23-month prison sentence for falsely accusing Daniel Pierson of attempted rape and kidnapping in Pennsylvania, leading to his wrongful month-long incarceration.

Urumova pled guilty to seven misdemeanors, including filing false reports and fabricating evidence.

Investigators uncovered her lie after finding inconsistencies in surveillance footage. She admitted she targeted Pierson because she had seen him before.

Alongside jail time, she must pay $3,600 in restitution, undergo a mental health evaluation, and serve probation. Prosecutors warned the false claim damaged public trust and harmed real victims.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] khannie@lemmy.world 8 points 6 hours ago

No mention of motivation. I don't understand why anyone would choose a random person to just utterly destroy like that. Like even though he's been found innocent can you imagine the horror of being told you were accused of that?

Anyone read more elsewhere?

[–] secret300@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Nearly two years in prison for falsely accusing someone but if that innocent man got a sentence it would have been 20 plus years...

[–] AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

And if a non-innocent rape the man would get community service.

[–] secret300@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 11 hours ago

Only if he's young and talented

https://lemm.ee/post/60178386

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

Ugh, not nearly enough of a sentence.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 17 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

How the hell do you get from "I saw his truck" to "he tried to kidnap and rape me"

[–] solrize@lemmy.world 45 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

The court press release said she was sentenced to "45 days to 23 months" and the linked news article garbled that to "23 months and 45 days" which they somehow added up to "nearly 2 years". No idea why the sentence itself has such a wide range.

[–] socphoenix@midwest.social 6 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Usually ours to account for things like good behavior/parole I think? I always assumed they used that upper range as the stick part of the incentive to not fuck up again once you’re out of prison since getting sent back would make you serve the longest possible sentence.

[–] Willy@sh.itjust.works 6 points 13 hours ago

could be, or more likely in my mind it's just an ai fuckup.

[–] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 115 points 22 hours ago (4 children)

Not long enough. That's not what he would have gotten.

[–] b3an@lemmy.world 72 points 22 hours ago (35 children)

This kind of stuff boils my blood. Some asshole drags innocent people through some horrible shit for NO REASON.

It would take years to shake that out of you after it was over and done with. Also imagine what family, friends, employers, would say and think or do because of accusations like this.

This is so fucked up.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago

Could not agree more. Not only that, but the kind of damage this does to people with legitimate claims is hard to calculate...

I think she should have gotten what he would have gotten for punishment.

load more comments (34 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] teamevil@lemmy.world 18 points 18 hours ago

Those are some dead/crazy eyes...yikes

[–] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 35 points 21 hours ago

She should get what he would have gotten had he been convicted of her lie.

[–] 2ugly2live@lemmy.world 24 points 21 hours ago

I'm glad she got charged at all, but what a weak sentence.

load more comments
view more: next ›