this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2025
882 points (99.1% liked)

News

28372 readers
4590 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 21 points 2 hours ago

Thoughts and prayers

[–] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 8 points 1 hour ago

I just want to take tbis moment to thank Target for their thoughtful removal of DEI policies. You see I've wanted to move for a really long time and my wife always had a requirement that anywhere we moved to would have a target nearby. It complicated the process. But now, I don't have to adhere to that requirement anymore, because we don't buy anything from them anymore. It's great. So thanks Target for showing my wife you were a lousy bunch of scum sucking greedy pigs. I've known for years, but it's nice to have proof.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 12 points 2 hours ago

Fuck Target anyway. They've always been a shit company. They just hide it.

[–] Osan@lemmy.world 9 points 2 hours ago

Boycotting and striking work we should be organising more of them world wide.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world -3 points 1 hour ago

News blurb on radio today says they are shutting down all US stores

[–] Cocopanda 22 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I mean. I never shopped at a Target. So I’m doing my part.

[–] chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 minutes ago

They're the only store around here that had a certain flavor(cherry chocolate almond) of kind ice cream bar, but I haven't been back in a long time anyway, nor do I intend to.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 12 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Dam well when the feel like making money again they can stop implying they want all their non white and straight customers to be erased.

[–] chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 minutes ago* (last edited 2 minutes ago)

Edit: replied to wrong thread.

[–] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world -3 points 2 hours ago

You mean all their white & straight customers?

[–] RymrgandsDaughter@lemmy.world 9 points 6 hours ago

Target flip flopped in the stupidest way possible. It's like their top guys don't read any reports or that they already removed their diversity and thus anyone that could tell them who exactly shops their before they announced this. lmao 😂 and they can't backtrack it!

[–] llama@lemmy.zip 27 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

15 years ago Target specialized in creating a shopping experience where the consumer could discover trendy, fun, useful items that they couldn't find in other similar retailers. Today it's all the same merchandise you could find anywhere and there's no value proposition to shop at Target.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 8 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Ah yes, Target.

When you think you are too good to go to Wal-Mart, and want to pay 2x-4x the price of price for the same exact stuff.

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 1 points 15 minutes ago

Lots of overlap with Canadian Tire in that respect

[–] warbond@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago

And just like every retailer, they've vertically integrated their supply chain so that they can shove their bullshit brands at you

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 38 points 9 hours ago

Boycotts work. The naysayers are wrong once again.

[–] Captain_Patchy@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Haven't been in a target since they bent the knee, and won't till they fully reinstate Diversity Equity and Inclusion policies.

[–] DNSpapi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Oh my god, you're why these companies get away with this shit. How about not give your business at all? Target showed their true colors and you think by them half-assedly putting in a policy back in when it can just be easily removed is enough for you?

This country is a fucking joke and so are you. Goddamn.

[–] FilthyHookerSpit@lemmy.world 6 points 1 hour ago

I don't think he's wrong. By shopping there once they make the desired changes, you signal to the company what you want to see from them. Other companies notice too. You reward them with your business. But by boycotting then all together, then they have no reason to make progressive policies. I think it's better trying to steer the shitty company than letting them get worse.

[–] GooberEar@lemmy.wtf 4 points 6 hours ago

I've only ever lived once place where there was a Target conveniently close, but it was in a shopping center that was an absolute nightmare to get into and out of. I would still order from them online here and there, mostly clothes. But the last few times I've ordered clothes online from Target, it's been absolute crap quality. My last order actually qualified as false advertising. I ordered a button up shirt. It turned out to be velcro, with only one or two buttons at the very top. And the shirt was so short, it exposed the bottom of my belly button. Prior to that, I ordered a pack of underwear that stunk so bad of chemicals, it made me nauseous.

So, regardless of all the other crap going on with Target, I'd already stopped shopping there.

[–] flamekhan@lemmy.world 30 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

We used to spend a good amount of money at Target and now we won't go anywhere near it. It was great for gift shopping and seasonal stuff but we've figured out better options with retailers that don't have gross values.

[–] MiyamotoKnows@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

So where did you shift your buying to? Hopefully not Walmart or Amazon, who are far worse. Small businesses are not available options in most of America.

[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 12 points 6 hours ago
[–] MellowYellow13@lemmy.world 22 points 12 hours ago

Oh no! Anyways...

[–] Plurrbear@lemmy.world 25 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

As a MN native… fuck Target! I tried until they laid off a bunch of people I know who didn’t wanna work in the DEAD downtown MPLS scene when given the new “rule” … savage!

[–] dditty@lemm.ee 14 points 11 hours ago

Same here. It sucks since Target was/is better than Wal Mart and the Daytons legacy still had them doing a lot of philanthropic donations. But yeah I haven't shopped at Target in probably 4-5 months now.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 79 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
[–] pyre@lemmy.world 48 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)
[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 29 points 11 hours ago

Remove DEI, DIE.

[–] Veneroso@lemmy.world 0 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] forrcaho@lemmy.world 2 points 43 minutes ago

That article says they're closing for Easter, which is not an uncommon thing in the US-- for example, Costco will also do that. Nothing to do with the boycott, or "looting".

[–] Take_your_zync@eviltoast.org 39 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I specifically bought tomboyx boxer briefs for women at target to support their lgbt inclusivity before they dropped dei. Now I won't buy anything from them at all. I know target wasn't perfect but I wanted there to be more options available for people that need them and target was offering that with dei. Now, fuck em. They don't support the people that make their business possible.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 12 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

To be fair to target most business is just talk when it comes to these types of things.

Consumers need to understand that corporate support for any particular initiative begins and ends with how it affects the bottom line.

Disney, Google, even Costco cannot actually care about any of these things. The corporate incentives do not allow for it.

[–] ibelieveinthehousehippo@lemmy.ca 14 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I know it's not genuine. I still demand the performance though.

[–] grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

The performance serves as a barometer for how, idk, accepted a thing is. Having LGBTQ displays made me, an LGBTQ person, feel like Corporations thought we were a market worth wooing. Taking that and DEI away is a kick in the teeth. It feels worse than never having the displays or DEI programs in the first place.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 25 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

thier prices have always been more expensive and close to walgreens prices, they pride themselves as the bougie walmart version. they have also gotten rid of thier own in-brand items, in favor of cheapflationed items.

[–] unsettlinglymoist@lemmy.world 9 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (3 children)

I've never understood the appeal of Target. There's a huge Target 60 seconds down the street from me and I never shop there except to get one or two items. It's expensive, has a ridiculously small grocery section while clothing takes up half the store, and they're so worried about shoplifters that they have multiple security staff standing at the door giving everyone leaving the stink eye.

[–] ImADifferentBird@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I used to shop at Target for clothes, as it's a good place for cheap clothes that isn't Wal-Mart (which I avoid both because I don't like their practices and also just because it's a deeply unpleasant place). Haven't been there since these boycotts began, though, and I don't plan in going back if I can avoid it.

My local one isn't super locked down like yours, though. At least it wasn't last time I was in there. I'd probably have stopped shopping there much sooner if it was.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

Yeah, I like their good fellow brand. It walks the line of cheap but fashionable well enough for me.

Outside of that, I appreciate having a brick and mortar store to shop for somethings. Buying things like clothes online is just painful to me.

[–] trashboat@midwest.social 5 points 11 hours ago

I know people who like Target partly because of their selection of skincare products, and a lot of their clothes are stylish and relatively durable for what you pay for them. Both of those qualities can be found in plenty of other stores, though. Never bothered shopping for groceries there because the prices are truly ridiculous for a supermarket

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 hours ago

It'd a status thing. If you feel shame or whatever buying cheap kids clothes from walmart, cause other parents will judge you or something, then you would feel better shopping at target. Its a way of saying "we aren't poor". I think people that dont associate their identity with items like that dont see the appeal of target.

I'm like you, its too expensive and they have a poor selection of groceries.

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 42 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

I called to specifically inform them that I was a decently regular shopper, as someone who avoids many "mega-corps", and that in the wake of their anti-DEI move, I would never buy anything from them ever again.

Granted, I live in a city with many shops of various local varieties, and have other options. I'm aware the same chances aren't available to everyone else.

[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 4 points 6 hours ago

I send emails to their support team every time I buy something at Costco to remind them. I'm probably blocked by their systems.

But it's about the message.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 12 hours ago

Did you call their corporate offices? Because if you just called your local branch, I can assure you that the person you spoke to could not give less of a shit lol

load more comments
view more: next ›